Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Teachers union backs Angelides for governor Treasurer says he'd raise taxes to fund education
SFC ^ | Feb. 3, 2006 | John Wildermuth

Posted on 02/03/2006 11:37:45 AM PST by FairOpinion

Standing beside the head of the powerful California Teachers Association, Democratic state Treasurer Phil Angelides vowed Thursday to pump more money into education if he is elected governor, even if he has to raise taxes to do it.

While California ranks near the national average in per-pupil spending, that isn't good enough, said Angelides, who was in San Francisco to receive the endorsement of the 335,000-member teachers union.

The billions of dollars needed to pay for that boost in school spending will come from closing tax loopholes for big corporations, cracking down on tax scofflaws and boosting taxes on the richest Californians.

The state's wealthiest taxpayers already have received billions in tax breaks from the Bush administration, Angelides said.

"We can ask them to give some of that back," he said.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: angelides; schwarzenegger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
Echos of Hillary.

I hope the little Dem supporting group here will be very happy with Angelides as governor, since they are making an all out effort to defeat Arnold, and ensure that McClintock won't get elected Lt. Governor, while still insisting they are conservatives.

1 posted on 02/03/2006 11:37:46 AM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

"echoes" -- typo.

Anyone has that exact quote from Hillary about taxes and taking it back from the people?


2 posted on 02/03/2006 11:39:51 AM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
The billions of dollars needed to pay for that boost in school spending will come from closing tax loopholes for big corporations, cracking down on tax scofflaws and boosting taxes on the richest Californians.

Sounds like the formula to lower the tax base in California dramatically. Driving out jobs is always a good idea.

3 posted on 02/03/2006 11:40:36 AM PST by bfree (PC is BS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

I found it,



"Many of you are well enough off that ... the tax cuts may have helped you," Sen. Clinton said. "We're saying that for America to get back on track, we're probably going to cut that short and not give it to you. We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."

-- Hillary Clinton, June 28, 2004



http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/news/archive/2004/06/28/politics2039EDT0165.DTL&type=printable


===

Angelides seems to try to emulate Hillary, yet some people in this very forum, still prefer him to Arnold, who did not raise taxes, despite the pressure the Dems put on him.


4 posted on 02/03/2006 11:42:53 AM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

"Echos of Hillary."

Echos of Bush too. He raised federal education spending over 70% so far. Not to mention reciting the liberal mantra just he other day about "we need to train more teachers".

The "shortage of teachers" has got to be one of the longest standing BS stories around.


5 posted on 02/03/2006 11:43:06 AM PST by Pessimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Well, we can scratch that one off the list.


6 posted on 02/03/2006 11:43:15 AM PST by CindyDawg (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion; windcliff
"We can ask them to give some of that back," he said.

. . . and wonder why they keep leaving the state. Will the campaign slogan be, "It's for the children?"

7 posted on 02/03/2006 11:43:54 AM PST by I Drive Too Fast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Oh, I'm sorry. Maybe not. This is Calif. I thought I read Texas.


8 posted on 02/03/2006 11:44:25 AM PST by CindyDawg (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
A teachers' union which supports a candidate who promises to "fund education"?

Nope...sorry.I don't believe it for a minute.

9 posted on 02/03/2006 11:46:31 AM PST by Gay State Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Since you are such fan of Angelides, and don't think there is any difference between him and Arnold, thought you'd like to see this.


10 posted on 02/03/2006 11:49:11 AM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

In a pithy mood, are we? lol


11 posted on 02/03/2006 11:53:08 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Democrat/socialists are forcing out the productive people, leaving behind the dregs.


12 posted on 02/03/2006 11:55:42 AM PST by scratcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

"While California ranks near the national average in per-pupil spending, that isn't good enough..."

For the RAT/lib/socialist/NEA members -- NO AMOUNT of money will ever be enough -- for any entitlement!


13 posted on 02/03/2006 11:57:27 AM PST by Polyxene (For where God built a church, there the Devil would also build a chapel - Martin Luther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Polyxene
One of our state legislators stated that even if we gave our entire budget to the education department they would still whine that it wasn't enough--here's the twist the guy was a dem, and I live in a blue state.
14 posted on 02/03/2006 12:10:28 PM PST by adgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Yep. More money for education means higher saleries for educators, means more costs, means more needs for money for education, means higher......


15 posted on 02/03/2006 12:15:13 PM PST by Inspector Kemp (You can lead a liberal to reality, but you can't make them think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Inspector Kemp

Sorry to any CA Freepers but I think Arnold should just drop out and let the socialists have the place. It's not worth the fight any longer when a moderate to left-leaning Gov like Arnold is considered an ultra-rightwinger and fought at every turn. Just hand em the keys and turn out the lights behind you it's over. On second thought don't bother to turn out the lights the electricity will run out soon enough anyway and they can just light a 36 million candles. Woops that may cause air pollution so I guess they'll just have to sit in the dark. Hell they're all blind anyway.


16 posted on 02/03/2006 12:27:25 PM PST by marlon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Inspector Kemp
Yep. More money for education means higher saleries for educators, means more costs, means more needs for money..

I think you forgot a couple of "links" in the "chain" that you just described:

"means higher salaries for *more* teachers" and

"means higher salaries for *more* union leaders".

Sound good to you?

17 posted on 02/03/2006 12:32:25 PM PST by Gay State Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
Darn, you're right.

But, you forgot the mandatory donations from teachers to democrat candidates.
18 posted on 02/03/2006 12:39:00 PM PST by Inspector Kemp (You can lead a liberal to reality, but you can't make them think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: marlon

Think of that!

Arnold saying that he's going to turn the government over to the democrats so they can run things the way they'd like. I just can't see him saying it in spanish.


19 posted on 02/03/2006 12:40:25 PM PST by Inspector Kemp (You can lead a liberal to reality, but you can't make them think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
More money = more learning, a myth per Stossel. Myth: Schools Need More Money (John Stossel)
20 posted on 02/03/2006 12:41:10 PM PST by Flifuss (SCE to Aux.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson