[cake_crumb]

"Doing nothing is better than Bush's schemes to tear the border even wider open with his permanent amnesty and global labor market for all American jobs"

I see. So YOUR solution is to "do nothing", so you've rendered your own posts to meaningless venom.

[inquest]

"Doing nothing is better than Bush's schemes to tear the border even wider open with his permanent amnesty and global labor market for all American jobs"

I see. So YOUR solution is to "do nothing"

That's obviously not what he said. Minimal reading comprehension is all that's required here.

Yes or no: Is making no change to the current policy better than making a bad change?

[dagnabbit]

Doing nothing = large number of unassimilated third-world migrants in the USA = bad.

Bush Jr. amnesty betrayal schemes = much larger number of such migrants in the USA, de facto merger with Mexico = very much worse.

When the choice is between nothing and greater harm, nothing is a valid option, and unfortunately until weasel immigration leftists like Ted Kennedy and George Bush are no longer calling the shots, that's as good a choice as we're going to get.

This isn't complicated.

[chris1]

GWB has completely sold this country down te third world rat hole by giving in to FOX and signing on to the CFR North Atlantic plan. Read about it.