Posted on 02/01/2006 11:15:50 AM PST by rip033
WASHINGTON, Jan. 31 (UPI) -- The American media stood up and took notice when an improvised explosive device grievously injured an ABC News crew Sunday.
In Iraq, and throughout the military, there is sympathy and concern for anchor Bob Woodruff and cameraman Doug Vogt, but there is also this question:
"Why do you think this is such a huge story?" wrote an officer stationed in Baqubah, Iraq, Monday via e-mail. "It's a bit stunning to us over here how absolutely dominant the story is on every network and front page. I mean, you'd think we lost the entire 1st Marine Division or something. "There's a lot of grumbling from guys at all ranks about it. That's a really impolite and impolitic thing to say ... but it's what you would hear over here."
At least 2,242 troops have died in Iraq since the war's start, 1,753 of them killed in action. Another 16,000 have been injured, half of them seriously enough to require evacuation from the battlefield. According to the Pentagon, 60 percent of the deaths are the result of IEDs. IEDs have injured more than 9,200 troops, nine times more than gunshots.
"The point that is currently being made (is that) that press folks are more important than mere military folks," a senior military officer told UPI Tuesday
Ohhh, no sir, that just isn't possible; everyone knows just how caring & others-minded all of the respected news reporters, journalists and TV Netwrecks are. [uber-heavy, weapons-grade sarcasm]
Oh, give it up. Journalists aren't more important. They're just more famous.
When something dramatic happens to someone well-known, whether in a war zone or a city street (which can be one and the same), it's news. Especially if not much else is going on.
Which also explains how Sheehan got coverage in August, during the summer recess, and was promptly erased from the tube when Katrina hit. Or how Chandra Levy -- remember her? -- was everywhere till 911, then basically forgotten.
Sunday was a slow news day, and a network anchorman is well-known. That's it.
Let's get on with things that matter.
I thought this article was interesting. It almost seems UPI is trying to bad mouth the troops making them look like complainers and at the same time justify why journalists who are hurt in Iraq are better print. I thought the same thing the trooper who was quoted when I first heard the Woodruff story. If it's not nice round KIA number or a good video shot of a IED attack by insurgents then they could care less. Rebuilding schools and helping local people just doesn't seem like a good story to many in the MSM. I guess the old saying still goes, "if it bleeds it leads."
I'm sorry he and his camera man got hurt, but they are just two more statistics to me. Many thousands of our troops have been hurt and they are the real men and women of this war. Not som limp wristed mike holder............
I didn't (and still don't) know him...or any other run-of-the-news-mill reporter.
The other ugly little secret is that this terrible accident came at the perfect...February ratings sweeps have just started.
sorry...should be "the perfect TIME...Feb sweeps just started"
This is all about the news media making a hero out of one of their own. I'm betting it won't be long before they blame the military for not protecting them well enough, or the government for giving them 'inadequate' body armor, or Bush for starting the war in the first place, or.......... you fill in the blanks.
If anybody thinks the Viet Nam vets have a bad attitude about the MSM, just stand by for the WOT vets' reaction when they get home.
CNN's going to be offering to pay kickbacks to subscribers.
Full article:
So do the troops' parents.
I have a daughter and son-in-law with boots on the ground in Iraq and the universe wouldn't even hear their name whispered, let alone shouted from every broadcast and print media outlet in existence for weeks on end, if she was injured or killed in a blast like this.
Who says we don't have a nobility in this country? Sure we do. The Media and the Pols of both parties consider themselves FAR better than we unwashed masses are.
Why do you think the Pols built themselves such elaborate bomb shelters during the cold war and left us subway tunnels and high-school basements? And built beneath one of the ritziest hotels in the East yet.
Sure they think they're better than we are. No Question!
Subject: Conservative/Liberal Movements
To all my friends who like the truth,
I have been reading books about human genetics, such as The Seven Daughters of Eve, and here is what I have learned.....
Humans existed as members of small bands of nomadic hunter/gatherers. They lived on deer in the mountains during the summer & would go to the coast and live on fish and lobster in winter.
The 2 most important events in all of history were the invention of beer and the invention of the wheel. The wheel was invented to get man to the beer. These were the foundations of modern civilization and together were the catalyst for the splitting of humanity into 2 distinct subgroups: Liberals and Conservatives.
Once beer was discovered it required grain and that was the beginning of agriculture. Neither the glass bottle nor aluminum can were invented yet, so while our early human ancestors were sitting around waiting for them to be invented, they just stayed close to the brewery. That's how villages were formed.
Some men spent their days tracking and killing animals to B-B-Q at night while they were drinking beer. This was the beginning of what is known as "the Conservative movement."
Other men who were weaker and less skilled at hunting learned to live off the conservatives by showing up for the nightly B-B-Q's and doing the sewing, fetching and hair dressing. This was the beginning of the Liberal movement. Some of these liberal men eventually evolved into women. The rest became known as 'girliemen.'
Some noteworthy liberal achievements include the domestication of cats, the invention of group therapy and group hugs, and the concept of Democratic voting to decide how to divide the meat and beer that conservatives provided.
Over the years conservatives came to be symbolized by the largest, most powerful land animal on earth, the elephant. Liberals are symbolized by the jackass.
Modern liberals like imported beer (with lime added), but most prefer white wine or imported bottled water. They eat raw fish but like their beef well done. Sushi, tofu, and French food are standard liberal fare.
Another interesting revolutionary side note: most of their women have higher testosterone levels than their men. Most social workers, personal injury attorneys, journalists, dreamers in Hollywood and group therapists are liberals. Liberals invented the designated hitter rule
because it wasn't "fair" to make the pitcher also bat.
Conservatives drink domestic beer. They eat red meat and still provide for their women. Conservatives are big-game hunters, rodeo cowboys, lumberjacks, construction workers, firemen, medical doctors, police officers, corporate executives, Marines, athletes and generally anyone who works productively.
Conservatives who own companies hire other conservatives who want to work for a living.
Liberals produce little or nothing. They like to "govern" the producers and decide what to do with the production. Liberals believe Europeans are more enlightened than Americans. That is why most of the liberals remained in Europe when conservatives were coming to America.
They crept in after the Wild West was tamed and created a business of trying to get MORE for nothing.
Here ends today's lesson in world history:
It should be noted that a Liberal may have a momentary urge to respond to the above before simply laughing and forwarding it. A Conservative will be so convinced of the absolute truth of this history that it will be forwarded immediately to other "true believers."
I think part of the reason for the coverage is the immediacy of it. When a soldier is killed in Iraq, you don't know about it right away. In fact, there seems to be several days between when the event occurs and when the military releases the name of the dead soldiers. By the time the name is released, it is no longer "news." This event was happening in real time.
I agree. The MSM has Hell to pay.
But regarding Woodruff, we need to be careful about asking the MSM to cover death and injury more.
Already the left is saying "but we want to film coffins but they won't let us!"
We know what these jackasses really want to do...so lets not get mad at them for not covering deaths and injuries of soldiers.
The public would have given up already if it were published how each soldier was killed or got injured (especially paralyzations).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.