To: Sweetjustusnow
2 posted on
01/30/2006 10:30:54 PM PST by
balch3
To: balch3
Geological evidence does not provide us with the spectrum of intermediate species we would expect. Moreover, laboratory experiments reveal how close to impossible it is for one species to evolve into another, even allowing for selective breeding and some genetic mutation. Very well said, Irving Kristol!
To: balch3; gobucks; mikeus_maximus; MeanWestTexan; JudyB1938; isaiah55version11_0; bondserv; ...
(((Creationist Ping)))

You have been pinged because of your interest regarding matters of Creation vs. Evolution - from the Creationist perspective. Freep-mail me if you want on/off this list.
Colossians 1:16 "For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him."
It IS puzzling how vicious and dogmatic people like Krauthammer and Will get on the subject.
Dr. Berlinskis stance on evolution isnt new; he is already on record in
Commentary as saying:
The facts in favor of evolution are often held to be incontrovertible; prominent biologists shake their heads at the obduracy of those who would dispute them. Those facts however, have been rather less forthcoming than evolutionary biologists might have hoped.
Biologists often affirm that as members of the scientific community they positively welcome criticism. Nonsense. Like everyone else, biologists loathe criticism and arrange their lives so as to avoid it. Criticism has nonetheless seeped into their souls, the process of doubt a curiously Darwinian one in which individual biologists entertain minor reservations about their theory without ever recognizing the degree to which these doubts mount up to a substantial deficit. Creationism, so often the target of their indignation is the least of their worries.
Unable to say WHAT evolution has accomplished, biologists now find themselves unable to say WHETHER evolution has accomplished it. This leaves evolutionary theory in the doubly d*amend position of having compromised the concepts needed to make sense of life complexity, adaptation, design while simultaneously conceding tha the theory does little to explain them.
Berlinski, David, The Deniable Darwin, Commentary, vol. 101 (June 1996), pp. 19-29)
By the way, our new word for the week is lacunae!
1 entry found for lacunae.
la·cu·na ( P ) Pronunciation Key (l -ky n ) n. pl. la·cu·nae (-n ) or la·cu·nas
- An empty space or a missing part; a gap: self-centered in opinion, with curious lacunae of astounding ignorance (Frank Norris).
- Anatomy. A cavity, space, or depression, especially in a bone, containing cartilage or bone cells.
|
257 posted on
01/31/2006 11:32:54 AM PST by
DaveLoneRanger
("We are a religious people whose institutions presuppose a Supreme Being." SCOTUS, Zorach v. Clauson)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson