Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: connectthedots

George Will is usually right, but he is wrong on this one.

Ditto for Charles Krauthammer. I have the utmost respect for Krauthammer's political acumen, but he fumbled the ball on this one.

Both of them have fallen for the transparent lie that the only alternative to purely naturalistic evolution is biblical creationism.

If you get a chance, please check out a couple of articles I wrote at

http://RussP.us/IDscience.htm
http://RussP.us/Dawkins.htm


17 posted on 01/30/2006 11:10:15 PM PST by RussP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: RussP; connectthedots
Both of them have fallen for the transparent lie that the only alternative to purely naturalistic evolution is biblical creationism.

You're arguing apples and oranges. While it's true that biblical creationism is not the "only alternative to purely naturalistic evolution", the fact remains that the push to get ID into the schools is being done almost exclusively by biblical creationists for the purpose of making the schools more "God friendly".

George Will and Krauthammer are concerned about the latter, and the former is irrelevant to that concern.

If you doubt the fundamental (no pun intended) motivations of most members of the "ID movement" are as I describe, sit down and spend a few days reading the testimony in the Kitzmiller trial, for starters.

21 posted on 01/30/2006 11:15:35 PM PST by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson