[Right Wing Professor]

Here is where I believe that the TOE fails. It makes at least one major assumption that cannot be proven by science. It assumes that there is no God.

Utter nonsense. TOE makes no such assumption, and I defy you to find any scientific textbook that says it does.

[ShadowAce]

TOE makes no such assumption, ...

OK, then lay out the TOE, and point out the possibility that God may have created everything we see. There is no mention of God, because the TOE assumes His non-existance.

[frgoff]

Carl Sagan said it best in Cosmos:

Evolution doesn't require a God, so why create an unnecessary step and include Him?