Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EU Hosts Last-Ditch Talks On Iran
BBC ^ | 1-30-2006

Posted on 01/29/2006 7:43:47 PM PST by blam

EU hosts last-ditch talks on Iran

Western powers suspect Iran's nuclear ambitions are not peaceful

The EU is set to hold last-minute talks with Iran - at Tehran's request - to try to resolve a stand-off over Iran's controversial nuclear programme. Iran requested the meeting with envoys from Britain, France and Germany.

Foreign ministers from the EU-3 will also discuss the issue at separate talks in London with their counterparts from the US, Russia and China.

On Thursday, the UN nuclear watchdog is due to hold urgent talks and could refer Iran to the UN Security Council.

The EU and the US want Iran to be referred to the council for possible sanctions after Tehran restarted its nuclear programme.

They suspect that Iran is aiming to produce nuclear weapons. Tehran says its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes only.

Washington, many European powers and also Israel distrust Iran, partly because it had kept its nuclear research secret for 18 years before it was revealed in 2002.

Intense diplomacy

A British spokesman said the three European nations would listen to what Tehran had to say in Brussels, the BBC's Clare Doyle says.

Mr Straw is insistent that diplomacy is the way to resolve the crisis

But the spokesman said Europe's position remained unchanged - it was time for the UN Security Council to become involved.

Later on Monday, foreign ministers from Britain, France, Germany, Russia, China and the US are expected to try to co-ordinate their position on the issue at the talks in London.

Moscow and Beijing have argued for Iran to be given more time, but neither has completely ruled out having the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) refer Iran to the UN Security Council - which can impose sanctions.

Iranian officials had previously said they had nothing to fear from such a move and that sanctions would hurt the West more than Iran, our correspondent says.

'Softer' line

But she says there now seem to be signs that Tehran could be preparing to compromise.

Officials there have taken a much softer line recently on Russia's proposal to enrich uranium on its territory for use in Iran's nuclear programme, our correspondent says.

On Saturday, British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw said talks aimed at resolving the dispute must allow Iran to maintain its national dignity.

"We must have a bargain which enables both sides to come out of it with their head held high," Mr Straw said at the World Economic Forum in Davos.

Mr Straw has repeatedly said that the crisis must be resolved through diplomatic, not military, means.

However, Republican US Senator John McCain, also attending the World Economic Forum, said that the threat of military action should be retained in case all else fails.

"We have to keep the military option as the last option but not take it off the table," Mr McCain said. "Otherwise I am not sure how we have any significant leverage."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ditch; eu; hosts; iran; irannukes; last; talks
Another round of last-ditch talks.
1 posted on 01/29/2006 7:43:49 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam
talks aimed at resolving the dispute must allow Iran to maintain its national dignity.

Why the hell are -WE- in control of -THEIR- dignity?

Seems to me like it should be -THEIR- responsibility.

2 posted on 01/29/2006 7:47:11 PM PST by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Iran Sets Up Secret Team To Infiltrate UN Nuclear Watchdog, Say Officials
3 posted on 01/29/2006 7:48:41 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

NO NUKES FOR NUTCASES


4 posted on 01/29/2006 7:49:45 PM PST by FreeKeys (DemocRATS play politics with national security.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Is this like before they put Iran on double secret probation?


5 posted on 01/29/2006 7:49:57 PM PST by Cornpone (Who Dares Wins -- Defame Islam Today -- Tell the Truth About Muhammad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

The EU three has announced that more last ditch talks will be scheduled for next month, and throughout the spring as needed. (Sarcasm)


6 posted on 01/29/2006 7:54:10 PM PST by STU_1963 (Life is better without liberals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
cant have these threads without this
7 posted on 01/29/2006 7:58:02 PM PST by Flavius (Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

"When you have to shoot, shoot, don't talk"

8 posted on 01/29/2006 7:58:43 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham (A Liberal: One who demands half of your pie because he didn't bake one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: Izzy Dunne

Iranian national dignity requires a leader with at least some pretense of sanity. Persians presently lack both. So how about this compromise: Iran loses its nuclear weapons programs, nuclear research facilities, enriched uranium, and whatever other atomic physics/energy/military projects they have. In return, they cease and desist supporting terrorists, drop their Chief Ayatollah, get new free, fair, and open elections for President and legislature, and ditch the Guardian Council and communistic economic system, receive the Bill of Rights, and become an American protectorate. That compromise would restore Iranian national dignity and set the country on the road to peace.


10 posted on 01/29/2006 8:06:28 PM PST by dufekin (US Senate: the only place where the majority [44 D] comprises fewer than the minority [55 R])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bennotayahoo
It seems that the world has made it a priority to prevent nuclear proliferation, but when confronted with the need to act to prevent a rogue country from aquiring these weapons nobody wants to step up.

Israel may have to act on its own, but it is a shame that the they have to be placed in a position of acting alone.
11 posted on 01/29/2006 8:07:51 PM PST by STU_1963 (Life is better without liberals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: blam

What is this crap. Discussions? WW1, WW2, Korea, Viet Nam, Gulf War 1, Gulf War 2. When have 'talks' resolved anything. Let's use the technology we have. Way past time we act, and not react.


12 posted on 01/29/2006 8:09:33 PM PST by Westlander (Unleash the Neutron Bomb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam


Last Ditch talks: Part 1 of ?


13 posted on 01/29/2006 9:52:22 PM PST by Tzimisce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson