Posted on 01/29/2006 9:06:34 AM PST by A.A. Cunningham
Ditched jet to stay on seabed
The pilot was forced to eject from the US Navy jet off the Australian coast late on Saturday after a night landing "mishap".
The single-seat F/A-18C twin-engine strike fighter was the first plane lost from the 97,000-tonne carrier, which spent last week moored at Brisbane's Fisherman Islands.
It was not clear last night if the jet had been carrying weapons.
It was the second incident involving a US Navy F/A-18 jet in the past 10 days. A pilot was killed when a jet crashed in California during a training mission on January 18.
The US Navy is investigating both incidents.
The pilot of the plane ditched on Saturday night, whose name was not released, spent 15 minutes in the ocean before being rescued but was not injured.
Ship spokesman Lt-Cdr Gary Ross said the plane was lost at 10.17pm on Saturday during a failed "arrested landing" on the deck of the giant aircraft carrier.
"It was attempting to land on the flight deck during night flights," he said. "The pilot ejected and was rescued using one of our helicopters."
The Ronald Reagan was not damaged and remained "mission capable".
"We're continuing operations in the west Pacific," he said. "We train for this we train for regular operations as well as for emergencies, so our pilots are ready to act."
The ship, on its maiden overseas deployment, left Brisbane on Friday morning and had been due to conduct naval operations in support of the war on terror as well as security commitments in the western Pacific.
Lt-Cdr Ross said it was not yet known whether the F/A-18 worth $40 million would be recovered.
However, another US military official said it was unlikely even though the military usually tried to recover aircraft to safeguard top-secret electronic equipment.
Lt-Cdr Ross refused to reveal the exact location of the ship when the incident happened for security reasons but it was believed to be in deep water past the edge of the continental shelf.
Lt-Cdr Ross said the plane had been correctly maintained as required under military regulations.
"The aircraft is maintained constantly during operations," he said. "We constantly monitor how long the aircraft operates and flies and according to our maintenance regulations, that is when we perform maintenance on the aircraft."
Another five F/A-18s, which were also involved in the night exercises, flew to Brisbane after the incident.
"We just did the safest option, to send them to Brisbane International Airport." Lt-Cdr Ross said.
Brisbane Airport spokesman Jim Carden said the five other planes had landed at the Brisbane international airport about 12.30am yesterday.
The five pilots stayed overnight in Brisbane and returned to the carrier about noon.
|
|
A jet at the bottom of the ocean is hardly what one should be calling a "mishap".
15 minutes? Did the aviator even get wet?
IT was attempting to land? Did IT decide to land in the drink in direct disobedience to the pilot? (Sorry, I just think that's funny wording. Glad the pilot is okay.)
Well, this should keep the Chinese busy for a while.
No kidding. I was thinking them or the Koreans.
Just damn.
If you want on the list, FReepmail me. This IS a high-volume PING list...
Mishap is the correct term to use in an aircraft accident no matter what the severity of the crash or damage. Althought it generally refers to an accident in which the damage exceeds $25,000, there are personal injuries which require hospitilization over 48 hours or there are broken bones other than nose, toes or fingers.
F-18's been around for a while. They probably already know all they need to know about it. Since the US decided to not recover it, it probably has nothing of importance on it.
Just curious... Anyone know where I can find uptodate and reasonably accurate sea charts online? Started looking after reading this article, but could only find old collectible historical maps which are for sale and completely unreadable on this monitor. Just want to see exactly how deep the ocean is off Brisbane, where the continental shelf is, etc. Thx.
"mishap" is standard navy lingo for an accident.
With a son who aspires to fly fighter jets, I'm REALLY glad to read that the pilot is OK.
No matter how cool you look landing on a carrier, you're still stuck on a boat in the middle of nowhere with 5,000 other men when you're done.
By U.S. Seventh Fleet Public Affairs
BRISBANE, Australia (NNS) -- A single seat F/A-18C Hornet assigned to Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 25 and to Carrier Air Wing 14 was involved in a mishap while attempting to land on the flight deck of the aircraft carrier USS Ronald Reagan (CVN 76) approximately 120 miles southeast of Brisbane, Australia, Jan. 28 at approximately 4:17 a.m. (PST).
The pilot ejected safely and was recovered. There were no injuries.
The name of the pilot will not be released until next-of-kin have been notified. USS Ronald Reagan and the embarked airwing remain fully mission capable and ready to respond as required.
VFA-25 operates from Lemoore, Calif. The F/A-18C is a single seat, twin engine, mid-wing, multi-mission tactical aircraft.
The incident is currently under investigation.
>>> 5,000 other men when you're done <<<<
The RR is a PC Co-ed ship.
"Since the US decided to not recover it, it probably has nothing of importance on it."
More likely the plane's in water too deep to go after.
Hi! Missed you!
Sure, but it's a generality. And.. it's funny.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.