Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ditched jet to stay on seabed
The Courier Mail ^ | 30 January 2006 | Cameron Atfield and Rosanne Barrett

Posted on 01/29/2006 9:06:34 AM PST by A.A. Cunningham


Ditched jet to stay on seabed
Cameron Atfield and Rosanne Barrett
30jan06

A $40 million fighter jet which ditched into the sea 220km southeast of Brisbane after failing to land on aircraft carrier USS Ronald Reagan is unlikely to be salvaged.

The pilot was forced to eject from the US Navy jet off the Australian coast late on Saturday after a night landing "mishap".

The single-seat F/A-18C twin-engine strike fighter was the first plane lost from the 97,000-tonne carrier, which spent last week moored at Brisbane's Fisherman Islands.

It was not clear last night if the jet had been carrying weapons.

It was the second incident involving a US Navy F/A-18 jet in the past 10 days. A pilot was killed when a jet crashed in California during a training mission on January 18.

The US Navy is investigating both incidents.

The pilot of the plane ditched on Saturday night, whose name was not released, spent 15 minutes in the ocean before being rescued but was not injured.

Ship spokesman Lt-Cdr Gary Ross said the plane was lost at 10.17pm on Saturday during a failed "arrested landing" on the deck of the giant aircraft carrier.

"It was attempting to land on the flight deck during night flights," he said. "The pilot ejected and was rescued using one of our helicopters."

The Ronald Reagan was not damaged and remained "mission capable".

"We're continuing operations in the west Pacific," he said. "We train for this – we train for regular operations as well as for emergencies, so our pilots are ready to act."

The ship, on its maiden overseas deployment, left Brisbane on Friday morning and had been due to conduct naval operations in support of the war on terror as well as security commitments in the western Pacific.

Lt-Cdr Ross said it was not yet known whether the F/A-18 – worth $40 million – would be recovered.

However, another US military official said it was unlikely even though the military usually tried to recover aircraft to safeguard top-secret electronic equipment.

Lt-Cdr Ross refused to reveal the exact location of the ship when the incident happened for security reasons but it was believed to be in deep water past the edge of the continental shelf.

Lt-Cdr Ross said the plane had been correctly maintained as required under military regulations.

"The aircraft is maintained constantly during operations," he said. "We constantly monitor how long the aircraft operates and flies – and according to our maintenance regulations, that is when we perform maintenance on the aircraft."

Another five F/A-18s, which were also involved in the night exercises, flew to Brisbane after the incident.

"We just did the safest option, to send them to Brisbane International Airport." Lt-Cdr Ross said.

Brisbane Airport spokesman Jim Carden said the five other planes had landed at the Brisbane international airport about 12.30am yesterday.

The five pilots stayed overnight in Brisbane and returned to the carrier about noon.


            © Queensland Newspapers



TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: fa18; planecrash; usn; ussronaldreagan
Either VFA-25 or VFA-113
1 posted on 01/29/2006 9:06:35 AM PST by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham

A jet at the bottom of the ocean is hardly what one should be calling a "mishap".


2 posted on 01/29/2006 9:08:22 AM PST by mtbopfuyn (Legality does not dictate morality... Lavin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham
The pilot of the plane ditched on Saturday night, whose name was not released, spent 15 minutes in the ocean before being rescued but was not injured.

15 minutes? Did the aviator even get wet?

3 posted on 01/29/2006 9:10:27 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham
"It was attempting to land on the flight deck during night flights," he said. "The pilot ejected and was rescued using one of our helicopters."

IT was attempting to land? Did IT decide to land in the drink in direct disobedience to the pilot? (Sorry, I just think that's funny wording. Glad the pilot is okay.)

4 posted on 01/29/2006 9:11:45 AM PST by arasina (So there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham
Something cool for archeologists to find thousands of years from now.
5 posted on 01/29/2006 9:12:29 AM PST by A knight without armor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham

Well, this should keep the Chinese busy for a while.


6 posted on 01/29/2006 9:12:30 AM PST by Zuben Elgenubi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arasina
Sorta like, "Out of control SUV mows down pedestrians" LOL!
7 posted on 01/29/2006 9:15:21 AM PST by upchuck (Article posts of just one or two sentences do not preserve the quality of FR. Lazy FReepers be gone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Zuben Elgenubi

No kidding. I was thinking them or the Koreans.


8 posted on 01/29/2006 9:17:07 AM PST by satchmodog9 (Most people stand on the tracks and never even hear the train coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; Ed_NYC; MonroeDNA; widgysoft; Springman; Timesink; dubyaismypresident; Grani; coug97; ...
"Oops!"

Just damn.

If you want on the list, FReepmail me. This IS a high-volume PING list...

9 posted on 01/29/2006 9:23:38 AM PST by mhking (Tell me what you don't like about yourself...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mtbopfuyn

Mishap is the correct term to use in an aircraft accident no matter what the severity of the crash or damage. Althought it generally refers to an accident in which the damage exceeds $25,000, there are personal injuries which require hospitilization over 48 hours or there are broken bones other than nose, toes or fingers.


10 posted on 01/29/2006 9:24:09 AM PST by Just_de_facts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Zuben Elgenubi

F-18's been around for a while. They probably already know all they need to know about it. Since the US decided to not recover it, it probably has nothing of importance on it.


11 posted on 01/29/2006 9:27:01 AM PST by Clock King ("How will it end?" - Emperor; "In Fire." - Kosh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham
Lt-Cdr Ross refused to reveal the exact location of the ship when the incident happened for security reasons but it was believed to be in deep water past the edge of the continental shelf.

Just curious... Anyone know where I can find uptodate and reasonably accurate sea charts online? Started looking after reading this article, but could only find old collectible historical maps which are for sale and completely unreadable on this monitor. Just want to see exactly how deep the ocean is off Brisbane, where the continental shelf is, etc. Thx.

12 posted on 01/29/2006 9:52:09 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mtbopfuyn

"mishap" is standard navy lingo for an accident.


13 posted on 01/29/2006 10:03:06 AM PST by bethelgrad (for God, country, the Marine Corps, and now the Navy Chaplain Corps OOH RAH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham

With a son who aspires to fly fighter jets, I'm REALLY glad to read that the pilot is OK.


14 posted on 01/29/2006 10:24:53 AM PST by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arasina
You know what they say about carrier landings....

No matter how cool you look landing on a carrier, you're still stuck on a boat in the middle of nowhere with 5,000 other men when you're done.

15 posted on 01/29/2006 10:28:59 AM PST by Dashing Dasher (People who live in glass houses, shouldn't walk around naked... or throw stones....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

USS Ronald Reagan FA/18-C Aircraft Mishap
Story Number: NNS060129-01
Release Date: 1/29/2006 2:20:00 PM

By U.S. Seventh Fleet Public Affairs

BRISBANE, Australia (NNS) -- A single seat F/A-18C Hornet assigned to Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 25 and to Carrier Air Wing 14 was involved in a mishap while attempting to land on the flight deck of the aircraft carrier USS Ronald Reagan (CVN 76) approximately 120 miles southeast of Brisbane, Australia, Jan. 28 at approximately 4:17 a.m. (PST).

The pilot ejected safely and was recovered. There were no injuries.

The name of the pilot will not be released until next-of-kin have been notified. USS Ronald Reagan and the embarked airwing remain fully mission capable and ready to respond as required.

VFA-25 operates from Lemoore, Calif. The F/A-18C is a single seat, twin engine, mid-wing, multi-mission tactical aircraft.

The incident is currently under investigation.

http://www.navy.mil/search/display.asp?story_id=22109

16 posted on 01/29/2006 12:34:35 PM PST by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dashing Dasher

>>> 5,000 other men when you're done <<<<

The RR is a PC Co-ed ship.


17 posted on 01/29/2006 12:35:14 PM PST by quietolong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Clock King

"Since the US decided to not recover it, it probably has nothing of importance on it."

More likely the plane's in water too deep to go after.


18 posted on 01/29/2006 3:07:37 PM PST by roaddog727 (P=3/8 A. or, P=plenty...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mhking

Hi! Missed you!


19 posted on 01/29/2006 6:45:25 PM PST by T Minus Four (Some assembly required (but not as much as before!).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: quietolong

Sure, but it's a generality. And.. it's funny.


20 posted on 01/29/2006 9:47:09 PM PST by Dashing Dasher (Sell crazy someplace else, we're all stocked up here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson