[AlGone2001]

"Good. That means easier targeting."

That's so callous. Children no no better.

It just means another plan will have to be invoked.

This simply delays action.

[johnny7]

It won't 'delay' anything.

[TASMANIANRED]

The Jihadist would strap bomb belts to them without a qualm.

[RasterMaster]

Anyone who'd strap a suicide belt to an innocent don't exactly qualify as parents. If children are going to be used as weapons, they are a target just the same.

[oldbrowser]

"Good. That means easier targeting."
That's so callous. Children no no better.

We have children too.

Sometimes the choices are between bad and worse.

[ExtremeUnction]

It just means another plan will have to be invoked. This simply delays action.

Israel will consider Iran's new tactic. But when it comes to the survival of their nation, they would not allow a ring of children to stop their plans.

[nascar242005]

it is their Children.......or OUR CHILDREN if we don't grow some really quick.

[Walkingfeather]

I think you are wrong. If the choice is between iranian children and isreals own children as well as millions of others if it can be avoided it will, If it can't there will be no choice. No delay.

[mbraynard]

"Good. That means easier targeting."

That's so callous. Children no no better.

No, I think you are misunderstanding the parent poster. He means that the sites that they have put children around indicate they may be more valuable than sites they haven't children around.

However, I doubt that is the case and it is more likely a desception as they would let no cameras broadcast anything of their most valuable sites.