Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New York Civil Liberties Union Charges Catholic School (Pro-Life Group & ALCU Allies?)
Feminists For Life ^ | January 21, 2006 | Feminists For Life

Posted on 01/22/2006 9:19:25 AM PST by Kuksool

The New York Civil Liberties Union charged a private Catholic school in November with discriminating against an unmarried Catholic school teacher by firing her because she became pregnant. Feminists for Life supports the NYCLU in protecting women from pregnancy discrimination because it pits a woman against her own child by forcing her to choose between her career and her pregnancy, and because it effectively discriminates against female employees by providing a different standard as compared to similarly situated male employees.

According to court documents, Michelle McCusker was hired to teach pre-kindergartners at the St. Rose of Lima School in Rockaway Beach on September 7, 2005. Her teaching contract was to last for one year, but a month after school began, McCusker informed the school's principal that she was pregnant and planned to have the child. Two days later, the principal told McCusker that she was being terminated because she violated the school's religious principles by becoming pregnant while unmarried, even though she conceived before she was hired. The school principal said she could work only until the end of October. McCusker said she is "devastated by this."

"When an employer fires a woman for carrying a child to term, they send an unintended message: An abortion will cover up the sex," said Serrin Foster, president of Feminists for Life. "The compassionate response to a woman who is carrying a child should be to ask if she needs help, rather than cause a crisis for her by taking her career, her income, and the obstetric/prenatal care that is critical to the health and well being of both mother and unborn child. Women deserve better."

Feminists for Life believes that no employer should put a woman in a situation where she has to choose between sacrificing her education or career plans and sacrificing her children.

Foster asked, "How would the employer feel if they later learned that their actions contributed to pressuring Ms. McCusker into having an abortion?" According to Guttmacher Institute, Planned Parenthood's research arm, a lack of practical resources and emotional support are the primary overarching reasons that drive women to abortion. "Would they have fired her if they learned she miscarried under the stress, or if she had never become pregnant but her sexual activity was revealed? What if it was an unmarried man who fathered a child or a married father who had an affair that resulted in pregnancy? It is hard to imagine a situation where a man would have been treated the same for equivalent behavior," Foster added.

Other Catholic institutions, like Georgetown University, have worked over the course of many years to better accommodate pregnant and parenting women. Feminists for Life's first Pregnancy Resource Forum was hosted at Georgetown in 1997 and moderated by Foster. "We took an inventory of services and decided what was most needed. Within two years Georgetown trustees set aside nearby housing for parents, started Hoya Kids childcare, established a pregnancy hotline, and cross-trained counselors to address pregnancy resources as well as sexual assault and domestic violence." Since the first forum, the school has made significant progress toward meeting the needs of pregnant and parenting students on the Georgetown campus, and every year Georgetown hosts another Pregnancy Resource Forum to see what improvements should be made next.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: New York
KEYWORDS: aclu; catholicschools; feministsforlife; nyclu

1 posted on 01/22/2006 9:19:28 AM PST by Kuksool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kuksool
", even though she conceived before she was hired."

So she lied on her application.

2 posted on 01/22/2006 9:21:25 AM PST by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kuksool

Feminists for Life and the ACLU: allies against private property, free association, and freedom of religion.


3 posted on 01/22/2006 9:21:32 AM PST by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kuksool

This is a tough one. I've seen it before. You can't really have an out-of-wedlock teacher in a Catholic school teaching little children that intercourse is for marriage only. But, my guess is that it is not the pregnancy that got her fired, but the lack of disclosure when signing the contract that spells out the school's policy. That's fraud. I agree with the argument that the policy could lead to an abortion and therefore, I think a reassignment would be appropriate or if the teacher was willing to go through the trauma of openly stating her behavior was wrong, so as not to encourage it. There were other options, but I still think its a fraud issue.


4 posted on 01/22/2006 9:26:11 AM PST by Integrityrocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Integrityrocks

It's not "difficult" if you believe in freedom of religion and the good old American right to hire and fire.


5 posted on 01/22/2006 9:27:32 AM PST by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kuksool
If McCusker believes her rights were violated by being fired for being impregnated out of wedlock, I wonder how she feels about the babies right to be raised with a married mother and father.
6 posted on 01/22/2006 9:31:27 AM PST by jazusamo (A Progressive is only a Socialist in a transparent disguise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Integrityrocks
I agree with the argument that the policy could lead to an abortion...

It's really not that tough. If she is the kind of woman that would kill her unborn child to get or keep a job... then she really, reeeally, reeeeeeeeeally has absolutely no business teaching in a Catholic school.

7 posted on 01/22/2006 9:55:56 AM PST by D Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kuksool

Perhaps I'm too obtuse to see nuances as well as some but to me it's clear that if a private religious school discovers that a faculty member has blatantly and publically behaved in a manner contrary to the values it professes and purports to convey to its young students, it has every right to terminate such a teacher.


8 posted on 01/22/2006 9:58:41 AM PST by T.L.Sink (stopew)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kuksool
"It is hard to imagine a situation where a man would have been treated the same for equivalent behavior," Foster added.
Here we go, men are supposed to be out there defiling virgins as a matter of course, sheeesh! What ever happened to "employment at will"? My last ten years of work I worked under a signed agreement that I could be fired for any reason or no reason. I understood it and didn't worry about it. This lady knew going in that she had no business there.
9 posted on 01/22/2006 10:06:05 AM PST by n230099
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kuksool
Well, next time instead of having the child, the teacher will just get an abortion so that she could keep her job. But perhaps that's how we like it. All women who dare to have sex outside marriage should be forced to wear scarlet letters for the rest of their life.
10 posted on 01/22/2006 10:11:36 AM PST by Accygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing

Maybe she didn't have to lie on the application...it may not have occurred to the person who made up the application form to have a question that would force unmarried women who had recently become pregnant (but weren't showing it) to reveal that fact.


11 posted on 01/22/2006 10:18:36 AM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kuksool

No employer in their right mind will hire a newly-pregnant woman. If the ACLU was faced with two applicants, equally qualified, one was preggers and one wasn't, who would the ACLU hire? Let me guess...


12 posted on 01/22/2006 10:19:11 AM PST by AmericanChef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kuksool

ACLU: "We were for abortion before we were against it." ACLU: "We were against life before we were for it." I'm confused. Which is it? ;o)


13 posted on 01/22/2006 10:31:21 AM PST by NRA2BFree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kuksool

And I'm sure the ACLU would jump on this hypothetical case: a non-Mooslime female teacher hired by a madrassa who then refused to respect the tenets of Islam and was subsequently fired.



< crickets chirping/>


14 posted on 01/22/2006 10:41:29 AM PST by AK2KX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kuksool
The New York Civil Liberties Union charged a private Catholic school in November with discriminating against an unmarried Catholic school teacher by firing her because she became pregnant

They didn't join HER.....She joined THEM.

15 posted on 01/22/2006 10:42:52 AM PST by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puppage
I find it interesting that, on one hand, the ACLU "crusades" against any federal funding for Catholic schools and, at the same time, wants to control the operation of Catholic schools.

I bet if the Catholic schools would come out with a policy that defies the Church, supports abortion rights, homosexuality, free love, pedophiles, communism, etc., the ACLU wouldn't have a problem with them.
16 posted on 01/22/2006 11:01:46 AM PST by BW2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: BW2221
The ACLU argument would be since a Catholic school charges tuition, it is a business not a church.
17 posted on 01/22/2006 11:07:19 AM PST by Kuksool (A GOP Senate is needed to replace Justices Ginsburg & Stevens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Kuksool
Feminists for Life supports the NYCLU in protecting women from pregnancy discrimination because it pits a woman against her own child by forcing her to choose between her career and her pregnancy, and because it effectively discriminates against female employees by providing a different standard as compared to similarly situated male employees.

Eh, going after private schools for this is a bit nutty. The idea of equality presented here is mechanistic: anybody is a replacable part for anybody else, so long as they function as well. Since men and women have different, sometimes unequal roles, an egalitarian system must squeeze out role models in favor of functional models.

18 posted on 01/22/2006 11:45:38 AM PST by Dumb_Ox (http://kevinjjones.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson