Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kennedy Says Alito 'Itching to Overturn Roe v. Wade'
CNS News ^ | January 20, 2006 | Nathan Burchfiel

Posted on 01/20/2006 5:48:42 PM PST by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-171 next last
To: Kaslin

21 posted on 01/20/2006 6:06:04 PM PST by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Kennedy just scratching his ass again


22 posted on 01/20/2006 6:06:18 PM PST by TheEaglehasLanded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Angus MacGregor

Hilarious!!


23 posted on 01/20/2006 6:08:09 PM PST by Churchillspirit (Anaheim Angels - 2002 World Series Champions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

24 posted on 01/20/2006 6:08:27 PM PST by Angus MacGregor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
>>>>The group.... opposes Alito's confirmation because it fears Alito would cause "a profound shift in the ideological balance of the Court."

Not really. The next nomination PresBush gets to make and if approved, will most certainly shift the liberal court to a more conservative court. And I can't wait.

25 posted on 01/20/2006 6:08:44 PM PST by Reagan Man (Secure our borders;punish employers who hire illegals;stop all welfare to illegals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dbostan

You hope he overturns Roe v. Wade?

Although I am in opposition of abortion I respect a woman's right to choose. I realize that this may confuse you, but that does not concern me much because too many people in this country think that legislating morality is proper.

Abortion is a moral issue and the legislation of it has caused more harm than good. There are those who would consider abortion murder and think those who obtain it and perform it should be prosecuted as murderers. On the other end of the extremes you have the abortion rights liberals who say that it goes beyond just choice to convenience. They belive that the government should not only allow it but provide for it as well.

I sit pretty squarely in the middle of the debate. Although I oppose abortion on my own moral understanding of life and the constitutional rights to it, I also realize that abortion may be necessary at times. In the case of rape and incest, or to save the life of the mother. The mortality rate of premature babies is quite high, but there are many instances of doctors inducing labor of mothers at high risk of late term complications. This could be considered a form of abortion if the baby does not survive. But again, in my opinion this is a moral and not a legal issue. I can't agree with the pro lifers who call those who have abortions murderers. But I also think that the mother who has the abortion for purely vain reasons has done herself and her baby a moral injustice. But it remains a moral issue and, in my opinion, not a legal one.

The federal government should stay out of it and leave it to the individual states to decide where it lies.

In conclusion I would say that the right of choice that Roe v. Wade provides should not be overturned.


26 posted on 01/20/2006 6:09:03 PM PST by phoenix0468 (http://www.mylocalforum.com -- Go Speak Your Mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
>>The Senate should reject Alito's confirmation, the Massachusetts senator said, even though several Democrats have declared that they would not support a filibuster of the nominee...<<

It's not the Democrats who worry me. They are as predictable as gravity. It's the Republicans who may scatter like buckshot when they are faced with political pressure.

Muleteam1

27 posted on 01/20/2006 6:09:49 PM PST by Muleteam1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Any catholics out there know what their church's doctrine on abortion is?

Is this another example of hypocrisy from this sanctimonious bag-of-wind?

28 posted on 01/20/2006 6:10:41 PM PST by Churchillspirit (Anaheim Angels - 2002 World Series Champions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

29 posted on 01/20/2006 6:11:13 PM PST by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shakedown Street

Unfortunately Alito is just a small move. We still need one more SCOTUS appointment from W that replaces a Justice Kennedy or Ginsburg, for example, before we can consider ourselves safely veering from the liberal cabal of Souter, et al.


30 posted on 01/20/2006 6:14:09 PM PST by newzjunkey (In 2006: Halt W's illegals' amnesty. Get GOP elected statewide in CA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"Kennedy says..."

That's the Scotch whiskey talking.

31 posted on 01/20/2006 6:14:21 PM PST by Supernatural (All the truth in the world adds up to one big lie! bob dylan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: phoenix0468
>>>>Although I am in opposition of abortion I respect a woman's right to choose.

If that's your position, then you're pro-choice, aka.pro-abortion on demand.

32 posted on 01/20/2006 6:17:30 PM PST by Reagan Man (Secure our borders;punish employers who hire illegals;stop all welfare to illegals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

And, Swimmer, if Roe v Wade does get overturned? So what? Abortions don't stop, the matter just returns to each state for the citizens to decide, as it should be.

Sorry, Teddy, but we don't feel the Supreme Court should be an extension of the ACLU, no matter how much you do.


33 posted on 01/20/2006 6:18:35 PM PST by DakotaRed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

I remember reading that book about the accident years ago. The name of book now fails me. At any rate, it was flat out obvious that if it was murder. It wouldn't have taken much to save the woman.


34 posted on 01/20/2006 6:19:39 PM PST by mel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: phoenix0468

If morality isn't the basis for legislation, what is?


35 posted on 01/20/2006 6:19:57 PM PST by Moonman62 (Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Angus MacGregor

It looks like Captain Oldsmobile has lost a few lbs!


36 posted on 01/20/2006 6:20:00 PM PST by Carl LaFong ("I take care of the place while the master is away")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

"Alito's record is "clear and ominous," Kennedy said,"

Juxtapose those names for correct reading.


37 posted on 01/20/2006 6:20:02 PM PST by SeaBiscuit (God Bless all who defend America and Friends, the rest can go to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Did anyone expect the drunk to vote for Judge Alito?

I expect Senator Kopechne to ROW AND WADE.

38 posted on 01/20/2006 6:20:24 PM PST by SteveMcKing ("No empire collapses because of technical reasons. They collapse because they are unnatural.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Bogus NECK BRACES are itchy, Ted, not decent judges.
39 posted on 01/20/2006 6:20:30 PM PST by The Spirit Of Allegiance (SAVE THE BRAINFOREST! Boycott the RED Dead Tree Media & NUKE the DNC Class Action Temper Tantrum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Churchillspirit
Prohibition of abortion in the Church goes back to the first century AD.

More recently, "in 1995 Pope John Paul II declared that the Church’s teaching on abortion "is unchanged and unchangeable. Therefore, by the authority which Christ conferred upon Peter and his successors . . . I declare that direct abortion, that is, abortion willed as an end or as a means, always constitutes a grave moral disorder, since it is the deliberate killing of an innocent human being. This doctrine is based upon the natural law and upon the written word of God, is transmitted by the Church’s tradition and taught by the ordinary and universal magisterium. No circumstance, no purpose, no law whatsoever can ever make licit an act which is intrinsically illicit, since it is contrary to the law of God which is written in every human heart, knowable by reason itself, and proclaimed by the Church" (Evangelium Vitae 62)."

Details

40 posted on 01/20/2006 6:20:37 PM PST by newzjunkey (In 2006: Halt W's illegals' amnesty. Get GOP elected statewide in CA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-171 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson