Posted on 01/19/2006 1:47:52 PM PST by The_Victor
WASHINGTON - Two Democrats who supported Chief Justice John Roberts said Thursday they would oppose Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito in next week's Senate vote.
| ADVERTISEMENT |
The conservative judge is expected to be confirmed, but with fewer votes than the 78 Roberts got in September.
Democratic Sens. Patrick Leahy of Vermont and Ken Salazar of Colorado both questioned whether Alito would be independent of President Bush and the executive branch in his future rulings.
"At a time when the president is seizing unprecedented power, the Supreme Court needs to act as a check and to provide balance," Leahy, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, said in a speech at Georgetown University's law school. "Based on the hearing and his record, I have no confidence that Judge Alito would provide that check and balance."
Added Salazar in a statement: "Judge Alito would place too much power in the hands of the president of the United States, at the cost of the protective system of checks and balances built into our Constitution.
The Judiciary Committee, which has 10 Republicans and eight Democrats — is expected to approve Alito's nomination Tuesday in a party-line vote. The full Senate is expected to debate and vote on the nomination that same week, with its Republican majority confirming the federal appeals judge.
Leahy, Salazar and Max Baucus of Montana — who announced his opposition to Alito on Wednesday — were three of the 22 Democrats who voted for Roberts' confirmation as the replacement for the late Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, a conservative.
Alito is not expected to get that much support from the Senate's 44-member Democratic caucus. He was picked by Bush as the replacement for retiring moderate Sandra Day O'Connor, who was the swing vote on contentious issues such as abortion and affirmative action during her career on the court.
Several other Democrats are opposing Alito, including Tom Harkin of Iowa, Dick Durbin of Illinois, Edward Kennedy of Massachusetts and Barbara Mikulski of Maryland.
Sen. Ben Nelson (news, bio, voting record) of Nebraska is the only Democrat to announce that he will vote for Alito's confirmation next week. He also voted for Roberts' confirmation.
None of the Senate's 55 Republicans have announced opposition to Alito. Most _if not all — of them are expected to vote for his confirmation. They all voted for Roberts.
Independent Sen. Jim Jeffords of Vermont has not announced how he'll vote.
Alito is continuing to visit senators, spending time Thursday with Tom Carper, D-Del., and new Sen. Robert Menendez, D-N.J. Carper and Menendez have not taken positions on Alito's nomination. "I have reservations," Menendez said.
Sens. John Sununu, R-N.H., and John Warner, R-Va., announced their support for Alito after meeting with him Thursday.
"He understands the law and the Constitution extremely well, and I think one of the abilities he showed was to clearly describe how he ruled, why he ruled, and what factors were critical to particular cases," Sununu said. "That's an indication that his service on the court and his view of the Constitution is rooted in principle."
Added Warner: "In my view, Judge Alito's strong record and experience, coupled with his appearance before the Judiciary Committee, eliminates any question of the existence of extraordinary circumstances that would justify denying him confirmation by the Senate."
Democrats are a bunch of idiots. They don't realize that the judiciary is actually more of a check on the legislature than the executive.
GASP!
Why, I'm flabbergasted.
Flabbergasted I tell you.
I cannot remember when my flabber has been more gasted.
< /obvious sarcasm to most >
Anyone who can get away with voting no will. But too many Dems in red states to keep it veto proof. Ben Nelson says yes, sheets Byrd will have to say yes all we need are 3 more.
The RATS met in caucus Tuesday (or was it Wednesday?) What did they decide to do about Judge Alito?
Correction
There are too many Dems in red states to use the filibuster. Sorry about that.
They don't realize that the judiciary is actually more of a check on the legislature than the executive.
-----
Yes, they do. They are just obstructing not only Bush in general, but they do not want A REAL AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE as part of a blocking majority on the SCOTUS which will upset their LIBERAL ACTIVIST base on the court....
They cannot stand the fact that they are already beaten at this useless game.
Meanwhile the heads of the DU and Kos types are exploding as the filibuster threat fizzles away.
the RATS still think the american public is stupid enough not to realize that the script was written before the robert's nomination as to which RAT was going to vote how and when.
it won't be fun if the Rs cannot hold 50 votes for the rules change. don't be too confident that they can hold that either. remember the weaks hands we have to count on for the nuclear option - Snowe, Chafee, Voinovich, DeWine, Collins - we could lose all of them for the nuclear option. these RINOs saying they will vote for Alito, and voting for the rules change, are two totally separate things.
Booshwa! For Leahy this is par for the course, but Salazar is a bit of a surprise. Leahy and Schumer and Fat Ted must have made him some promises..... And on its face it's a nonsensical argument: Alito is going to call the White House for their position on every decision?
Just so long as he gets one more vote than he needs to have to be confirmed.
Salaazar is from Colorado which is a red state.
Maybe I'm crazy, but somehow my brain concocts the word 'sleazy' when seeing the names 'Leahy' and 'Salazar' in close proximity.
Republicans voted for him too, thinking he would be better than Coors.
Well, I hope the people in Colorado are happy now!
LOL!
What power did Bush seized? Yeah, the jackboots just visited my home last night and seized my telephone and computer records. Fricking Dems are insane.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.