Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Army Secretary: Guard will not be cut
United Press International ^ | Jan. 18, 2006 | NA

Posted on 01/19/2006 9:56:33 AM PST by neverdem

WASHINGTON, Jan. 18 (UPI) -- The Army is reorganizing the National Guard but not cutting any troops, the civilian chief of the Army said Wednesday.

"There is not going to be any reduction in the National Guard. Overall, the Army (and)... the active Guard and Reserve overall -- the military capability will continue to grow," said Army Secretary Francis Harvey.

Media reports in December about plans to cut between 25,000 and 30,000 Guard troops to save money for the Army engendered strong protests from Capitol Hill and state governors. About a quarter of Army troops serving in Iraq are from National Guard units.

Harvey said Army plans to have 106 National Guard brigades remains the plan.

"The number in the baseline plan was 106. The number today is 106. There is no change in the number of National Guard brigades," Harvey said.

However, the Army is shifting the mix of combat units and combat support units -- military police, emergency responders, engineers, civil affairs -- within that 106. The Guard now has 15 enhanced combat brigades. The Army originally planned to create 34 brigade combat teams, but will now create only 28; there will be six more support brigades created instead. Combat support brigades have skills useful in both warfare and domestic emergencies like hurricanes.

Harvey said there would not be a reduction in troop strength within those brigades, pledging to fund as many National Guard troops as the Guard can recruit and retain.

He said the response of the National Guard to the Hurricane Katrina disaster was a factor in deciding to change the mix of combat brigades to support brigades.

A brigade comprises about 3,500 troops.

The National Guard heads of the 54 states and territories wrote to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld on Jan. 5 asking that any proposals to reduce the National Guard be rejected.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: army; armynationalguard; armyreserve; francisharvey; harvey; katrina

1 posted on 01/19/2006 9:56:36 AM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Can't say about the Guard but the Naval Reserve is being abolished in favor of an all active duty force.


2 posted on 01/19/2006 10:18:56 AM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; Old Sarge
"There is not going to be any reduction in the National Guard. Overall, the Army (and)... the active Guard and Reserve overall -- the military capability will continue to grow," said Army Secretary Francis Harvey.

ARNG Ping

3 posted on 01/19/2006 3:15:40 PM PST by StarCMC (Old Sarge is my hero...doing it right in Iraq! Vaya con Dios, Sarge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem



US Army raises enlistment age to 40
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1561228/posts


4 posted on 01/19/2006 3:18:32 PM PST by TVenn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TVenn

Thanks for the link.


5 posted on 01/19/2006 3:27:35 PM PST by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy; Joe Brower; Cannoneer No. 4; Criminal Number 18F; Dan from Michigan; Eaker; King Prout; ..
Ready, aim, and fire more accurately without bullets

Insurgents use 'aerial' bombs to target U.S. aircraft

From time to time, I’ll ping on noteworthy articles about politics, foreign and military affairs. FReepmail me if you want on or off my list.

6 posted on 01/19/2006 3:34:09 PM PST by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Thanks for the ping!


7 posted on 01/19/2006 9:37:48 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TVenn

Raising the enlistment age is a good reaction to increasing numbers of fit and healthy middle-agers (and increasing numbers of cardiovascularly crippled couch-spud teens).

The next measure they ought to take is to increase retirement ages. We lose some good folks when they hit sixty.

d.o.l.

Criminal Number 18F


8 posted on 01/20/2006 1:45:03 PM PST by Criminal Number 18F
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson