[mewzilla]

Is this the redacted version?

[Howlin]

Yes.

[mewzilla]

Members of Congress are entitled to see the entire report.

And can do with the info what they wish.

I say we demand to know what's in the entire report.

There are 535 members of Congress. There has to be one honest critter up there.

[Hillarys Gate Cult]

Yes. The court blocked about 100 pages. Unless something was investigated and disproved, there's no reason to protect anyone. The taxpayers paid for this, we deserve answers.

The media will scream for release of the whole thing. Yeah. Sure. /sarcasm

[BigSkyFreeper]

Rather than explaining why the Clintons and former Administration officials were so reluctant to cooperate with the investigation (which ended up being the longest in history, at 10 years and $21 million taxpayer dollars), the paper instead chooses to ignore the fact that a panel of three judges “agreed to the public release of Mr. Barrett’s report but said the section with accusations about Clinton officials must be deleted.”

Source: NewsBusters: NYT Whitewashes the Barrett Report

[ElkGroveDan]

If you hold your computer monitor up to the light sometimes you can read through the blacked out redacted parts.