I'm watching that one.
Do you think the creators of this movie will be treated like hero's by the American left. The Canadians won't care because it will be more evil America hand wringing.
Either this film will not implicate Clinton, or else it will never be released. Take your pick.
I'm the last one to jump at a defense of the Clinton's, but this seems to go to far. Nobody was testing for HIV then ( as far as I know) and I'm all for a prison system making a buck on the back of the inmates. Crap, I can't believe I am doing this. Now I feel dirty all over.
Here for the BIG picture:
http://www.info-implants.com/tony/Implant/02.html
|
Related, current FR threads:
Clinton blood scandal exposed in new film.
Scandal of infected US blood revealed in film exposé (Clinton Linked to UK Bad Blood)
This film is probably why Bubba came out last week as the broker of "deal" with the drug companies for reducing the costs of AIDS drugs for Africa.
Timing is everything in the political world.
In the casting office in my mind, Kathy Bates has always been Kevin Ives' mother Linda, while Felicity Huffman is reporter Mara Leveritt (For the record: I invisioned Huffman as Leveritt before the existence of the show Desperate Whoreswives). However, I doubt Huffman, who is the darling of the politically correct now that she's played a transsexual, would risk her newfound glory in Tinseltown to take the role of someone hostile to Former President Elvis.
I need my own copy of this for posterity.
I have a sneaking suspicion that if the governor had been Republican, the state had been Texas, and his name had been Bush, this wouldn't be the least bit "contraversial".
Vincent W. Foster is another matter. He was very much involved in this case, as a bagman. At one point, in person, he offered a deal to Michael Galster (an orthopedist) concerning one of the inmates who had been horribly disfigured and was suing for millions of dollars. Galster told Foster to take a hike. Foster replied with a threat, that Galster would never get another job with the state of Arkansas -- making it clear that he was representing Clinton, not the company running the blood program.
When Galster later wrote his BLOOD TRAIL book, he may have guessed the truth about how the Foster character met his end. He wrote it as fiction but the way it played out, the whole section is spooky. But you have to read it and remember the Foster case to know what I mean :-)
Now I see the Clinton connection!
He had to be in there much more than a cameo appearance! Hmmmm?
An Arkancide, of course!
FReeper Boyd's Blood Trail links:
Depends on your definition of "murder".