Posted on 01/18/2006 4:40:02 AM PST by jimbo123
gee, i wonder if anyone will ask John Kerry why he assisted in having this report redacted and quashed.
When this was going on - Rush was about the only voice out there .. but now .. with the extensive talk radio and internet access to this information .. the Clintons can no longer hide their dirty laundry.
The REAL TRUTH of the Barrett report will come out - because some people have already seen the original report and know what parts were forced to be removed by the Clinton lawyers.
Bottom line is that it is INCOME to her and she needs to declare that income on her taxes....
When this was going on - Rush was about the only voice out there....Actually it was Joe Farrah of WND wo ho was out there first. Because he was the recipient of one of the first audits
Whether it is or is not income is an interesting question.
Is it payment for services, or a gift, or support of a dependent? Support of a dependent is not normally taxable. For example, you can give your child a place to live, a fancy education, and great food, costing hundreds of thousands of dollars a year, and there are no tax consequences.
Cash gifts are treated differently, but they are taxable to the giver, not the recipient.
In any event it needs to be declared...payment for services rendered, silence, gifts etc, the taxes need to be paid period and there is no latitude. Failure to delcare this the tax fraud
Actually, Cisneros was the one being investigated...on the face of it, he didn't have the income to spend the money he was spending. That's a red flag for the IRS.
Another close friend of Hitlery's, Doris Meisner, headed up the INS and let Mohammed Atta and the boys enter the US on student visas that they overstayed in order to plan their attack on 9/11. That cost us 3,000 lives and trillions of dollars in the aftermath. Jamie Gorelick was busy in the Justice Dept. building the wall between the FBI and CIA to protect the Clinton/China nexus. How many FOHs endangered our country during the Clinton years? Inquiring minds want to know. That should definitely make an interesting campaign ad when the Hildabeast runs in '08, but the panty-twisting Republicans would be afraid of mentioning the treason of the Clinton years.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.