Posted on 01/17/2006 10:00:21 AM PST by Cindy_Cin
(CNSNews.com) - As announced last week, the Senate Judiciary Committee was scheduled to meet today -- Tuesday -- to vote on the nomination of Judge Samuel Alito to the U.S. Supreme Court. But it's not going to happen as planned.
Despite protests from Republicans, Democrats on the committee have pushed back the Judiciary Committee vote by one week, to Tuesday, Jan. 24, invoking their right to do so under Senate rules
(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...
from National Review Online:
"Re: Democrats Delay Alito
[Ed Whelan 01/17 12:44 PM]
Does this reason (from today's Washington Post article) that Democrats state for delaying Alito's confirmation make any political sense:
**"Democrats, anticipating that Alito ultimately will be confirmed, are trying to deny the White House that victory as long as possible, particularly in the days before the State of the Union address President Bush is to deliver Jan. 31. Although Senate rules do not enable them to defer the confirmation vote until after the speech, Democratic senators would like to reduce the victory period immediately before the speech, one of the broadest public stages the president commands each year.
The State of the Union "is the 800-pound gorilla lurking over the debate," said Jim Manley, spokesman for Senate Minority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.). "That's part of the strategic calculation." Manley also said, "This is an important vote, and we are not going to be rushed into anything.""**
It would seem to me that Alito's confirmation is going to be a moment of great triumph for President Bush and that the closer that confirmation is to the State of the Union address, the better it will be politically for the President and Republicans generally. My bet is that the Democrats are delaying out of frustration and spite, not as part of any sensible strategy. Oh, well — that's how they've earned their minority status."
http://bench.nationalreview.com/archives/087513.asp
Precisely.
They delayed just after the state of the union address to take away one achievement in Bush's speech.
I sure wish republicans ran the senate.
"I do not see a likelihood of a filibuster," said Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif. "This might be a man I disagree with, but it doesn't mean he shouldn't be on the court." She said she will not vote to confirm the appeals court judge, based on his conservative record. First she states that she doesn't think that ideology should keep Alito of the court, but then she states that she won't vote for him, based on his record. I guess she thinks that his record is different than his ideology.
Let em have their week, we have Alito for 30 years, and Teddies out of the owl club for life.
Does anyone know anything about this?
You got that right...
Disgusting.
The Constitution does not specify the date of the State of the Union address. The Senate should put forth a resolution requesting the President delay the address by 1 week.
From Article II Section III
Section 3. He shall from time to time give to the Congress information of the state of the union, and recommend to their consideration such measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in case of disagreement between them, with respect to the time of adjournment, he may adjourn them to such time as he shall think proper; he shall receive ambassadors and other public ministers; he shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed, and shall commission all the officers of the United States.
LOL I had to print that masterpiece
"Headline at www.cnsnews.com: Democrats Delay Vote on Alito Nomination.
"Just thought I'd write to see whether the GOP expects to take back the Senate in 2006? /sarcasm off"
I'm sick and tired of these bums who can't represent their constituents. My problem is I live in Illinois and have a fat chance of electing somebody who has core values. Sheeeesh!
Seems like a vast waste of "We the People's" resources and time by the democrat party of the USA....
during a time of war when brave 20 year old Americans are dying every day ....
Men who are unfit for the office they presume to advise the President how to fill..
Preen and posture before us to show that "checks and balances", to them, means being able to use their powers of office to say "NEENER NEENER NEENER" to the President.
Whatever.
Senate of the US, how many North Koreans starved and froze to death in political prisoner camps last night?
Why do we need a Republican majority again? What passes for Republican "leadership" is tacit in allowing the Dems to continue calling the shots.
If we elected critters from any zoo in the country as our Republican representatives, we would have about the same caliber of representation in the Senate. I don't see a difference. One major plus, however, we wouldn't have to listen to them telling us how wonderful they are.
As a result, many key administration positions went unfilled for months - FBI Director Mueller was confirmed only a couple of weeks before 9/11. The Democrats have consistently played political games at the expense of national security.
I have news for the Democrats - I will never forget.
n a statement released Monday evening, Sen. Patrick Leahy, the ranking Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, explained the one-week delay as an arrangement that "accommodates Republicans and Democrats" who might otherwise have to "rush back to Washington" after the three-day holiday weekend.
Riiiiiiiiiight......what about the rest of us that had to "rush back to work" after the long weekend? Don't make it back by roll-call...you don't get to vote....buncha whiners.
I can only meekly hope the Republicans allowed the DemocRATS to do this to expose more "Obstruction" from the Senate Dems. Sadly, Its more likely, our GOP "leaders" has succumbed yet again to the Bullies.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.