Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE PLATE ESCAPE (outlawed clear spraypaint helps NYers beat traffic cams)
http://www.nypost.com/news/regionalnews/60437.htm ^ | January 15, 2006 | ANGELA MONTEFINISE

Posted on 01/15/2006 10:36:28 AM PST by presidio9

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-138 last
To: doug from upland
You don't think people should work to change this law if they don't like it?

Well, people can do whatever they want. My point is that repealing laws like this that have been carefully crafted and put into place are not likely to be repealed.

In fact, the likelihood is near zero.

121 posted on 01/15/2006 4:07:09 PM PST by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

If they outlaw paint, only outlaws will have paint.


122 posted on 01/15/2006 4:07:15 PM PST by NCLaw441
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

I don't know why I always like your posts elkfersupper... But I do! You are correct, trying to repeal onerous traffic laws, regulation, or enforcement that borders on tyranny is very very difficult. "Conservatives" posting on FR are so law and order oriented that they support "no knock" entries, roadblocks, cameras, and speed traps. Now don't misunderstand, I am firmly opposed to dangerous driving habits such as aggressive driving, non courteous behavior on the roads, tail gating etc. But most of the traffic enforcement or "traffic calming" measures I see are designed to maximize city revenue and or control, not intended to promote safety. Try and oppose signal cameras, or cops hiding in the bushes at the bottom of steep hills, or speed zones that come on suddenly. You will be amazed at all the "law and order" conservatives that will defend the right of the government to stop you, search you, and file you away for future reference and revenue at the whim of an 18 year old high school dropout.


123 posted on 01/15/2006 4:28:20 PM PST by DariusBane (I do not separate people, as do the narrow-minded, into Greeks and barbarians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Screw the cameras and those who ordered them put in place.


124 posted on 01/15/2006 4:30:22 PM PST by DoNotDivide (Were the American Revolutionaries rebelling against Constituted Authority and thereby God? I say no.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DariusBane

Glad to have you aboard, neighbor and FRiend!


125 posted on 01/15/2006 4:38:23 PM PST by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
"This enables someone to run a red light and not get caught. It's that simple. It creates a safety hazard," he said.

This doesn't "allow people to run red lights" with impunity as this guy states. What is wrong with having the police actually do their job and nail the people running red lights the way it used to be done? Accidents have increased in the cities that utilize these cameras. There will be no more people running red lights now than in the past before cameras. The safety hazard will not increase and some accidents will go down.

Cameras are nothing but a revenue increaser, authorities don't give a crap about decreasing accidents as evidenced in the way they ignore the statistics and reality of the cameras, they care about increasing fines.

126 posted on 01/15/2006 4:58:54 PM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigsigh

as a libertarian, if the way is clear after stop, then why not... personal responsibility comes with operating the car and libertarian thinking... right on red after stop... why not left and straight as well... if the coast is clear.

teeman

flame away but many a night i have waited at a red light when no traffic was in sight.

cameras that manipulate yellows are the only profitable cameras... lengthen the yellows and eliminate the revenue.


127 posted on 01/15/2006 5:08:00 PM PST by teeman8r
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: DakotaGator

Very well said, I agree!


128 posted on 01/15/2006 5:08:24 PM PST by Gerish (Choose God, he has already chosen you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
You are wrong, several rulings have made it clear the owner gets the ticket unless the owner has very positive proof. If you are lucky and the driver's picture shows in the photo you can sometimes talk your way out of it, most of the time it is TS for the owner no matter who was driving.

In Sacramento the police were forced to stop sending fines because of law suits. I think they can send them again now but no longer live there so I can't say for sure.

129 posted on 01/15/2006 5:10:35 PM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: teeman8r
you can give a pure idealistic libertarian answer and I understand it on that level. Or you can give the libertarian who understands traffic flow, especially at a busy intersection answer.

The problem with being a 100% literal libertarian is that sometimes you have to leave your house.

130 posted on 01/15/2006 5:19:46 PM PST by bigsigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr
Next you'll want to bring back summary execution because someone says you're a heretic.

Only the evolutionists want that.

131 posted on 01/15/2006 5:21:57 PM PST by Dan(9698)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
"Or is just all about legalized drugs 24/7 for you?"

You're right. You never ACCUSED me of anything. I guess I misunderstood the simple words that came out of your mouth. You're like a pitcher who throws curve balls and when someone hit's it out of the park, you claim it was a fast ball that you took a little off.

132 posted on 01/15/2006 5:24:35 PM PST by bigsigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: DakotaGator
Excellent dissertation on civil disobedience and our natural sovereignty in this country. Thanks.
133 posted on 01/15/2006 6:48:43 PM PST by T. P. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: DakotaGator
>"The People" across the country have not accepted traffic-light cameras. By their actions they are declaring it "wrong". They do not need to justify this. "The People" are sovereign. They dictate. Obviously the political whores aren't listening.

Thus Civil Disobedience.

"The People" across the country in many Black areas have not accepted traffic-light cameras. the moral wrong of robbing and killing Whites. By their actions they are declaring it IS NOT "wrong". They do not need to justify this. "The People" are sovereign. They dictate. Obviously the political whores aren't listening.

Thus Civil Disobedience Libertarian Mental Masterbation.

134 posted on 01/15/2006 8:11:38 PM PST by MindBender26 (Having my own CAR-15 in RVN meant never having to say I was sorry....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

It's all about pork to buy votes and generating more revenue to buy even more votes. on the City Council you have Billy Bob, who knows someone who knows someone who's company needs a nice juicy contract to supply camera equipment in exchange for a campaign contribution.

Ergot, ABC electronics now has cameras at intersections all over the city. All for public safety of course.


135 posted on 01/15/2006 8:25:53 PM PST by IranIsNext
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
Heaven forbid people should have to obey traffic laws

They would obey them more if there weren't so draconian.

Realistically, how fast do you think 25 mph is, which is the most common speed limit on most city streets? I mean, that's barely touching the accelerator speed.

Plus school zones. I can see slowing down on school days, but even on weekends and evenings these are still enforced. Nothing but cash cow for local governments.

136 posted on 01/15/2006 8:32:33 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (None genuine without my signature)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bigsigh
I'm sure you'll get a lot of Libertarians advocating the right to run red lights.

That's because big-government Republicans erect stoplights up on every intersection.

137 posted on 01/15/2006 8:37:42 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (None genuine without my signature)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Except during rush hours, the average speed limit on NYC streets seems to be something slightly below "light."


138 posted on 01/15/2006 8:47:56 PM PST by presidio9 (Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-138 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson