To: billorites
This guy ain't the Lamb, though. He only thinks he is.
2 posted on
01/14/2006 10:06:57 AM PST by
Brilliant
To: billorites
"......the supposedly intransigent George Bush has actually been so accommodating to European sensibilities that he has delegated the policy on Iran to Europe. This has produced the current disaster....."
I really don't know what it is with us Europeans - we seem to have it in out psyche to believe that anyone and everyone is susceptible to reason. That everyone at base is a jolly good chap and if only dictators, and fascist mullahs would see sense everything would be OK.... If we are deluded like that (along with your dear Democrats) why trust us with Iran - it was always going to end in tears. Negotiate? Tea anyone?
3 posted on
01/14/2006 10:11:38 AM PST by
vimto
(Life isn't a dry run)
To: billorites
What can we do? There may be sanctions and other forms of isolation that would work. Oh, my. Sanctions. That would certainly work.
Even better, how about more talk, which Europe is so good at? That would please everyone, at least until the nuclear bombs start going off.
4 posted on
01/14/2006 10:13:03 AM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: billorites
Sanity from a Euro?
Wow, at least some of thm have it figured out.
Cheers,
knewshound
5 posted on
01/14/2006 10:19:16 AM PST by
knews_hound
(Now with two handed typing !)
To: billorites
With respect to Iran: I was wondering if all the statements about nuclear weapons from Iran is designed to keep the US from noticing what Iran is doing in Iraq. We are dealing with cunning devils and obvious moves may not be the ones which we need to watch.
Also, as an old Internet user, I clearly recall that Iran was supposed to have bought 4 land mobile ICBMs from the old Soviet Union when it dissolved together with the technicians to maintain and operate them. The CIA had pics if I recall properly. One can guess the targets for 4 ICBMs. Any recollections.
To: billorites
"Promised One". This was a reference to the strong Shi'ite belief in a Mahdi, or Hidden Messenger, who will reappear in the world to rule it aright. I don't think the Muslim/Arab world will buy a Persian Mahdi.
If Mr Ahmadinejad can be packaged to Europe as a religious nut maybe they will do something.
9 posted on
01/14/2006 10:42:55 AM PST by
Mike Darancette
(Mesocons for Rice '08)
To: billorites
Question to Europe:
Since Iran is in your back yard; why don't you clean up the dog poop?
17 posted on
01/14/2006 12:10:47 PM PST by
Cobra64
To: billorites
Ahmadinejad is simply repeating the standard Shi'ite doctrine about the Mahdi appearing at the end of time to kill all the nonmuslims, convert the rest, and rule over the earth in a shar'ia utopia for a while until the final trumpets sound.
But he is not alone. For decades Muslims have been flooded with propaganda that these are the End Times. Certainly thousands, perhaps millions of them believe it.
It is extremely dangerous to mix nuclear weapons with the belief that there is NO FUTURE.
The Sunnis have their own version of the Mahdi: instead of being the 12th Shi'ite Imam, he will be a restorer of the Caliphate, who will spread Islam world-wide.
For more information on Muslim millennialism, see here.
20 posted on
01/14/2006 9:44:52 PM PST by
Dajjal
To: billorites
"an international conference designed to prove that the Holocaust never happened"
Now there's a thought - just think of all the nasty that will be concentrated in that place. Then think about the glories of the global positioning system...
21 posted on
01/14/2006 9:52:27 PM PST by
JasonC
To: billorites
This was a reference to the strong Shi'ite belief in a Mahdi, or Hidden Messenger, who will reappear in the world to rule it aright. This 'Hidden Messenger' could be the one that Christians are also waiting for, the 'AntiChrist'.
Certainly makes one wonder.
24 posted on
01/14/2006 9:59:41 PM PST by
Dustbunny
(Freedom prospers when religion is vibrant and the rule of law under God is acknowledged. The Gipper)
To: billorites
"when we help their victims rise up against them, when the people themselves, not our tanks, take down the Berlin Wall."
This guy is not Gorby. When the people rose up against Chinese communism, they got crushed by tanks. When the people rose up against Saddam, like we asked them to, they got crushed by tanks. Tyrants don't rule because nobody challenges them. They rule because nobody takes away their physical means of slaughtering those who challenge them.
25 posted on
01/14/2006 10:01:56 PM PST by
JasonC
To: billorites
Geeze, maybe Europe is attempting to emulate Nero with all the fiddling that is going on.
27 posted on
01/14/2006 10:12:31 PM PST by
Dustbunny
(Freedom prospers when religion is vibrant and the rule of law under God is acknowledged. The Gipper)
To: billorites
But the bigger question concerns the West's extraordinary indulgence (Mr Straw calls it "patience") towards the regime. Why don't we distinguish government from people and reach out to the latter? In the contest of the West with revolutionaries, we win in the end when we help their victims rise up against them, when the people themselves, not our tanks, take down the Berlin Wall. That's the answer to Iran - encourage and support revolution from within. Let Europe worry about nukes - they're within range. If Paris gets hit - we'll have plenty of time and opportunity to retaliate.
28 posted on
01/14/2006 10:13:08 PM PST by
Sunsong
To: billorites; SJackson; yonif; Simcha7; American in Israel; Slings and Arrows; judicial meanz; ...
33 posted on
01/15/2006 7:34:11 PM PST by
Salem
(FREE REPUBLIC - Fighting to win within the Arena of the War of Ideas! So get in the fight!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson