Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wm_tate
Under Clinton, NY Times called surveillance “a necessity.”

Not only do they adamantly oppose it now, most lamestream media don't even call it "surveillance.' They refer to it as "spying," which sounds a bit more evil.

14 posted on 01/12/2006 11:13:36 AM PST by Living Free in NH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Living Free in NH
Not only do they adamantly oppose it now, most lamestream media don't even call it "surveillance.' They refer to it as "spying," which sounds a bit more evil.

Actually, there is a bit of a difference. Surveillance is more general, the way Echelon was (or is). Spying targets someone or something more specifically, with an objective in mind.

Personally I consider domestic surveillance, on balance, to be more sinister than domestic spying.

16 posted on 01/12/2006 3:20:05 PM PST by inquest (If you favor any legal status for illegal aliens, then do not claim to be in favor of secure borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson