-
bump. let's deluge them with email and calls. It's hard to believe those two republicans were snookered. Certainly the lack of action on the part of the GOP leaders in the House and the Senate doesn't pass the smell test. The problem is the professional politician. We've really got to get rid of the careerist in DC. Entrenched power and corruption aside, they are a mediocre lot. The only real swing vote, the vote missus clinton MUST get to have any chance of winning, is the white woman. That demographic will NEVER vote for her if it is fully informed about:
- the clintons' RAPES AND PREDATION
- the clintons' ABUSE OF THE IRS
- the clintons' ABJECT FAILURE TO CONFRONT TERRORISM
- and this, nuclear proliferation as policy, if you can believe it. (The alternative explanation for the wholesale release of our nuclear secrets, no less moronic, is far less benign.)
- For more than a half decade, the Clinton administration was shoveling atomic secrets out the door as fast as it could, literally by the ton. Millions of previously classified ideas and documents relating to nuclear arms were released to all comers, including China's bomb makers.
-
William J. Broad
Spying Isn't the Only Way to Learn About Nukes,
The New York Times, May 30, 1999 Broad would have us believe we are watching "Being There" and not "The Manchurian Candidate." His argument is superficially appealing as most reasonable people would conclude that it requires the simplemindedness of a Chauncy Gardener (in "Being There") to reason that instructing China and a motley assortment of terrorist nations on how to beef up their atom bombs and how not to omit the "key steps" when building hydrogen bombs would somehow blunt and not stimulate their appetites for bigger and better bombs and a higher position in the power food chain. But it is Broad's failure to fully connect the dots -- clinton's wholesale release of atomic secrets, decades of Chinese money sluicing into clinton's campaigns, clinton's pushing of the test ban treaty, clinton's concomitant sale of supercomputers, and clinton's noxious legacy -- that blows his argument to smithereens and reduces his piece to just another clinton apologia by The New York Times. But even a Times apologia cannot save clinton from the gallows. Clinton can be both an absolute (albeit postmodern) moron and a traitor. The strict liability Gump-ism, "Treason is as treason does" applies. The idea that an individual can be convicted of the crime of treason only if there is treasonous intent or *mens rea* runs contrary to the concept of strict liability crimes. That doctrine (Park v United States, (1974) 421 US 658,668) established the principle of 'strict liability' or 'liability without fault' in certain criminal cases, usually involving crimes which endanger the public welfare. Calling his position on the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty "an historic milestone," (if he must say so himself) clinton believed that if he could get China to sign it, he would go down in history as the savior of mankind. This was 11 August 1995. Mia T, 2.11.04
BUSH, THE CLINTONS + WMD PROLIFERATION:
The REAL "Imminent Threat" HIROSHIMA'S NUCLEAR LESSON
bill clinton is no Harry Truman
DETAILS (Note, especially, what Harold Ickes said about the election of '04.)
(WHY HILLARY MUST NOT WIN. WHY HILLARY CANNOT WIN)
 When it comes to electing our first female president, we can do better than Hillary Clinton. We need to do better than Hillary Clinton, or the symbolism of a woman as president will be marred by electing a woman who has done almost as much to inflict mistreatment on real-life women as her misogynist husband.
Candice Jackson
Their Lives: The Women Targeted by the Clinton Machine
|
December 7, 1941+64
Dear Concerned Americans,  Hillary Clinton's revisionist tome notwithstanding, 'living history' begets a certain symmetry. It is in that light that I make this not-so-modest proposal on this day, exactly 64 years after the attack on Pearl Harbor.
The context of our concern today--regardless of political affiliation--is Iraq and The War on Terror, but the larger fear is that our democracy may not survive. We have the requisite machines, power and know-how to defeat the enemy in Iraq and elsewhere, but do we have the will? In particular, do we have the will to identify and defeat the enemy in our midst? Answerable to no one, heir apparent in her own mind, self-serving in the extreme, Hillary Clinton incarnates this insidious new threat to our survival. What we decide to do about Missus Clinton will tell us much about what awaits us in these perilous new times. EXCERPT
COMPLETE LETTER
AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, CHRIS MATTHEWS, MAUREEN DOWD + JEANINE PIRRO
RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton
Mia T
December 7, 1941+64
|
-
IT TAKES A CLINTON TO RAZE A COUNTRY
by Mia T, 11.14.05
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)
|
