Posted on 01/06/2006 11:07:29 AM PST by Stoat
|
|||||
Stones gig bans 'oldies' | |||||
|
|||||
By BECI WOOD
VETERAN rockers The Rolling Stones are too old to attend one of their OWN concerts - after organisers of their forthcoming Super Bowl gig banned audience members older than 45. The US National Football League (NFL) is offering 2,000 people a chance to watch the band in action at half-time during the final game of the season on February 5. But middle-aged fans and pensioners have been barred from the guest list because organisers fear they are not spritely enough to dance, sing and cheer. The controversial rule means the British rockers, who boast a combined age of 245, would be excluded from their own show. Adrian Thomas, spokesperson at Help the Aged said: "It's ironic that the organisers of a Rolling Stones gig should be so blatantly ageist when the band themselves are all well over 45. "The group have shown through their own long-standing success that age is absolutely no barrier to having a good time. "This ban is a completely daft and utterly unfair move on the organiser's part - there's no reason at all why a fan over the age of 45 cannot enjoy the show as much as a 25 or 35-year-old." An NFL spokesman, however, has defended the decision. He said: "You have to attend rehearsal and be able to stand for long stretches of time. "And you have to run on to Ford Field with 2,000 other folks." Do you agree with the NFL's decision? Email your views to www.yourviews@the-sun.co.uk |
How are THEY gonna get in?............
I've always got toenails to clean during the Super Bowl halftime show, but good grief, I'd ban anyone over thirty from being out there. It's not about whether or not the dancers are having fun, it's about whether or not people enjoy watching the dancers.
What a drag it is getting old...
Perhaps with creative disguises? :-)
Spot on.
"But middle-aged fans and pensioners have been barred from the guest list because organisers fear they are not spritely enough to dance, sing and cheer."
If the Stones plan on succeeding as a band, they will surely fail with polarizing decisions like this one.
People aged 45+ compose their central fan base, and alienating them like this is just insulting.
They might have trouble finding 2000 takers for the tickets :-)
"Does anyone under 45 actually like the Stones??"
They were becoming "old hat" by the time I got to high school, and I'm under their age cut-off, not by much, but I've got a few years left until then.
Keith Richards, over 45? Wow - you'd never know it to look at him...
"This is the beginning of their Steel WheelChairs Tour"
They've already been dubbed "The Strolling Bones."
"This ban is a completely daft..."
ANYONE who uses the word "daft" should not be allowed to watch football.
Why? Nobody in the age group <45 would recognize them anyway.......
"It would have been horrible."
It can't be any worse than watching Al-bot doing the Macarena.
They are all old enough to be grandpa's themselves. Who the heck are they fooling???
Maybe they'll be mistaken for a bunch of homeless drug addicted street people and be barred from entering the arena..........
I grew up listening to the stones in the 60's, 70's and 80's and although I would hardly call myself a diehard fan, I would be pretty out out by this. I'm only a couple of years over the limit but it is people my age and older that form the bulk of their fan base. This to me seems to be cutting off one's nose to spite one's face.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.