Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stones gig bans 'oldies' (Super Bowl Halftime show to bar attendance to anyone over 45)
The Sun (U.K.) ^ | January 6, 2006 | BECI WOOD

Posted on 01/06/2006 11:07:29 AM PST by Stoat

SHOWBIZ LATEST
Stones gig bans 'oldies'
Rolling Stones
Energetic ... Mick Jagger on stage
 
 

By BECI WOOD
Sun Online

 

VETERAN rockers The Rolling Stones are too old to attend one of their OWN concerts - after organisers of their forthcoming Super Bowl gig banned audience members older than 45.

The US National Football League (NFL) is offering 2,000 people a chance to watch the band in action at half-time during the final game of the season on February 5.

But middle-aged fans and pensioners have been barred from the guest list because organisers fear they are not spritely enough to dance, sing and cheer.

The controversial rule means the British rockers, who boast a combined age of 245, would be excluded from their own show.

Adrian Thomas, spokesperson at Help the Aged said: "It's ironic that the organisers of a Rolling Stones gig should be so blatantly ageist when the band themselves are all well over 45.

"The group have shown through their own long-standing success that age is absolutely no barrier to having a good time. 

"This ban is a completely daft and utterly unfair move on the organiser's part - there's no reason at all why a fan over the age of 45 cannot enjoy the show as much as a 25 or 35-year-old."

An NFL spokesman, however, has defended the decision.

He said: "You have to attend rehearsal and be able to stand for long stretches of time.

"And you have to run on to Ford Field with 2,000 other folks."

Do you agree with the NFL's decision? Email your views to www.yourviews@the-sun.co.uk



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ageism; entertainment; football; music; nfl; rollingstones; showbiz; sports; stones; strollingbones; superbowl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last
Although I used to be a fan, I've lost interest in recent years because of their poor song quality output and Leftist political stance. This effort to surround themselves exclusively with people young enough to be their own children is just another reason to relegate them to a 'jumped the shark into the dustbin of history' category.
1 posted on 01/06/2006 11:07:31 AM PST by Stoat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Stoat

How are THEY gonna get in?............


2 posted on 01/06/2006 11:08:59 AM PST by Red Badger (And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man's hand against him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
Does anyone under 45 actually like the Stones??
3 posted on 01/06/2006 11:09:44 AM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

I've always got toenails to clean during the Super Bowl halftime show, but good grief, I'd ban anyone over thirty from being out there. It's not about whether or not the dancers are having fun, it's about whether or not people enjoy watching the dancers.


4 posted on 01/06/2006 11:10:01 AM PST by Richard Kimball (How bout them Longhorns?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

What a drag it is getting old...


5 posted on 01/06/2006 11:10:10 AM PST by billorites (freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
How are THEY gonna get in?............

Perhaps with creative disguises?   :-)

6 posted on 01/06/2006 11:10:28 AM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
This is the beginning of their Steel WheelChairs Tour........
7 posted on 01/06/2006 11:11:38 AM PST by Red Badger (And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man's hand against him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Spot on.

"But middle-aged fans and pensioners have been barred from the guest list because organisers fear they are not spritely enough to dance, sing and cheer."

If the Stones plan on succeeding as a band, they will surely fail with polarizing decisions like this one.

People aged 45+ compose their central fan base, and alienating them like this is just insulting.


8 posted on 01/06/2006 11:12:04 AM PST by Emmet Fitzhume ("Without God, democracy will not and cannot long endure." President Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Does anyone under 45 actually like the Stones??

They might have trouble finding 2000 takers for the tickets   :-)

9 posted on 01/06/2006 11:13:13 AM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

"Does anyone under 45 actually like the Stones??"

They were becoming "old hat" by the time I got to high school, and I'm under their age cut-off, not by much, but I've got a few years left until then.


10 posted on 01/06/2006 11:13:16 AM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
Oh, us oldies will be able to watch the gig on TV...those of us who aren't using halftime to take a Niagara Falls leak, that is.

Keith Richards, over 45? Wow - you'd never know it to look at him...

11 posted on 01/06/2006 11:13:43 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

"This is the beginning of their Steel WheelChairs Tour"

They've already been dubbed "The Strolling Bones."


12 posted on 01/06/2006 11:14:16 AM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

"This ban is a completely daft..."


ANYONE who uses the word "daft" should not be allowed to watch football.


13 posted on 01/06/2006 11:15:55 AM PST by Blzbba (Sub sole nihil novi est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
Perhaps with creative disguises? :-)

Why? Nobody in the age group <45 would recognize them anyway.......

14 posted on 01/06/2006 11:17:24 AM PST by Red Badger (And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man's hand against him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
Good for the Stones.

They just spared the nation the agony of watching a bunch of decrepit Baby Boomers, on national teevee, pretend that they are still hip. It would have been horrible.
15 posted on 01/06/2006 11:17:34 AM PST by horse_doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: horse_doc

"It would have been horrible."

It can't be any worse than watching Al-bot doing the Macarena.


16 posted on 01/06/2006 11:18:56 AM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

They are all old enough to be grandpa's themselves. Who the heck are they fooling???


17 posted on 01/06/2006 11:19:09 AM PST by television is just wrong (Our sympathies are misguided with illegal aliens...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong

Maybe they'll be mistaken for a bunch of homeless drug addicted street people and be barred from entering the arena..........


18 posted on 01/06/2006 11:23:41 AM PST by Red Badger (And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man's hand against him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
It's blatant discrimination
19 posted on 01/06/2006 11:24:40 AM PST by George - the Other (400,000 bodies in Saddam's Mass Graves, and counting ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Emmet Fitzhume

I grew up listening to the stones in the 60's, 70's and 80's and although I would hardly call myself a diehard fan, I would be pretty out out by this. I'm only a couple of years over the limit but it is people my age and older that form the bulk of their fan base. This to me seems to be cutting off one's nose to spite one's face.


20 posted on 01/06/2006 11:24:59 AM PST by stm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson