Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Told NSA Briefings Broke Law (so says D-Jane Harman)
AP on Yahoo ^ | 1/4/06 | Katherine Shrader - ap

Posted on 01/04/2006 5:47:49 PM PST by NormsRevenge

WASHINGTON - The top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee told President Bush Wednesday that the White House broke the law by withholding information from the full congressional oversight committees about a new domestic surveillance program.

In a letter to Bush, Rep. Jane Harman (news, bio, voting record), D-Calif., said the National Security Act requires the heads of the various intelligence agencies to keep the entire House and Senate intelligence committees "fully and currently informed of the intelligence activities of the United States."

Only in the case of a highly classified covert action can the president choose to inform a narrower group of Congress members about his decision, Harman said. That action is defined in the law as an operation to influence political, economic or military conditions of another country.

"The NSA program does not qualify as a 'covert action,'" Harman wrote.

Bush and his senior national security aides have said that appropriate members of Congress were briefed more than a dozen times about the National Security Agency's domestic surveillance operations, which Bush first approved the month after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

The highly classified sessions are known to include the "Gang of Eight," which is made up of the top Republican and Democrat in the House and Senate and on the House and Senate Intelligence Committees.

"We believe that Congress was briefed appropriately," White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said Wednesday in response to Harman's letter.

Responding in writing to Harman, House Intelligence Chairman Peter Hoekstra, R-Mich., said Harman had never previously raised concerns about the number of people briefed on the program.

"In the past, you have been fully supportive of this program and the practice by which we have overseen it," he wrote. "I find your position now completely incongruent."

Many details about the scope of electronic surveillance program remain unknown. However, Bush and his aides have asserted the monitoring — without court warrants — is narrowly targeted to eavesdrop on calls and e-mails of people who are inside the United States and suspected of communicating with al-Qaida or its affiliates.

Vice President Dick Cheney said Wednesday that the program helped to prevent possible terrorist attacks against the American people: "This program is critical to the national security of United States."

Democrats who have been briefed on the program have raised serious concerns about its legality, but not called for its immediate halt. Republicans and Democrats alike have called for hearings this year.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 109th; briefings; brokelaw; janeharman; nsa; patriotleak; whitehouse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

1 posted on 01/04/2006 5:47:50 PM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

D is for DemocRAT

and Despicable


2 posted on 01/04/2006 5:48:24 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

And desperate.


3 posted on 01/04/2006 5:49:53 PM PST by golfisnr1 (Democrats are like roaches, hard to get rid of.>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
She is probably pissed that she didn't have a chance to leak it to the NYT first...


4 posted on 01/04/2006 5:50:47 PM PST by darkwing104 (Let's get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: darkwing104

Actually, she is the best they have and has been good about this. She must have been pressed to do this by the party hacks. As the response shows she never raised the issue and has been supportive of the program.


5 posted on 01/04/2006 5:52:12 PM PST by the Real fifi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

This is rich...Valerie Plame is covert, but a super secret NSA anti-terror surveillance program isn't.

Could anything make her look more stupid?

Duh.


6 posted on 01/04/2006 5:52:29 PM PST by A.Hun (Democrats suck worse than ice storms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Another alternative type to ignore.


7 posted on 01/04/2006 5:53:14 PM PST by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: the Real fifi

Or she is one of the leakers (which I doubt) and is trying to establish herself as a whistle blower. She does look foolish though, imho, and was clearly pressed to make this statement. Its completely of a statement she made last week regarding this and how important it is to our national security. The leaker(s) are clearly democrats, and they are beginning to circle the wagons to make excuses for the traitor(s).


8 posted on 01/04/2006 5:54:28 PM PST by Laverne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I saw this AP headline ... very misleading ... Makes it sound like they were instructed back in 2001, by the Justice Department, that the taps were illegal.


9 posted on 01/04/2006 5:54:31 PM PST by Mr. Buzzcut (metal god ... visit The Ponderosa .... www.vandelay.com ... DEATH BEFORE DHIMMITUDE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
I see Harman finally got the DNC memo.

What a joke. Spying isn't a covert action?

They must have come down on her hard, for her to put out such a stupid statement. The Dems are so transparent.

10 posted on 01/04/2006 5:55:52 PM PST by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Another Nice FAKE HEADLINE.

REAL HEADLINE: DEMOCRAT ALLEGES PROGRAM BROKE LAW WEEKS AFTER SHE SAID IT WAS FINE


11 posted on 01/04/2006 5:56:05 PM PST by new yorker 77 (FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

She supported the program just a few weeks ago. What Harman says can be ignored.


12 posted on 01/04/2006 5:57:33 PM PST by rwfromkansas (http://www.xanga.com/rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas

As I said earlier -- she is being pressured. The dems are circling the wagon because they know who the leaker is (Rockerfeller is my guess).


13 posted on 01/04/2006 6:01:07 PM PST by Laverne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

these rats care nothing about national security


14 posted on 01/04/2006 6:01:39 PM PST by vigilante2 (vigilant attentiveness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vigilante2
Congresswoman Noname Harman is irrelevant.

Her credibility is in the toilet.

It took her three weeks to spew the lib talking points.

The Pro-terrorist Dems are the best thing the GOP has going for them.
15 posted on 01/04/2006 6:04:25 PM PST by new yorker 77 (FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Democrat Harman defends Bush (program essential to security, disclosure damaged intelligence)

What's next, is she going to produce a letter that she wrote to herself in 2002?

-PJ

16 posted on 01/04/2006 6:04:34 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the Real fifi
She must have been pressed to do this by the party hacks

Of course.

17 posted on 01/04/2006 6:07:28 PM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Responding in writing to Harman, House Intelligence Chairman Peter Hoekstra, R-Mich., said Harman had never previously raised concerns about the number of people briefed on the program. "In the past, you have been fully supportive of this program and the practice by which we have overseen it," he wrote. "I find your position now completely incongruent."

In other words STFU you lying B****.

18 posted on 01/04/2006 6:10:50 PM PST by jveritas (The Axis of Defeatism: Left wing liberals, Buchananites, and third party voters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laverne
I am sure she got a very nasty call from the left wing Bush haters threatening her to either get back to the herd and savage the President or she herself will be savaged by them.
19 posted on 01/04/2006 6:14:00 PM PST by jveritas (The Axis of Defeatism: Left wing liberals, Buchananites, and third party voters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

And the truth shall set you free. Too bad Harman never bothered ready the ENTIRE National Security Act. If she had she would have read subchapter 3, sec. 413b, paragraph C part 2 which states "If the President determines that it is essential to limit access to the finding to meet extraordinary circumstances affecting vital interests of the United States, the finding may be reported to the chairmen and ranking minority members of the congressional intelligence committees, the Speaker and minority leader of the House of Representatives, the majority and minority leaders of the Senate, and such other member or members of the congressional leadership as may be included by the President."
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode50/usc_sec_50_00000413---b000-.html


20 posted on 01/04/2006 6:15:22 PM PST by zaggs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson