Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Added Ticktock of the Clock Restarts Time Debate
Washington Post ^ | December 26, 2005 | Guy Gugliotta

Posted on 12/25/2005 8:52:00 PM PST by indcons

Time marches on, but Earth is falling behind. The solution again this year is to add a "leap second" as 2005 ticks away, so Earth can catch up with the atomic clocks that have defined time since their unerring accuracy trumped the heavens three decades ago.

This will be the first leap second in seven years, and its arrival will be closely watched by physicists and astronomers enmeshed in a prolonged debate over the future of time in a world increasingly dominated by technology.

Some experts think the leap second should be abolished because the periodic, but random, adjustment of time imposes unreasonable and perhaps dangerous disruptions on precision software applications including cell phones, air traffic control and power grids.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: clocks; tick; time; timedebate; tock
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 12/25/2005 8:52:02 PM PST by indcons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: indcons

I bet the big unions will have a fit. Imagine a second of time multiplied by a million uncompensated members. Its a rip off of the little guy.


2 posted on 12/25/2005 9:00:45 PM PST by Lawgvr1955 (You can never have too much cowbell !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indcons

Ah, gee, not Y2K again.


3 posted on 12/25/2005 9:01:05 PM PST by D.P.Roberts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indcons

The only important question is: What Stardate is it now?


4 posted on 12/25/2005 9:02:23 PM PST by neodad (Rule Number 1: Be Armed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lawgvr1955

"I bet the big unions will have a fit. Imagine a second of time multiplied by a million uncompensated members. Its a rip off of the little guy."

LOL...


5 posted on 12/25/2005 9:03:34 PM PST by indcons (FReepmail indcons to get on/off the Military History ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lawgvr1955
"Its a rip off of the little guy."

And women and minorities are hit the hardest.

Of course, it is undoubtedly Bush's fault.

6 posted on 12/25/2005 9:05:02 PM PST by NicknamedBob (So now the plane's going down, and all MacGyver finds is a spork -- Who ya gonna blame? WBAL,"Larry")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: indcons

MAKE YOUR TIME.


7 posted on 12/25/2005 9:05:55 PM PST by RichInOC (HA HA HA HA....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indcons

Oh, please! Not Centons!!


8 posted on 12/25/2005 9:09:49 PM PST by NicknamedBob (So now the plane's going down, and all MacGyver finds is a spork -- Who ya gonna blame? WBAL,"Larry")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indcons

"...so Earth can catch up with the atomic clocks..."
Whaaaa? I don't think THAT is how it works.


9 posted on 12/25/2005 9:11:54 PM PST by Abcdefg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abcdefg
Check this out: "...prolonged debate over the future of time in a world increasingly dominated by technology."
10 posted on 12/25/2005 9:14:19 PM PST by indcons (FReepmail indcons to get on/off the Military History ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RichInOC

All your leap second are belong to us.


11 posted on 12/25/2005 9:35:50 PM PST by Lauren BaRecall (Rudy Giuliani is pro partial birth abortion...just ask Sean Hannity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: indcons
"...prolonged debate over the future of time....

How long will it take?

12 posted on 12/25/2005 9:39:44 PM PST by Lauren BaRecall (Rudy Giuliani is pro partial birth abortion...just ask Sean Hannity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Abcdefg
Whaaaa? I don't think THAT is how it works.

That's what I was thinking. I'm thinking that this is a really fancy way of saying that their atomic clock gained a second.

13 posted on 12/25/2005 9:52:36 PM PST by bad company ( Sorry, I'll try to act normal but I'm all I have to work with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: indcons

Wouldn't it be easier just to speed up the earth a bit? :-)


14 posted on 12/25/2005 9:56:17 PM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido

It is forbidden for you to interfere...


15 posted on 12/25/2005 10:05:02 PM PST by Darth Dan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: D.P.Roberts
Where can I buy some ready made meals real cheap? eh
16 posted on 12/25/2005 10:07:30 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: indcons
And unlike leap years or daylight saving time, software designers cannot plan ahead because leap seconds get added only when they are needed.

Uhhhhh ... didn't Congress just change how DST is handled starting in 2007, thus requiring updates to any computer (or VCR or DVD Recorder or anything else) which automatically handles DST? Arbitrary actions by Congress is not something designers can plan ahead for.

17 posted on 12/25/2005 10:08:42 PM PST by KarlInOhio (What is the most obscene gesture to a Democrat? An Iraqi voter showing him a stained finger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neodad
The only important question is: What Stardate is it now?

Depends on where you are in the galaxy.

18 posted on 12/25/2005 10:15:29 PM PST by golas1964 ("He tasks me... He tasks me, and I shall have him!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: indcons

Well, idiot state governments force people to switch their clocks twice a year for DST madness. That means it's whatever time the government says it is. And 2+2=5.


19 posted on 12/25/2005 10:30:14 PM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
Uhhhhh ... didn't Congress just change how DST is handled starting in 2007, thus requiring updates to any computer (or VCR or DVD Recorder or anything else) which automatically handles DST? Arbitrary actions by Congress is not something designers can plan ahead for.

This isn't really so much of an issue. Most computers for which such things are really important use UTC (formerly GMT) as their reference point for time. There is no "daylight savings" or other silliness in UTC time, thank goodness.

Unix-based computers, for instance, generally have clocks that run UTC. When you ask the computer what time it is, it checks for an environment variable called, appropriately enough, "TZ", then it calculates what it should be displayed based on the value of this variable. If this variable is unset, it checks a file called in the /etc directory called "timezone" and applies the calculation to that. If that file doesn't exist, it displays UTC/GMT time. This time is based on the number of seconds that have elapsed since Jan. 1, 1970. Leap seconds cause problems with this system because the conversion from the number of seconds since 1/1/1970 is actually greater than it was initially expected to be, thus in an absolute sense generating the precise date from the number of elapsed seconds gives an incorrect answer.

In a practical sense, this is generally worked around a number of different ways. I recently read a really interesting white paper about discussions that have occured at various IEEE and IETF sessions on the matter. One solution might be to include a lookup table that contains the dates that these leap seconds are added so the conversions would be more accurate. It actually all gets very cloudy inside the workings of how these conversions could or should be done, but it is an interesting problem IMO, as I've always been pretty interested in timekeeping, and the history of it.

We'll, that's probably more than you ever cared about reading about this stuff, so I'll stop now.:-)

20 posted on 12/25/2005 10:37:24 PM PST by zeugma (Warning: Self-referential object does not reference itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson