To: coconutt2000
I've found it to be an EXCELLENT source of info. I use it often. I've learned to be careful, as I am with all Internet info, but I'm very sorry to hear about this. These people (pedophiles) are trying to do their best to ruin our culture so that they can run amok with their filthy pleasures.
13 posted on
12/20/2005 1:25:24 PM PST by
twigs
To: twigs
Many of the Wikpedia articles are of merit. And one is free to edit them and discuss/debate the edits, which some obviously find stimulating. I and others were instrumental in changing the slant of Wikipedia's article on patriotism, which was written from the British and Eurowimp point of view and treated it as synonymous with jingoism. I was not aware of the articles dealing with pedophilia and would never defend them. I limited myself to the subjects of interest to me.
62 posted on
12/20/2005 2:06:57 PM PST by
luvbach1
(Near the belly of the beast in San Diego)
To: twigs; coconutt2000
I agree. I consult Wikipedia frequently.
I have found it to be quite valuable - especially when I went back to school a few years ago.
Everyone should know not to use it as an exclusive source of information. That goes for almost any source of information.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson