Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: coconutt2000

I've found it to be an EXCELLENT source of info. I use it often. I've learned to be careful, as I am with all Internet info, but I'm very sorry to hear about this. These people (pedophiles) are trying to do their best to ruin our culture so that they can run amok with their filthy pleasures.


13 posted on 12/20/2005 1:25:24 PM PST by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: twigs
Many of the Wikpedia articles are of merit. And one is free to edit them and discuss/debate the edits, which some obviously find stimulating. I and others were instrumental in changing the slant of Wikipedia's article on patriotism, which was written from the British and Eurowimp point of view and treated it as synonymous with jingoism. I was not aware of the articles dealing with pedophilia and would never defend them. I limited myself to the subjects of interest to me.
62 posted on 12/20/2005 2:06:57 PM PST by luvbach1 (Near the belly of the beast in San Diego)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: twigs; coconutt2000

I agree. I consult Wikipedia frequently.

I have found it to be quite valuable - especially when I went back to school a few years ago.

Everyone should know not to use it as an exclusive source of information. That goes for almost any source of information.


82 posted on 12/20/2005 9:31:42 PM PST by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson