To: Sub-Driver
People, do you really not understand what happened here.
Yes, they found the residue.
Then they let him go.
THEN THEY PUT HIM UNDER SURVEILLANCE.
Several Days later...They leak it out, and look to see who reacts...
16 posted on
12/08/2005 7:46:56 AM PST by
hobbes1
(Hobbes1TheOmniscient® "I know everything so you dont have to...." ;)
To: hobbes1
Bingo...you got it right....
Can't arrest for traces.....but you can surveill......better to get the entire cell than just one...
21 posted on
12/08/2005 7:49:59 AM PST by
nevergore
(“It could be that the purpose of my life is simply to serve as a warning to others.”)
To: hobbes1
This is a frowny face moment, however there is some value in letting him go. If he is placed under surveillance, and his actions and contacts are documented, he might be a key to a larger group of people who are engaged in criminal activities. (Little fish, big fish.) If he is detained and jailed or immediately deported, a chance to uncover the identity of others would be lost.
24 posted on
12/08/2005 7:54:37 AM PST by
Enterprise
(The modern Democrat Party - a toxic stew of mental illness, cultism, and organized crime.)
To: hobbes1
I hope I'm wrong and you're right.
30 posted on
12/08/2005 8:07:50 AM PST by
airborne
(Al-Queda can recruit on college campuses but the US military can't!)
To: hobbes1
THEN THEY PUT HIM UNDER SURVEILLANCE. Wrong! The Feds have apparently lost track of him.
To: hobbes1
THEN THEY PUT HIM UNDER SURVEILLANCE.
Several Days later...They leak it out, and look to see who reacts..."However, federal screeners didn’t tell any member of law enforcement what happened for days."
No chance.
78 posted on
06/04/2007 2:33:05 PM PDT by
brityank
(The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson