Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran, the bomb and Bush
The Washington Times ^ | 12-7-05 | Tony Blankley

Posted on 12/07/2005 11:51:30 AM PST by JZelle

Do you remember back a few months when it was reported that the CIA had determined that Iran was probably 10 years away from being able to develop a nuclear bomb? It was in all the papers, and made almost everyone feel much relieved. It certainly put those hot-head alarmists and warmongers in our places. We had been citing Israel's assertion that by the spring of 2006 Iran could have the bomb. My, how time flies. This week Mohamed ElBaradei, the chairman of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), confirmed Israel's assessment to the British liberal newspaper the Independent, and stated that if Tehran indeed resumed its uranium enrichment in other plants, as threatened, it will take Iran only "a few months to produce a nuclear bomb." Keep in mind, Mr. ElBaradei is not some wild bomb-thrower (so to speak). He is the same diplomat who the Bush administration recently, and unsuccessfully, tried to block from being reappointed chairman of the IAEA because he was insufficiently assertive and too inclined to understate the danger of nuclear development in Muslim countries.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: blankely; bush; iran; irannukes; mahmudahmedinejad; nukes; terrorism

1 posted on 12/07/2005 11:51:31 AM PST by JZelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JZelle
The worse part is we probably can't do anything about it.

Our best hope is to promote a revolution, but we are probably to far behind the curve and our CIA is too busy trying to undercut the admn. to do what they were created for.

Once the mullahs have the bomb, how long will it be before the terrorists have a device they can drive to Baghdad?
2 posted on 12/07/2005 12:06:32 PM PST by wmfights (Lead, Follow, or Get out of the Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JZelle

The same CIA that has consistently tried to undermine this administration is wrong again. It's obvious they're more concerned with leaking classified information to the NY Times than with accurate intel.


3 posted on 12/07/2005 12:17:11 PM PST by SueRae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wmfights

I think we will have to do something about it. I'm sorry that the Libs want to wait until a holocaust before doing anything about it. What they fail to recognize is that this holocaust won't occur over a period of several years. 3 bombs 6,000,000 dead Jews and the obliteration of Israel in minutes is why Iran cannot be allowed to develop nuclear weapons. I pick April Fools Day 2006 for the strike.


4 posted on 12/07/2005 12:19:51 PM PST by FEARED MUTATION
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JZelle
Oh the USA is soooooo weeeeaaaakkk...we just can't do anything about it oooooohhhhhh...We spend over 400 BILLION to support our military. If all they can do is fight one halfass war in Iraq, and then we're no good, I want my money back!
5 posted on 12/07/2005 12:31:55 PM PST by Edgerunner (Proud to be an infidel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wmfights

This is why our stopping Saddam was so important. IF you listen to the Dems, we were wrong to go after Saddam because there was no WMD (even though he had had them, had used them, and was planning on building it up again once the sanctions were gone.) The Germans and French had started to push for sanctions to be removed, but 9/11 happened. Had 9/11 NOT happened, Saddam would still be in power, with nukes just like Iran, threatening his neighbors and us. Had we NOT stopped Saddam, we would be facing TWO Islamic nations, Iraq and Iran, with nuclear abilities.

Bottom line...the Dems never want to stop nations from getting nukes until AFTER they already have them, at which time they say it is "impossible" for us to stop them militarily. They then urge "diplomatic" measures, as did Carter, which of course DOESN'T work (see North Korea) and our national security is compromised.


6 posted on 12/07/2005 12:32:58 PM PST by t2buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FEARED MUTATION
"I think we will have to do something about it."
___________________________________________

The problem is their nuclear development sites are widespread throughout the country and in some cases are pretty hard to get at.

We can't be sure about the quality of our intelligence because of gross incompetence at the CIA.

The admn. will not have the support of the PUBS in congress if we take unilateral action.

Iran is fortifying their air defenses and time is wasting. Once they have the bomb we can't do a lot.
7 posted on 12/07/2005 12:34:32 PM PST by wmfights (Lead, Follow, or Get out of the Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: t2buckeye

I shudder to think what the world would be like if we had not gone into Iraq.


8 posted on 12/07/2005 12:36:48 PM PST by ncpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: t2buckeye
"Bottom line...the Dems never want to stop nations from getting nukes until AFTER they already have them, at which time they say it is "impossible" for us to stop them militarily."
_________________________________________

I couldn't agree more!

The RATS, legacy media, and weak kneed PUBS are looking for sanctions and the UN to resolve this problem. After this fails it will be blame Bush time.

My point is if we're going to do something the time is now!
9 posted on 12/07/2005 12:40:19 PM PST by wmfights (Lead, Follow, or Get out of the Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wmfights

Bingo! But let's face it...even when we are doing as well as we are in Iraq...and we ARE...the Dems are treasonously against our own military and certainly against President Bush. Though we SHOULD do something about Iraq, I don't believe Bush will be able to do more than what he's doing now. And Iran KNOWS this. They listen to CNN and know that they can say and do what they want. Again...the Dems show how utterly incapable they are of defending our national security.


10 posted on 12/07/2005 1:06:20 PM PST by t2buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JZelle
The 10-year thing was always pretty silly - any modern industrial state is less than that away from a nuclear weapon if it cares to expend sufficient resources. It only took us three years and we didn't have any idea what we were doing.

Moreover, any such state that cares to expend the resources can distribute their program such that its component pieces will be exceedingly difficult to find, much less to stop. I believe Iran is such a case. And I don't see this ending in any other way than an Iranian nuclear weapon and an arms race in the region. One is reminded of the naval arms races between the Great Powers and of the futility of the League of Nations in stopping them.

The questions that must then be asked are (1) how crazy is Ahmadinejad, and (2) can the Israelis assemble a counterstrike credible enough to constitute Mutual Assured Destruction? As to the first, I certainly believe he's crazy enough to nuke Tel Aviv and take what comes. He may even be stupid enough. If he is both the second question may be moot.

11 posted on 12/07/2005 1:25:13 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wmfights

Of course we can stop it. The question is are we willing to pay the price? I think the price will be much higher later if we don't.


12 posted on 12/07/2005 3:19:13 PM PST by tomahawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
"The questions that must then be asked are (1) how crazy is Ahmadinejad, and (2) can the Israelis assemble a counterstrike credible enough to constitute Mutual Assured Destruction?"
______________________________________________

I'm not sure that the Israelis can do it because the program is too spread out. Also, do their planes have the range?

I think the Mullahs are nuts enough to use the bombs when they have a stockpile. However, I think their delivery system will be in a truck with a homicide bomber not a missile that can be traced right back to them.
13 posted on 12/07/2005 5:16:34 PM PST by wmfights (Lead, Follow, or Get out of the Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson