Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Big boost to battlefield operations [tank-based "shotgun" round!]
U.S. Army Public Affairs ^ | December 5, 2005 | Wakeland Kuamoo

Posted on 12/05/2005 11:02:45 AM PST by 68skylark

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 next last
To: Monterrosa-24

Earlier versions of the Abrams (M1, M1IP) had a 105mm main gun that would accomodate the 5 types of ammo (name 'em...and pass that station on TCGST!). One of the reasons why the tank Bn's in Korea were the last to convert to the M1A1 was due to the loss of that AP round with the 120mm.
In Iraq, my tanks carried HEAT, SABOT and MPAT. HEAT and MPAT were useful to a point. This "new" round will be helpful.
Adding a better TC and loader's Machine Gun stations would be more useful in my opinion...
A good article though!
Regards,


61 posted on 12/05/2005 11:53:46 AM PST by Thunder 6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: OkieDoke
Why tungsten? Weren't Claymore ball-bearings steel?

Tungsten is much denser than steel and retains more kinetic energy over distance, so it penetrates better at longer ranges. This is especially important with a round ball since they have poor sectional density (ratio of diameter to weight).

62 posted on 12/05/2005 11:54:05 AM PST by Max in Utah (By their works you shall know them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: English Nationalist
New? This was around in WW2.

Googling led to this Kiwi history piece, which refers to case shot in the 1453 siege of Constantinople (not sure which side), and recalls its use in WWII jungle warfare:

The Gun - Smoothbore Era 1550-1860: Projectiles

63 posted on 12/05/2005 11:54:24 AM PST by yatros from flatwater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: English Nationalist
New? This was around in WW2.

How true and also a Union/Rebel favorite during the Civil War!

64 posted on 12/05/2005 11:54:51 AM PST by democrats_nightmare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

The big headed nail would have a much reduced range compared to a box nail or finishing nail. A small headed nail would also tend to tumble in flight, giving it some characterists of the flechette.


65 posted on 12/05/2005 11:55:21 AM PST by RightWhale (Not transferable -- Good only for this trip)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: English Nationalist
I saw a similar cartridge at Gettysburg for a cannon. At the Union position at the top of Pickett's charge they have a display. They basically fired them at point blank range during deepest penetration by the South.
I'm guessing the new version has a bit more kick however!
66 posted on 12/05/2005 11:55:47 AM PST by HereInTheHeartland (Never bring a knife to a gun fight, or a Democrat to do serious work...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: saleman

Requiring greater velocity, as well. The German tungsten round was hard on barrels, but they were rifled.
Thanks.


67 posted on 12/05/2005 11:57:30 AM PST by OkieDoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Thunder 6

What is your opinion of the loader's turret mounted machine gun on the M-1. In Iraq has it seen effective use?

What targets are actually engaged with MPAT and which with HEAT in Iraq?


68 posted on 12/05/2005 11:59:59 AM PST by Monterrosa-24 (France kicked Germany's teeth out at Verdun among other places.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Max in Utah; Arrogant Bastard

Thanks for info.
Ever see the 'Long Tom' 155 on the hill at Ft. Riley, KS? Believe it was intended to fire a nuclear shell.
(Which led to the nuclear handgrenade theory, only `hitch'
being that they had to wire a Silver Star to the pin . . . )


69 posted on 12/05/2005 12:02:18 PM PST by OkieDoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Infantry Grunt 1968-69

You mean flechette. "Fleshette" is pretty descriptive though :0)


70 posted on 12/05/2005 12:06:22 PM PST by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Monterrosa-24

I can only speak for our unit's area of operations, over the past year. We didn't fire any SABOT (nothing big enough to expend a SABOT on), and IIRC we only fired MPAT once at a building. HEAT was the round of choice and usually what was battlecarried. We used HEAT on RPG teams, because they would hide in buildings or behind walls.
Main gun engagements were very rare in our AO (mostly urban), but the MG's got quite a bit of work. Everyone fears/respects the .50, but the M1A1 TC station has always been a disaster to operate. The loader's 240 is good, but he has no shielding when he operates it, so the kid is usually exposed when engaging targets. The COAX was great.
Regards,


71 posted on 12/05/2005 12:08:46 PM PST by Thunder 6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

The next time a bunch of tracksuit-wearing ski-masked AK-wielding idjits decide to dance in the street in Ramadi, how I do wish Mr. Abrams would come around the corner right about then and send one of these right down Main Street. You'd never see THAT on the evening news. (And in fairness, it'd be pretty hard to eat your hamburger steak after seeing what that would do to somebody.)

I love it. It's like Raid for jihadis. Kills bugs dead.

}:-)4


72 posted on 12/05/2005 12:08:51 PM PST by Moose4 (Liberals and vampires: Both like death, both hate crosses, and both are bloodsuckers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OkieDoke

Tungsten is more dense than regular steel.
This means that the balls will lose less velocity over longer ranges than lighter balls of the same diameter. The hardness helps a little, but not as much as it does on the penetrator rods.

Recently, there's been experiments with tungsten core bullets for the M-16/M-4 series rifles. 82+gr, IIRC, which can be loaded in magazine length cartridges. Holds more velocity over longer ranges, as well (not to be confused with the Black Hills 77gr loads). Very expensive and there's some experimentation with powdered (sintered) metal construction. It's very difficult (impossible) to melt tungsten into a copper jacket and you can't economically machine the bullet cores.


73 posted on 12/05/2005 12:10:16 PM PST by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: sit-rep
You could loan it out to hiredhand if he had any more trouble with cats.

Of course, this would be more practical:Chain Gun

74 posted on 12/05/2005 12:12:39 PM PST by verity (Don't let your children grow up to be mainstream media maggots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: grobdriver
True but grape shot is not canister and grape shot was rarely used on land battles of the Civil War. Grape shot was primarily used by naval gun crews. They behave differently and most of the canister shot used in the Civil War was mistakenly called grapeshot.

Grape shot

Canister

75 posted on 12/05/2005 12:14:21 PM PST by atomic_dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Malichi

That's where Humphreys went after a Yank artillery battery.


76 posted on 12/05/2005 12:16:57 PM PST by flying Elvis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

Maybe the wide head adds drag, keeping the pointed end forward?


77 posted on 12/05/2005 12:17:46 PM PST by printhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
An antipersonnel round for the Abrams. It's about time!
78 posted on 12/05/2005 12:20:04 PM PST by colorado tanker (I can't comment on things that might come before the Court, but I can tell you my Pinochle strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OkieDoke
Never been to Ft. Riley ... I've seen this gem at Aberdeen:

280mm M68 "atomic cannon". Here it is being fired:

I suppose you could call this an "anti-personnel" round ...

79 posted on 12/05/2005 12:21:31 PM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: verity

bttt!!


80 posted on 12/05/2005 12:22:18 PM PST by sit-rep (If you acquire, hit it again to verify...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson