Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Command Declares Global Strike Capability
NTI Global Security Newswire ^ | 12/4/2005 | David Ruppe

Posted on 12/04/2005 12:02:04 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity

Edited on 12/04/2005 12:04:13 PM PST by Lead Moderator. [history]

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Strategic Command announced yesterday it had achieved an operational capability for rapidly striking targets around the globe using nuclear or conventional weapons, after last month testing its capacity for nuclear war against a fictional country believed to represent North Korea (see GSN, Oct. 21).

In a press release yesterday, STRATCOM said a new Joint Functional Component Command for Space and Global Strike on Nov. 18 “met requirements necessary to declare an initial operational capability.”

The requirements were met, it said, “following a rigorous test of integrated planning and operational execution capabilities during Exercise Global Lightning.”

The annual Global Lightning exercise last month tested U.S. strategic warfare capabilities, including the so-called CONPLAN 8022 mission for a global strike, according to publicly available military documents.

CONPLAN 8022 is “a new strike plan that includes [a] pre-emptive nuclear strike against weapons of mass destruction facilities anywhere in the world,” said Hans Kristensen, a consultant for the Natural Resources Defense Council. Kristensen first published the STRATCOM press release on his Web site, nukestrat.com.

Military analyst William Arkin, in a column on the Washington Post Web site in October, wrote that the classified exercise involved the response to a radiological “dirty bomb” attack on Alabama by the fictional country Purple or allied terrorists. “In the exercise, Purple is a Northeast Asian nation thinly veiled as North Korea,” according to Arkin.

Maj. Jeff Jones, STRATCOM spokesman, said today that the exercise incorporated various scenarios and added, “Everything is fictional that we put in the exercise.”

Global Lightning employed command and control personnel, according to the STRATCOM release.

Global strike attacks could be launched from U.S. long-range bombers, nuclear submarines or land-based ballistic missiles, according to the STRATCOM Web site.

The new command was created Aug. 9 in an attempt to integrate broad elements of U.S. military power into global strike plans and operations.

That, according to an Arkin commentary in the Washington Post in May, could include anything from electronic jamming to penetrating computer networks, to commando operations, to the use of a nuclear earth penetrator. CONPLAN 8022, he wrote, is intended to address two scenarios using such capabilities: preventing a suspected imminent nuclear attack from a small state, and attacking an adversary’s suspected WMD infrastructure.

STRATCOM Commander Gen. James Cartwright said at an opening ceremony that the new command would help the country convey a “new kind of deterrence.”

According to the STRATCOM release, “The command’s performance during Global Lightning demonstrated preparedness to execute its mission of providing integrated space and global strike capabilities to deter and dissuade aggressors and when directed, defeat adversaries through decisive joint global effects in support of STRATCOM missions.”

According to Arkin’s article in May, CONPLAN 8022 was completed in 2003, “putting in place for the first time a pre-emptive and offensive strike capability against Iran and North Korea.”

STRATCOM’s readiness for global strike was certified to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and President George W. Bush in January 2004, Arkin reported.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
Can you hear me now, Kim?
1 posted on 12/04/2005 12:02:04 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

....buh bye Iran!!!!


2 posted on 12/04/2005 12:06:38 PM PST by SweetCaroline ("You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich...Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
He won't be ronery if he's dead.


3 posted on 12/04/2005 12:07:25 PM PST by doug from upland (The troops will come home when the mission is complete)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

Well, with our ICBM's, SLBMs, and the B-2s and B-1s, this was a foregone conclusion.


4 posted on 12/04/2005 12:09:43 PM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SweetCaroline

But how could this be? The alphabet networks and Donald Trump keep saying that Bush is doing nothing about Korea and Iran. :)


5 posted on 12/04/2005 12:10:09 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity ("Sharpei diem - Seize the wrinkled dog.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

Any details as to how quickly the various types of lightning strikes could be? Say, like 15-30 minutes max to any one location? If I were a middle eastern (or south asian) Islamofascist, I wouldn't be able to sleep at night knowing U.S. submarines lying dormant in the Indian Ocean or South China Sea could launch several dozen nuclear tipped missiles anywhere in my direction, in a matter of minutes. A nightmare scenario, indeed. How pleasant.


6 posted on 12/04/2005 12:17:33 PM PST by john drake (roman military maxim: "oderint dum metuant, i.e., let them hate, as long as they fear")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

So, whats new? We had global strike capabilities 40 years ago! Re-stating the obvious, in case they weren't paying attention, probably.


7 posted on 12/04/2005 12:23:08 PM PST by Don Carlos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

So Ronrey
8 posted on 12/04/2005 12:28:10 PM PST by ChadGore (VISUALIZE 62,041,268 Bush fans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

True, but it never hurts to prod them with a big stick......just to make sure they are awake.


9 posted on 12/04/2005 12:29:25 PM PST by stephenjohnbanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Don Carlos

> So, whats new?

Possibly as little as rapid centralized re-targetting of
all strategic weapons systems.

Possibly as much as one or more unnamed classified
weapons now operational.


10 posted on 12/04/2005 12:32:01 PM PST by Boundless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

Sounds like the good old days of the fifties and the ICBM.


11 posted on 12/04/2005 12:33:42 PM PST by RightWhale (Not transferable -- Good only for this trip)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don Carlos

Yep, sounds like Kim and the Ayatollah aren't getting the message, so we're doing some things to explain it to them. They probably won't get it until their capital cities become glass-bottomed self-lighting parking lot.


12 posted on 12/04/2005 12:35:48 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity ("Sharpei diem - Seize the wrinkled dog.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

You mean our military forces are....[gulp]....capable?!?


13 posted on 12/04/2005 12:38:36 PM PST by StatenIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

What kind of nonsense is this????

Anyone hear of the Trident Submarine fleet being decommissioned?

I have not!


14 posted on 12/04/2005 1:08:04 PM PST by Prost1 (I get my news at Free Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: john drake
"Any details as to how quickly the various types of lightning strikes could be? Say, like 15-30 minutes max to any one location"

If from a sub or destroyer the cruise missile from 50 miles away (off the coast of North Korea) the launch to impact time would be about 6 minutes. You could pour yourself a drink but do not count on time to have a second one. If ICBM launch from the USA you are talking about 30 minutes. If ICBM launch from mid Pacific 15 to 20 minutes. You would have time for that second drink and maybe just maybe if you are fast you could have a third drink, and you will need it because all hell will come down on your butt.

15 posted on 12/04/2005 1:14:17 PM PST by cpdiii (roughneck (oil field trash and proud off it), geologist, pilot, pharmacist, full time iconoclast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Back when I was a SAC crewdog, it was almost impossible to get transferred out of the command. What was worse, if you did get a non-SAC assignment, SAC had first refusal on you next time around. We called it "SAC's world-wide striking power."
16 posted on 12/04/2005 1:14:17 PM PST by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: john drake
"Any details as to how quickly the various types of lightning strikes could be? Say, like 15-30 minutes max to any one location"

If from a sub or destroyer the cruise missile from 50 miles away (off the coast of North Korea) the launch to impact time would be about 6 minutes. You could pour yourself a drink but do not count on time to have a second one. If ICBM launch from the USA you are talking about 30 minutes. If ICBM launch from mid Pacific 15 to 20 minutes. You would have time for that second drink and maybe just maybe if you are fast you could have a third drink, and you will need it because all hell will come down on your butt.

17 posted on 12/04/2005 1:26:35 PM PST by cpdiii (roughneck (oil field trash and proud off it), geologist, pilot, pharmacist, full time iconoclast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ChadGore

An Bru!


18 posted on 12/04/2005 2:06:25 PM PST by Clioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

hmmmm


19 posted on 12/04/2005 2:16:55 PM PST by shield (The Greatest Scientific Discoveries of the Century Reveal God!!!! by Dr. H. Ross, Astrophysicist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

Excellent news. We need to keep our nuclear response razor sharp.


20 posted on 12/04/2005 2:32:18 PM PST by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson