Posted on 12/04/2005 12:02:04 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Edited on 12/04/2005 12:04:13 PM PST by Lead Moderator. [history]
WASHINGTON — The U.S. Strategic Command announced yesterday it had achieved an operational capability for rapidly striking targets around the globe using nuclear or conventional weapons, after last month testing its capacity for nuclear war against a fictional country believed to represent North Korea (see GSN, Oct. 21).
In a press release yesterday, STRATCOM said a new Joint Functional Component Command for Space and Global Strike on Nov. 18 “met requirements necessary to declare an initial operational capability.”
The requirements were met, it said, “following a rigorous test of integrated planning and operational execution capabilities during Exercise Global Lightning.”
The annual Global Lightning exercise last month tested U.S. strategic warfare capabilities, including the so-called CONPLAN 8022 mission for a global strike, according to publicly available military documents.
CONPLAN 8022 is “a new strike plan that includes [a] pre-emptive nuclear strike against weapons of mass destruction facilities anywhere in the world,” said Hans Kristensen, a consultant for the Natural Resources Defense Council. Kristensen first published the STRATCOM press release on his Web site, nukestrat.com.
Military analyst William Arkin, in a column on the Washington Post Web site in October, wrote that the classified exercise involved the response to a radiological “dirty bomb” attack on Alabama by the fictional country Purple or allied terrorists. “In the exercise, Purple is a Northeast Asian nation thinly veiled as North Korea,” according to Arkin.
Maj. Jeff Jones, STRATCOM spokesman, said today that the exercise incorporated various scenarios and added, “Everything is fictional that we put in the exercise.”
Global Lightning employed command and control personnel, according to the STRATCOM release.
Global strike attacks could be launched from U.S. long-range bombers, nuclear submarines or land-based ballistic missiles, according to the STRATCOM Web site.
The new command was created Aug. 9 in an attempt to integrate broad elements of U.S. military power into global strike plans and operations.
That, according to an Arkin commentary in the Washington Post in May, could include anything from electronic jamming to penetrating computer networks, to commando operations, to the use of a nuclear earth penetrator. CONPLAN 8022, he wrote, is intended to address two scenarios using such capabilities: preventing a suspected imminent nuclear attack from a small state, and attacking an adversary’s suspected WMD infrastructure.
STRATCOM Commander Gen. James Cartwright said at an opening ceremony that the new command would help the country convey a “new kind of deterrence.”
According to the STRATCOM release, “The command’s performance during Global Lightning demonstrated preparedness to execute its mission of providing integrated space and global strike capabilities to deter and dissuade aggressors and when directed, defeat adversaries through decisive joint global effects in support of STRATCOM missions.”
According to Arkin’s article in May, CONPLAN 8022 was completed in 2003, “putting in place for the first time a pre-emptive and offensive strike capability against Iran and North Korea.”
STRATCOM’s readiness for global strike was certified to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and President George W. Bush in January 2004, Arkin reported.
....buh bye Iran!!!!
Well, with our ICBM's, SLBMs, and the B-2s and B-1s, this was a foregone conclusion.
But how could this be? The alphabet networks and Donald Trump keep saying that Bush is doing nothing about Korea and Iran. :)
Any details as to how quickly the various types of lightning strikes could be? Say, like 15-30 minutes max to any one location? If I were a middle eastern (or south asian) Islamofascist, I wouldn't be able to sleep at night knowing U.S. submarines lying dormant in the Indian Ocean or South China Sea could launch several dozen nuclear tipped missiles anywhere in my direction, in a matter of minutes. A nightmare scenario, indeed. How pleasant.
So, whats new? We had global strike capabilities 40 years ago! Re-stating the obvious, in case they weren't paying attention, probably.
True, but it never hurts to prod them with a big stick......just to make sure they are awake.
> So, whats new?
Possibly as little as rapid centralized re-targetting of
all strategic weapons systems.
Possibly as much as one or more unnamed classified
weapons now operational.
Sounds like the good old days of the fifties and the ICBM.
Yep, sounds like Kim and the Ayatollah aren't getting the message, so we're doing some things to explain it to them. They probably won't get it until their capital cities become glass-bottomed self-lighting parking lot.
You mean our military forces are....[gulp]....capable?!?
What kind of nonsense is this????
Anyone hear of the Trident Submarine fleet being decommissioned?
I have not!
If from a sub or destroyer the cruise missile from 50 miles away (off the coast of North Korea) the launch to impact time would be about 6 minutes. You could pour yourself a drink but do not count on time to have a second one. If ICBM launch from the USA you are talking about 30 minutes. If ICBM launch from mid Pacific 15 to 20 minutes. You would have time for that second drink and maybe just maybe if you are fast you could have a third drink, and you will need it because all hell will come down on your butt.
If from a sub or destroyer the cruise missile from 50 miles away (off the coast of North Korea) the launch to impact time would be about 6 minutes. You could pour yourself a drink but do not count on time to have a second one. If ICBM launch from the USA you are talking about 30 minutes. If ICBM launch from mid Pacific 15 to 20 minutes. You would have time for that second drink and maybe just maybe if you are fast you could have a third drink, and you will need it because all hell will come down on your butt.
An Bru!
hmmmm
Excellent news. We need to keep our nuclear response razor sharp.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.