Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Israel Preparing for Nuclear-Armed Iran, Sharon Says
CNSNews.com | December 2, 2005 | Julie Stahl

Posted on 12/02/2005 7:27:28 PM PST by Iam1ru1-2

By Julie Stahl CNSNews.com Jerusalem Bureau Chief December 2, 2005

Jerusalem (CNSNews.com) -- Israel will not allow Iran to obtain nuclear weapons but is not leading the international efforts to prevent that from happening, Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon said Thursday.

"Israel and other countries cannot accept a situation where Iran has nuclear arms. The issue is clear to us, and we are making all the necessary preparations to handle a situation of this kind," Sharon told journalists in Tel Aviv.

Nevertheless, Sharon said that Israel is not leading the international campaign against such a development but is "in close contact with countries that are dealing with the issue."

Israel reaped international condemnation when it bombed Iraq's nuclear reactor shortly before it was to be activated in 1981. But a decade later, at the time of the first American-led Gulf war, world leaders admitted their relief that former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein had not obtained nuclear weapons.

The U.S., Israel and other countries suspect that Iran is secretly developing nuclear bombs under cover of its nuclear energy program. But Tehran and Moscow, which is helping Iran complete its first nuclear reactor, both deny the charge and say that the reactor is for civilian purposes only.

Sharon said that every diplomatic effort should be exhausted to pressure Iran into stopping its nuclear weapons program before any military action is taken and that he believed such efforts could still be "fruitful."

Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz said Israel's policy was that the diplomatic track was the way to deal with the Iranian nuclear policy.

But the head of Israel's military intelligence, Maj.-Gen. Aharon Ze'evi Farkash, told lawmakers on Wednesday that if the international community does not succeed in bringing Iran to the United Nations Security Council by the end of March, "diplomatic efforts will be pointless."

Iranian affairs expert Menashe Amir said Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has taken a tougher stance with the international community than his predecessors, believing that the West will back down first.

Nevertheless, Western nations must take a strong stand against Iran's policies, he said.

On Thursday, IRNA -- Iran's state news agency -- quoted Ahmadinejad as defending his country's right to develop nuclear technology. He said that the board of governors of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) had passed a resolution against Iran but backed down when he stood tough.

"We sent the message to Westerners that we would stand firm to the end and that we would never abandon our right, and when they realized [Iran] is firm in its stands, they backed off," Ahmadinejad said.

The IAEA's board of governors decided against sending the issue of Iran's nuclear program to the U.N. Security Council last week -- a move that the U.S. has advocated for some time now.

Copyright © 1998-2005 CNSNews.com - Cybercast News Service


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Israel; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iran; irannukes; missiles
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 12/02/2005 7:27:28 PM PST by Iam1ru1-2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2
Fitting their F-16's with extra fuel tanks.
2 posted on 12/02/2005 7:40:58 PM PST by golfisnr1 (Democrats are like roaches, hard to get rid of.>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

I've not said so on the threads specificly mentioning it, but Russia's willingness to supply missiles to the likes of Iran is a very ominious indicator.

Israel is right to be preparing. The west should get off it's collective ass and prepare as well. They should prepare for action and take Iran's leaderhip out.

This has gone far enough!


3 posted on 12/02/2005 7:43:29 PM PST by DoughtyOne (MSM: Public support for war waining. 403/3 House vote against pullout vaporizes another lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

Oh, this is not good. This is very not good. This is not good on an epic scale.

Somebody needs to get to the bozos in Tehran and explain a few facts of life (or death) to them before millions are incinerated.

This Is Not Good.


4 posted on 12/02/2005 7:45:44 PM PST by filbert (More filbert at http://www.medary.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: filbert
Oh, this is not good. This is very not good. This is not good on an epic scale.

Iran gets taught a much-belated lesson in respect, in the form of a surgical airstrike? Sounds good to me.

5 posted on 12/02/2005 7:51:16 PM PST by Bird Jenkins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

I am sorry in advance but I have to say, "GO ISRAEL" ,,,cause the bible tells me so!


6 posted on 12/02/2005 7:53:04 PM PST by meanie monster (http://sa3bin.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2
Israel reaped international condemnation when it bombed Iraq's nuclear reactor shortly before it was to be activated in 1981. But a decade later, at the time of the first American-led Gulf war, world leaders admitted their relief that former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein had not obtained nuclear weapons.

Yet again, when the UN fails, Israel will prevail.

7 posted on 12/02/2005 7:54:45 PM PST by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

If the west fails to take action and Israel does, it's going to set back the modernization of the Middle-East IMO. Arabs may agree to the U.S. stopping the likes of Hussein, but they are not going to buy off on Israel attacking a Moslem ruled nation like Iran.

Once Israel does this the hatred of the U.S. will grow ten-fold in the region.

What bothers me, is that the west might procrastinate on this issue until it's really screwed the whole thing up.

The case needs to be made, even if we need to bribe Russia into agreement, that Iran's leadership must change.


8 posted on 12/02/2005 7:56:41 PM PST by DoughtyOne (MSM: Public support for war waining. 403/3 House vote against pullout vaporizes another lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

I too share, this isn't good news but it is bound to happen sooner or later. It might be a good time for folks to get right with God..


9 posted on 12/02/2005 7:58:30 PM PST by JamesA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2
Are the politicians and media in your state on
bin laden's payroll?

Nationwide...a near majority if not a majority
of the politicians and media are on bin laden's
payroll.
10 posted on 12/02/2005 8:02:15 PM PST by no-to-illegals
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

There should be no worries. Isreal has nothing to lose, and everything to gain by eliminating the threat. This also takes the pressure off of the US (I assume we already have our bombing raid laid out and ready to execute if it comes to that). We will, of course, be scolded by Russia, France and China for supporting Isreal in it's tactical plan. Hell, we most likely already gave Isreal the hardware required to penetrate the facilities (Which if I remember correctly, are fortified and deep underground).


11 posted on 12/02/2005 8:05:59 PM PST by FunkyZero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2
well maybe I did exaggerate just a little....
then again if these politicians and media aren't
on bin laden's payroll.....
why do these politicians and media act as though
they are on bin laden's payroll?
12 posted on 12/02/2005 8:07:46 PM PST by no-to-illegals
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2
The world may witness the first preemptive nuclear strike, but I doubt Israel will be the initiator.

As per usual the democracies dealing with fascistic dictatorships will have to wait until all is nearly lost before responding.

Millions will die tomorrow due to our inaction today.
13 posted on 12/02/2005 8:09:54 PM PST by mmercier (delivered from the noise of archers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FunkyZero

the option described is better than the "Sampson
Option" being initiated.


14 posted on 12/02/2005 8:10:15 PM PST by no-to-illegals
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: meanie monster

All one has to do is read the Bible books of Daniel and Revelation---don't have to be a Christian,but it helps,to understand just what they have foretold for thousands of years before today---'Gog and Magog'


15 posted on 12/02/2005 8:11:14 PM PST by cmotormac44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Iam1ru1-2

Read Ezekiel 38 & 39. Many have been sounding the alarm that this prophecy is about to occur. Better read it.


16 posted on 12/02/2005 8:13:05 PM PST by BigFinn (A very unpolitically correct MERRY CHRISTMAS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bird Jenkins
Iran gets taught a much-belated lesson in respect, in the form of a surgical airstrike? Sounds good to me.

It would be good if it stopped there. I am not sure that it would. Iran has undoubtedly learned the lesson of Iraq and has decentralized their nuke program. I doubt a single airstrike, or a small number of airstrikes, will put a serious dent in Iran's program.

It's entirely possible we'll see a nuclear exchange between Israel and Iran. This would be very, very bad, regardless of any other consideration.

17 posted on 12/02/2005 8:39:46 PM PST by filbert (More filbert at http://www.medary.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: filbert
It's entirely possible we'll see a nuclear exchange between Israel and Iran. This would be very, very bad, regardless of any other consideration.

And the result will be as many as 35 million dead in under 30 minutes.

18 posted on 12/02/2005 8:55:25 PM PST by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: cmotormac44

thanks for the comment


19 posted on 12/02/2005 8:56:58 PM PST by meanie monster (http://sa3bin.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: filbert

If the jihadists are not put down quickly, they will cause half the world to burn..


20 posted on 12/02/2005 9:28:38 PM PST by sheik yerbouty ( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson