Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Clinton Mum on Pre-war Intel Report
NewsMax ^ | 11/27/05 | NewsMax

Posted on 11/27/2005 11:14:50 AM PST by wagglebee

2008 presidential candidate Hillary Clinton won't say whether she read a key intelligence report on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction before she voted in Oct. 2002 to authorize the Iraq war.

Asked directly by the Boston Herald whether she did her homework by reading the report on the threat posed by Saddam Hussein's WMDs, the paper reports that the Democratic frontrunner "declined to say."

Though billed in the press as a supporter of the war, the former first lady has been highly critical of the Bush administration's so-called rush to judgment of Iraq's pre-war threat.

But in Oct. 2002, while explaining why she intended to vote for the war, Clinton clearly left the impression that she had read all the intel on Saddam's WMDs that she could get her hands on.

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile-delivery capability and his nuclear program," she told the Senate before voting to authorize the war.

Asked last month whether she regretted her vote, Mrs. Clinton told NPR: "You know, I really can't talk about this on the fly. It's too important."


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2002; hillary; hillaryclinton; iraq; iraqresolution; npr; prewarintelligence; wmds
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last
Of course Hitlery voted for it, she was the unelected co-felon-in-chief for eight years, she probably knew more about Saddam's weapons program than the Bent One.
1 posted on 11/27/2005 11:14:51 AM PST by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Her Royal Highness declined to say, and a palace spokesman stated that the Queen considers this matter closed.


2 posted on 11/27/2005 11:18:00 AM PST by Steely Tom (Fortunately, the Bill of Rights doesn't include the word 'is'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Notice how the beast always ducks questions that are off subject from her reasons to be talking to the press?

Debates could be a wooden stake.

3 posted on 11/27/2005 11:19:11 AM PST by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I thought Hilary's Mum was dead.


4 posted on 11/27/2005 11:20:15 AM PST by Restorer (They want to die. We want to kill them. Cool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

But according to Biden and Kerry, they really didn't vote on going to war. Just voted on talking about maybe going to war sometime, possibly, or maybe not.


5 posted on 11/27/2005 11:20:36 AM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
She had access to the information while she was co-President. Who cares if she read it as a senator. It was Billy Bob's boy, Tenet, who gave them the info. Not a Republican appointee.

It was the Clinton intelligence apparatus, pared down as it was, that failed to get any info after Soddom kicked out the UN in 1998.
6 posted on 11/27/2005 11:20:37 AM PST by LA Conservative (Read The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam by Robert Spencer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

She seems to be the "Queen of No Comment" to me. A serious debate with a good opponent would be SO MUCH FUN to watch!


7 posted on 11/27/2005 11:22:08 AM PST by topazbeth ("There is no safety for honest men except by believing all possible evil of evil men." –Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee
Debates could be a wooden stake.

H*****y's performance against Rick Lazio was very poor. Just about anyone could clean her clock in a debate.

8 posted on 11/27/2005 11:22:57 AM PST by Fresh Wind (Democrats are guilty of whatever they scream the loudest about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

If she doesn't know what-all about Iraq by now, she's clearly unqualified to go back to the WH to deal with it. Not that her evil followers care.


9 posted on 11/27/2005 11:23:28 AM PST by AmericanChef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Note to self... restate question as: Did you read the reports in Sandy's pants, elsewhere or both oh cloven hooved, forked tongued one?


10 posted on 11/27/2005 11:25:06 AM PST by AliVeritas (''I'd rather have Jihadis in front of me than Democrats behind me.'' Go GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

"I don't recall."


11 posted on 11/27/2005 11:25:24 AM PST by manwiththehands (Democrats: lies and hypocrisy on steroids)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: manwiththehands

Would that be like the 12,979th time she used that response... as we know of?


12 posted on 11/27/2005 11:26:27 AM PST by AliVeritas (''I'd rather have Jihadis in front of me than Democrats behind me.'' Go GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; Mia T; doug from upland
Hillary Clinton Mum

"Hillary Clinton Mum" ----- Damn........... that's the quietest Chappaqua Rose has been since she slept with Bill at the Reagan funeral.

13 posted on 11/27/2005 11:26:46 AM PST by beyond the sea (Murtha: Redeployment - What .......Surrender? // “Victory is not a strategy”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

14 posted on 11/27/2005 11:27:41 AM PST by Goldwater-Reagan Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topazbeth

With Condi!


15 posted on 11/27/2005 11:27:58 AM PST by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I'm afraid we're going to be getting "triangulation strangulation" until Nov. '06

16 posted on 11/27/2005 11:29:02 AM PST by WalterSkinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AliVeritas

Nooooo, it's the 19.159th.


17 posted on 11/27/2005 11:29:11 AM PST by Goldwater-Reagan Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Asked last month whether she regretted her vote, Mrs. Clinton told NPR: "You know, I really can't talk about this on the fly. It's too important."

A foreshadowing of the MONSTEROUS PROBLEM Hitlery, aka The World's Smartest Women", will have when running in 08. She is in reality dumb as an ox when having to think for herself and on her feet. She's a complete phony and does not know what the 'correct' answer-du-jour is, unless she consults with her advisers or spends much time thinking through the various answers.

18 posted on 11/27/2005 11:29:25 AM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

"Hillary's choice was not to know what she knew." -- Hillary's Choice by Gail Sheehy


19 posted on 11/27/2005 11:30:14 AM PST by beyond the sea (Murtha: Redeployment - What .......Surrender? // “Victory is not a strategy”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
the BEAST in her Boating Crusty...
Image hosted by Photobucket.com
20 posted on 11/27/2005 11:35:31 AM PST by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson