Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I have cointacted bill sponsor STATE REPRESENTATIVE TIMOTHY J. TOOMEY, JR. I await his reply.

Room 166 District Office

State House 550 Cambridge St

Boston, MA 02133 Cambridge, MA 02141

Telephone: (617) 722-2692 617-491-1846

Affiliation: Democrat

1 posted on 11/26/2005 12:43:10 PM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last
To: pabianice
Affiliation: Democrat

I'm shocked!

2 posted on 11/26/2005 12:45:49 PM PST by neodad (My ex-wife is stuck on stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

What a load of crap! What part of "shall not be infringed" do they not understand. The frog boils slowly.


3 posted on 11/26/2005 12:51:56 PM PST by beltfed308 (Cloth or link. Happiness is a perfect trunnion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

guess he put the "ass" back in Mass. ,too.


4 posted on 11/26/2005 12:51:57 PM PST by Rakkasan1 (Peace de Resistance! Viva la Paper towels!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

Isn't this the same type of governmental intrusion that led to some problems in Massachusetts in 1775?


5 posted on 11/26/2005 12:52:27 PM PST by 04-Bravo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

This sounds like a perfect 2nd Amendment test case if it goes through and SCOTUS has the stones to review it.


8 posted on 11/26/2005 12:54:30 PM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

A rally at Concord would be most fitting.


9 posted on 11/26/2005 12:54:32 PM PST by beltfed308 (Cloth or link. Happiness is a perfect trunnion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

It's hard to believe how stupid Democrats are. Time and again they get royally thumped at the polls when they push gun control.

Therefore, my response to Mr. Toomey is to say more power to ya!


11 posted on 11/26/2005 12:56:13 PM PST by rottndog (WOOF!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice
I wonder how many in LEO would have no problem enforcing such a law?

I suppose many would not risk their pension.

12 posted on 11/26/2005 12:56:30 PM PST by Mark was here (How can they be called "Homeless" if their home is a field?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

Geez, just move out of that 'rathole state and come to Texas.

< / total disgust >


13 posted on 11/26/2005 12:57:23 PM PST by ChefKeith ( If Diplomacy worked, then we would be sitting here talking...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice
There IS a constitutional solution for governmental tyranny.
Somewhere between the 1st and 3rd ammendment, as I recall.
14 posted on 11/26/2005 12:57:55 PM PST by FreedomFarmer (This season, slap the Holiday Jeer out of every lib you meet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice
Most disgustingly, this bill is being crammed through the Legislature under Homeland Security measures.

Why disgusting? What did you think 'homeland security' was about, if not government power?

16 posted on 11/26/2005 12:59:33 PM PST by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

I don't see the customary exemption for police and military written in this bill.


19 posted on 11/26/2005 1:01:47 PM PST by beltfed308 (Cloth or link. Happiness is a perfect trunnion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

The fact is we have a dictatorial legislature. They have carved the districts so much that a Democrat super-majority is gaurenteed, and have stripped the Governor of of many of his powers since the office became Republican 16 years ago. We are almost at the point at which we should scrap the state constitution and start over again in my opinion. MASSACHUSETTS NEEDS TO BE LIBERATED!


25 posted on 11/26/2005 1:11:34 PM PST by MassachusettsGOP (Massachusetts Republican....A rare breed indeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

Irrelevant.

It'll be struck down by the SC faster then Bill Clinton can get his pants off at a sorrority party.


26 posted on 11/26/2005 1:12:33 PM PST by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice
Provision of the Massachusetts Consitution:

"The people have a right to keep and bear arms for the common defense. And as, in time of peace, armies are dangerous to liberty, they ought not to be maintained without the consent of the legislature, and the military power shall always be held in an exact subordination to the civil authority, and be governed by it." Declaration of Rights, Article 17."

http://www.nraila.org/GunLaws/StateLaws.aspx?ST=MA

27 posted on 11/26/2005 1:15:32 PM PST by groanup (shred for Ian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

But criminals will be exempted from buying insurance.


31 posted on 11/26/2005 1:17:45 PM PST by pleikumud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice; 04-Bravo; beltfed308
BOSTON - April 20

National guard units seeking to confiscate a cache of recently banned weapons were ambushed on April 19th by elements of a para-military extremist faction. Military and law enforcement sources estimate that 72 were killed and more than 200 injured before government forces were compelled to withdraw.

Speaking after the clash Massachusetts Governor Thomas Gage declared that the extremist faction, which was made up of local citizens, has links to the radical right-wing tax protest movement. Gage blamed the extremists for recent incidents of vandalism directed against internal revenue offices. The governor, who described the group's organizers as "criminals," issued an executive order authorizing the summary arrest of any individual who has interfered with the government's efforts to secure law and order.

The military raid on the extremist arsenal followed wide-spread refusal by the local citizenry to turn over recently outlawed weapons. Gage issued a ban on private ownership of weapons and ammunition earlier in the week. This decision followed a meeting in early this month between government and military leaders at which the governor authorized the forcible confiscation of illegal arms. One government official, speaking on condition of anonymity, pointed out that "none of these people would have been killed had the extremists obeyed the law and turned over their weapons voluntarily."

Government troops initially succeeded in confiscating a large supply of outlawed weapons and ammunition. However, troops attempting to seize arms and ammunition in Lexington met with resistance from heavily-armed extremists who had been tipped off regarding the government's plans.

During a tense standoff in Lexington's town park, National Guard Colonel Francis Smith, commander of the government operation, ordered the armed group to surrender and return to their homes. The impasse was broken by a single shot, which was reportedly fired by one of the right-wing extremists. Eight civilians were killed in the ensuing exchange. Ironically, the local citizenry blamed government forces rather than the extremists for the civilian deaths.

Before order could be restored, armed citizens from the surrounding areas had descended upon the guard units. Colonel Smith, finding his forces overmatched by the armed mob, ordered a retreat.

Governor Gage has called upon citizens to support the state national joint task force in its effort to restore law and order. The governor has also demanded the surrender of those responsible for planning and leading the attack against the government troops. Samuel Adams, Paul Revere, and John Hancock, who have been identified as "ringleaders" of the extremist faction, remain at large.

First reported on April 20, 1775

34 posted on 11/26/2005 1:23:16 PM PST by Monitor (Gun control isn't about guns; it's about control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice
In cases where a finding of fact and guilt is to be made, one member of any such committee must be a member of Stop Handgun Violence, Inc.

Eh?
36 posted on 11/26/2005 1:23:51 PM PST by Pox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice
In cases where a finding of fact and guilt is to be made, one member of any such committee must be a member of Stop Handgun Violence, Inc.

I'm sure this will be balanced with one NRA member as well, of course.

/ sarcasm / bitterness / anger / rage / fury / hatred of socialist policy

38 posted on 11/26/2005 1:25:39 PM PST by Hardastarboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice
In cases where a finding of fact and guilt is to be made,

one member of any such committee must be a member of Stop Handgun Violence, Inc.


!!!!!
39 posted on 11/26/2005 1:26:14 PM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson