Same problem, different country, different thinking. What follows is an incomplete, yet very believable catch phrase regarding (illegal) immigration.
Who suffered from ...importation of cheap labour? The poor and the low paid, that’s who.
Who benefited? The rich benefited because they had cheaper labour in the restaurants they frequented and cheaper cleaners to scrub the loo-seats...
1 posted on
11/25/2005 1:35:40 AM PST by
XHogPilot
To: XHogPilot
"Liberal interventionists lie down with neoconservatives, hardline Marxists make awkward love to religious fundamentalists, the Tory best hope is a Blairite and Ariel Sharon founds his own centre party." ...and booty for all!
2 posted on
11/25/2005 2:33:50 AM PST by
Gordongekko909
(I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
To: XHogPilot
3 posted on
11/25/2005 4:49:29 AM PST by
jmaroneps37
(We will never murtha to the terrorists. Bring home the troops means bring home the war.)
To: XHogPilot
Who benefits from USA's illegal immigrant cheap labor pool?
Corporations making higher profits.
Who suffers from illegal immigrant cheap labor?
The American citizen shouldering their cost to provide their FREE medical care, education of their families, and often incarceration in our prisons.
The American victim who has been attacked or had his property destroyed by illegal alien criminals.
4 posted on
11/25/2005 5:46:59 AM PST by
OrangeBlossomSpecial
(The RATS followed the lazy tune of the pied-piper's flute and were never seen again.)
To: XHogPilot
5 posted on
11/25/2005 6:47:40 AM PST by
RippleFire
("It's a joke, son!")
To: XHogPilot
This is an issue where, like crime, the left must choose between the socioeconomic interests of their blue collar base and the left bobo politically correct types.
6 posted on
11/25/2005 9:10:26 AM PST by
Sam the Sham
(A conservative party tough on illegal immigration could carry California in 2008)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson