Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Turning Around Mainline Protestanism
Christianity Today ^ | July 25, 2003 | Michael Hamilton and Jennifer McKinney

Posted on 11/24/2005 7:22:28 AM PST by Zack Nguyen

Elaine Pagels, the famous historian of early Christianity, once told a revealing story about the social world behind the scenes of high-powered biblical scholarship. As a young up-and-coming professor at the annual meeting of the Society of Biblical Literature, she was invited to a closed-door, after-hours smoker.

The men there (Pagels was the only woman) were all prominent Bible scholars. Many of them didn't even believe in God, and those who still called themselves Christian were anything but orthodox. The liquor flowed freely, and as these men got in their cups, they began to sing old gospel songs. To her astonishment, they knew all the tunes and words by heart. Then it dawned on her—these atheist and liberal Bible scholars must have grown up in evangelical churches.

Had Pagels herself grown up in evangelicalism she might not have been so surprised. Evangelicals have long known that it is easy for individuals and institutions—especially professors and universities—to slide down the slippery slope from orthodoxy to infidelity. Once down the slope, there's usually no climbing back up. It's a one-way street from evangelicalism to liberalism, a street that many individuals and colleges, and all the mainline Protestant denominations, have gone down.

(Excerpt) Read more at christianitytoday.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: biblebelieving; evangelicals; liberals; protestants; religiousleft
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
For your comment. I am fascinated by the shift in Christendom. Today the dividing line is less denominational than it is confessional. To me this is a welcome development, because if we are going to have debates, it should be over the Bible.

I confess that I am somewhat skeptical that many of these denominations can be turned around. The SBC did it, but they were very bottom-up instead of top-down.

1 posted on 11/24/2005 7:22:29 AM PST by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen

Revival, Education, Apostacy

That's the pattern and it's been being repeated ever since the first century.

At first people are on fire for The Lord; then they build schools and colleges, then the professors decide they know more than God.


2 posted on 11/24/2005 7:26:07 AM PST by RoadTest (I am come - - that they which see not might see; and that they which see might be made blind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen
One more thing to add: liberals do not take over a denomination and drive it to greater heights of evangelism, works of good service and discipleship. They take over a denomination, fracture its witness, drive away members, and run it into the ground.

Some Bible-believing Christians shy away from this kind of conflict, allowing liberals to take over their churches and denominations because they think conflict with others is "worldly." I could not disagree more. Christ and the Apostles did not shy away from disagreement. R.C. Sproul stated in his book Essential Truths of the Christian Faith that "Jesus' life was a storm of controversy." Christ was (and is) never vindicative or petty, but he did not hesitate to speak the truth.

I believe many Christians forget these lessons.

3 posted on 11/24/2005 7:28:55 AM PST by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: miele man

You might appreciate this article, given your witness within the Episcopal Church.

Miele Man has an interesting testimoney of being in a position to watch the decline and fall of Episcopalianism. (Did I spell that right?)


4 posted on 11/24/2005 7:31:13 AM PST by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RoadTest

While their is historical evidence to back up your claim, I don't think it has to be that way. If caught early enough, the rot can be arrested before in infects the entire tree. The SBC did it.


5 posted on 11/24/2005 7:32:03 AM PST by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen

their=there. Whoops!


6 posted on 11/24/2005 7:32:25 AM PST by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen

IMO these christian liberals confuse themselves with God. They remind me of Sir Robin at the bridge in Monty Python and the Holy Grail. They see evil in the world that needs fixing and say "That's Easy!" Then off they go over the cliff not realizing that it is their all too human conceit that is their undoing.


7 posted on 11/24/2005 7:34:53 AM PST by trek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: trek

That's a great point. (I love that movie!) Yes, I believe that the root of liberalism is a God complex. "I can rid the earth of poverty." "I can make the world equal." "I can use government to advance society."


8 posted on 11/24/2005 7:37:07 AM PST by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen

Interesting post..thanks..FYI..Paghels, who is mentioned in the opening paragraph, is an interestng scholar. I've attended one lecture of hers, and hone of her books, "The Origin of Satan" is worth the read..


9 posted on 11/24/2005 7:40:49 AM PST by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to pass on her gene pool....any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen

"You shall be as gods." "I will be like the Most High."

Remember who was behind those thoughts?


10 posted on 11/24/2005 7:42:58 AM PST by Cecily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen

A little bit of good news. Thanks


11 posted on 11/24/2005 7:44:55 AM PST by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen
"I can rid the earth of poverty." "I can make the world equal." "I can use government to advance society."

Yep. They don't want to pray to Jesus, they want to be Jesus.

12 posted on 11/24/2005 7:46:59 AM PST by trek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

".Paghels, who is mentioned in the opening paragraph, is an interestng scholar."

Elaine Pagels is the worst sort of Gnostic heretic!!!!!!!! I'd call her "post modern", but she's just a plain old fashioned Gnostic.


13 posted on 11/24/2005 7:55:06 AM PST by Kolokotronis (Christ is Risen, and you, o death, are annihilated!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen

"The second problem, one that runs deep in the evangelical psyche, is that many evangelicals find church politics utterly distasteful."

I find this to be true. It's similar to the situation in politics. By their very nature, conservatives find government distasteful. Yet, neither group (evangelicals or conservatives) can win without infiltrating the upper levels of the very organizations they dislike. Victory is possible in time. That's great news!


14 posted on 11/24/2005 7:57:01 AM PST by CitizenUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen

Matthew 5:13

13 "You are the salt of the earth; but if salt has lost its taste, how can its saltiness be restored? It is no longer good for anything, but is thrown out and trampled under foot."

Can Churches lose their saltiness? Yes. How? Through worldliness. They must repent and believe on this Lord Jesus Christ, the one who took our sin upon himself and paid the penalty in our behalf. Is it possible? Yes. With God all things are possible. All things are possible to them that believes. SBC did it, so can others.


15 posted on 11/24/2005 7:58:35 AM PST by FreeRep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alice au Wonderland

ping to twink et alia


16 posted on 11/24/2005 8:03:16 AM PST by Alice au Wonderland (Viper-Tongued Sister of the King, Mother Superior, Purveyor of Prurience, Caustic Court Castigator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen

Elaine Pagels has made a very successful career of lying about the true nature of Christianity and Gnosticism. In her revisionist history, St. Augustine and the Christians are the oppressive villains, and the Gnostics are the marvellous, liberating heroes.

More recently, she has suggested that the four canonical gospels are unreliable, so you need to go out and buy the Gnostic and heretical Gospel of Thomas to find out what really happened.

She has been lavishly awarded with honors and advancement because the Ivy League colleges and the academic establishment don't care about historical truth; they care about subversion, and she has been extremely helpful in subverting.


17 posted on 11/24/2005 8:04:35 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen

I long ago abandoned attending church service because the pastors stood in the pulpit week after week delivering sermons that condemned the congregation for having been born because we were all sinners. I don't believe that's what God intended and I think he intended His Word to be more uplifting and positive than the pastors were delivering.

Since abandoning church services, I discovered that God has an 800 number than I can (and do) use whenever I need/want to talk with Him.

IMO, the biggest problem with church liberalism is that people want to be able to sin and not be held accountable. They want to have their cake and eat it, too. But, the message of religion is that actions have consequences and one shouldn't expect to hear that they are wonderful human beings and there are no consequences for them after a night of drinking, beating and murdering their spouse.

And, that's what too many people want.


18 posted on 11/24/2005 8:05:39 AM PST by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen
The men there (Pagels was the only woman) were all prominent Bible scholars.
Many of them didn't even believe in God, and those who still called
themselves Christian were anything but orthodox.


Reminds me of the story that R.C. Sproul recounted about standing in line with
fellow seminarians awaiting their final examination by the faculty.
Suddenly, one of his nervous fellow student asks Sproul:
"...uh, The Resurrection?..."
Sproul was confused and asked his friend "What do you mean?"
Frantically seeking to clarify his question and to get Sproul's guidance
to the appropriate answer that would satisfy the faculty members,
he said "...umm, The Resurrection...uh, do I believe in it or not?"

That little interchange told me always am cautious about sizing up
any graduate of a seminary/theology school as to where they are REALLY
coming from when they discuss the ultimate issues of life and death.
19 posted on 11/24/2005 8:06:02 AM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen
Agree. Jesus said He would only return when we came into a "unity of the faith," and to me that means the end of denominations. I think with the incredible surge in non-denominational (but, as you aptly put it, "confessional") churches, we are starting to move in that direction.

I teach at a "Catholic" university, and often joke that (as a Protestant) I'm "more Catholic" than 90% of the people who teach in the Religious Studies department.

20 posted on 11/24/2005 8:09:46 AM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson