Posted on 11/23/2005 3:10:05 PM PST by Pharmboy
I don't like the Bow it looks like it would plow and dig in to the waves
Currently they are planning on a two gun mounts using
155mm LRRAP(long range rocket assisted projectile).
Range is expected to be 100NM for the first generation land attack round.
http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNUS_61-62_ags.htm
ships floating to the bottom
wtf?
No. 155s.
" The vessel's two 155mm guns will be able to fire up to 100 nautical miles at a sustained rate of 12 rounds per minute. "
http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/dd21/
The Navy hopes to drive down the price of future ships to $2.2 billion.
I don't think they'd have any trouble getting them quite a
bit below that if they ordered a thousand of them...
Musta been some southron boys designed that.
The navy used to have a pair of them.
Wow! I never heard about those.
Leave it to the Japanese.
You are forgetting about Naval Gunfire Support for land forces.
After all something has to replace the Battleships.
Heck, we did that already - a long time ago! Here she was in all her glory, preparing to recover 2 of her aircraft:
More info here.
And for all you Freudian Freepers, the image of hangaring an airship like the Macon beats the stuffing out of the tired 'train into tunnel' imagery - at least for me ...
Ping!
Steely-eyed Killers of the Deep PING
Across the Pacific?
I'm thinking more of this happening in the South China Sea, the Straits for Formosa, or the Sea of Japan.
They have cut the rate of fire to 10 rds/min.
However with the wide variety of projectiles available
the kill capability has greatly increased.
They likely have already stollen the design or paid the Democratic party for it.
That thing is going to look pretty snazzy on Periviz.
The Navy certainly needs next generation firepower but I think the DDX is $20B of "winning the last war technology." The next war between two technical nations will be won by the side that masters the battlespace with thousands of unmanned drone weapons, both sea and airborne. If I were taking bets on this Death Star from Pascagoula vs 300 inbound stealthy drones, I'd bet on the drones.
If you take China for the next contender (another good bet) there are a lot of things pointing towards this type of warfare. The US and Israel have proven drone technology in battle, including low cost ultra-small drones. It has been our method to use them in individually and in small numbers, but think of the evolution of air warfare from the solo dogfights of 1914 to the 1000 planes bomber masses of 1944. The war in Iraq has shown the continued vulnerability of conventional weapons and tactics to asymmetrical attack. China has massive manufacturing capability with increasingly high technology. Should they put their mind to it they would have no problem producing drowns in the hundreds of thousands. Anyone familiar with Chinese infantry tactics knows that despite modern reforms they still love the human wave approach. It won't take much genius to convert the old tendency sending 5000 infantrymen charging up a hill to sending 5000 drones toward an American carrier battle group. The Soviet Union trained to make an attack on a US carrier battle group and hopefully overwhelm its defense with dozens or hundreds of anti-ship missiles. Luckily we never had to see how that would have worked. In the period since then close in weapons and ship defenses have been greatly improved, but next generation drones will be very small, very maneuverable and hard to hit. We train and design weapons to stop a mass inbound attack but I fear that number of bogies we are capable of stopping may be off by factor of 10 from what can be launched at us. It is not just the Navy who needs to make this paradigm shift. Air Force bases, masses of ground troops and even individual aircraft in flight or armored vehicles may become the targets of these swarms.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.