Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: proxy_user

No, but it is in GM's interest.

There's a huge potential market for a new, lost-cost high-quality domestic manufacturer. The massive pension, health, etc. libailities of Ford and GM have created a huge opening in the market.

There's nothing really wrong with GM's cars. They're just not quite up to snuff. I have a 2003 Saturn SL-1, but I only bought it because a relative offered me a good deal on it when he bought a Civic Hybrid.

Neither Ford nor GM produces any cars that I can really imagine anyone buying simply because they want one. My SL-1 is an ok car, but I can think of nothing to recommend it over any other car.

Chrysler has the right idea. They're producing cars which people actually covet which are fairly reasonably priced - the PT Crusier, the 300C, the Crossfire, and the new Dodge Charger being the most obvious examples.

What do Ford and GM have in their present-year models which is economically priced?


11 posted on 11/20/2005 3:15:46 PM PST by furquhart (Gingrich '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: furquhart

I'd add their Jeep line to Chryslers list. The Wrangler and Liberty are great vehicles for what they were designed to do. The Liberty is a little heavy on the gas though.


72 posted on 11/21/2005 2:58:20 AM PST by Meldrim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson