To: txgirl4Bush
Murtha's military service is cited so often and his defenders are so shrill that it evidently escapes everybody's attention that the discussion was really about which Democratic politician was best qualified to advocate surrender.As I noted in a previous post, Murtha became so accustomed to losing in Viet Nam, that he wants to put it all of our fighting forces now! Is it revenge? Is it cowardice? Or, is it both? He is the center of the "Surrender Now" democrats! I have no use for this man, regardless of his military service! He is a coward through and through!
4 posted on
11/19/2005 4:54:56 PM PST by
Road Warrior ‘04
(Kill 'em til they're dead! Then, kill 'em again!)
To: Bushbacker1
Is it revenge? Is it cowardice? Perhaps it's envy.
7 posted on
11/19/2005 5:03:30 PM PST by
hobson
To: Bushbacker1
To Demoncraps like Murtha, all present and future conflicts involving the United States will be another version of Viet Nam.
11 posted on
11/19/2005 5:22:32 PM PST by
luvbach1
(Near the belly of the beast in San Diego)
To: Bushbacker1
He is the center of the "Surrender Now" democrats! I have no use for this man, regardless of his military service! He is a coward through and through!<<<
My Country...Right or Wrong!......Naaah...lets just have a Democratic UTOPIA where each individual decides if he wants to fight....The Constitution is out dated...
16 posted on
11/19/2005 5:47:47 PM PST by
M-cubed
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson