To: LS
If the hysterical shrieking on this board is any indication, Dawinism is weaker than even I thought.
Okay, so creationists evaluate the theory of evolution with the Bible, with whether or not they like the implications, with whether or not people they don't like allegedly accept it, with how it contradicts a misunderstanding of other scientific principles (such as thermodynamics) and now with their perception of "shrieking" by those who accept it.
Why don't creationists ever evaluate the theory of evolution based upon the 150+ years of research that has gone into supporting it?
73 posted on
11/12/2005 9:07:13 AM PST by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Dimensio
Exactly what I have done. And I have found incredible disconnects in every avenue taken by the Darwinists. But, again, any "scientific" position that was at all well-grounded would have no problem emerging victorious over a simple "religious" theory, would it? So why the fear of a little "competition?" Could it be the "scientific" grounds upon which this house of sand is constructed can't tolerate even the slightest scientific criticism?
168 posted on
11/12/2005 2:05:52 PM PST by
LS
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson