Skip to comments.
[Kansas Gov. Kathleen] Sebelius criticizes State Board of Education's move [new science standards]
Kansas City Star via Kansas.com ^
| 12 November 2005
| DAVID KLEPPER
Posted on 11/12/2005 4:16:49 AM PST by PatrickHenry
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340, 341-360, 361-380, 381-389 next last
To: PatrickHenry
You do not add any discourse to the debate. All you add is the perception that darwinists are arrogant jerks, who kneejerkingly dismiss those that the world and universe were created by a higher power.
Now back to the original debate, what is so evil of stating in schools that evolution is a theory and that others believe that there is a higher power who created the universe, and why your almost fetish like need to dismiss such people.
341
posted on
11/13/2005 5:32:17 AM PST
by
Dane
( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
To: WildTurkey
If recycling the truth works, terrific. Darwinists have recycled crap for 90 years.
342
posted on
11/13/2005 5:34:38 AM PST
by
LS
To: WildTurkey
Your every post indicates how much you fear genuine scientific inquiry.
343
posted on
11/13/2005 5:35:26 AM PST
by
LS
To: WildTurkey
Heheh. You reached your peak before you even began posting. Give it up.
344
posted on
11/13/2005 5:36:49 AM PST
by
LS
To: RightWingNilla
"Hold on a sec here.
Are you saying the designer purposely engineered a broken gene in humans and apes?"
Interesting question, as when I said commonality of species does not demonstrate descent, only their similarity of design, I was careful not to assign a negative to the similarity.
However, it appears that you consider unable to produce ascorbic acid a "broken gene" or a negative.
The negative would be if there were no method or means to supply the required ascorbic acid for the healthy function of the body.
The chimps and great apes have no clue they cannot produce ascorbic acid, yet the human mind has the ability to determine this inability. I would say to you that difference between the chimps & great apes versus their suppose relatives out weights any similarities their physical flesh have in common.
To: VadeRetro
"No surprise, of course. After six years, I already knew it's certainly not about the evidence."
So very true, when play acting supposed conservative bow the knee to the liberal methodology of staying in business does give evidence to the veracity of the theory. Full of holes.
I mean come now if there ever was a doubt to what is at core of darwinism promoting "fast" Eddie Rendell and K. Sebelius as saviours for an ideology, heap of evidence. Could not have planned it better myself.
To: PatrickHenry
To: TheForceOfOne; Dimensio
No, evolution is a natural progression but without knowing how it started it is useless. No, not at all. When describing the dynamics of a system it's absolutely irrelevant how that system originated. What's important is only that it exists.
I hope you do realize that an imperfect self-replicator is still an imperfect self-replicator no matter how it originated.
According to your criteria most scientific theories are useless but one reason for the rapid advancement of modern science was its willingness to separate the dynamics of a system from its initial conditions.
348
posted on
11/13/2005 6:20:34 AM PST
by
BMCDA
(Whereof we cannot speak, thereof we must be silent. -- L. Wittgenstein)
To: TheForceOfOne
"No, evolution is a natural progression but without knowing how it started it is useless."Does a good carpenter or cabinet maker need to know how an acorn becomes and oak?
349
posted on
11/13/2005 6:24:45 AM PST
by
muir_redwoods
(Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopechne is walking around free)
To: Dane; PatrickHenry
You do not add any discourse to the debate. All you add is the perception that darwinists (IOW, Darwin worship, TK:C3R6) are arrogant jerks (TK:C1R7), who kneejerkingly dismiss those that the world and universe were created by a higher power (IOW, Christian-bashing; TK:C2R5).
Now back to the original debate, what is so evil of stating in schools that evolution is a theory and that others believe that there is a higher power who created the universe (IOW, what are you afraid of?; TK:C4R3), and why your almost fetish like need to dismiss such people (IOW, again, Christian-bashing; TK:C2R5)
Wow, the Troll Kit really works. This is going to come in handy.
350
posted on
11/13/2005 6:29:45 AM PST
by
ml1954
(NOT the disruptive troll seen frequently on CREVO threads)
To: Dimensio; Dane
Beware: doctors only want to indoctrinate you into an anti-religious communistic mindset!
Another shameless distortion.
Here is the complete paragraph in context, no doctors mentioned, but marxist atheism sure is. And they want to stop the growth of religion and spirituality among the Chinese, and replace that with "the norms and dogmas of scientific thought.
The paper stresses the importance of good health and healthy bodies which must be promoted by helping people acquire the habit of good behaviour, and scientifically and reasonably conduct of physical exercises, health care, living, sightseeing, recreation and entertainment. Health care, sports and leisure must find inspiration in Marxist atheism and follow the practical directives of party members.
Wolf
351
posted on
11/13/2005 6:33:33 AM PST
by
RunningWolf
(tag line limbo)
To: PatrickHenry
If I put up the Evo troll toolkit I would get banned.
352
posted on
11/13/2005 6:35:52 AM PST
by
RunningWolf
(tag line limbo)
To: Dane; PatrickHenry
You do not add any discourse to the debate. It's worse than that. He doesn't add any debate to the discourse, either.
353
posted on
11/13/2005 6:42:07 AM PST
by
VadeRetro
(Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
To: ml1954; PatrickHenry
Go ahead and knock yourself out, living by your tusty old troll kit.
You just perpetuate who the real trolls are.
354
posted on
11/13/2005 6:59:48 AM PST
by
Dane
( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
To: jennyp
355
posted on
11/13/2005 8:18:51 AM PST
by
furball4paws
(One of the last Evil Geniuses, or the first of their return.)
To: Dimensio
All I ask is that people should keep an open mind about the origins of life and not exclude possible reasons.
Evolutionists denounce divine intervention and vice versa leaving each with a narrow acceptance of probability.
We do not know how life was created and we can only assume how it will continue based on observance of what we consider reality.
Who can say with absolute certainty and proof that the universe will not collapse upon itself tomorrow leaving one giant black hole void of any life at all.
We spend way too much time in our own personal lives and the entire human race caught up in politics, wars, etc. and not nearly enough time understanding life and death. I believe death is the result of our ignorance of science, it is unnecessary.
I believe religion keeps the world from total anarchy because with a reason to believe their is a difference between good and bad behavior we have a standard to follow. Without religion governments would become God leaving us in a police state with politicians playing the role of apostles.
We are a fragile and self destructive life form that believes we are the highest form of life short of God himself. All scientific conclusions should come with an asterisk.
To: PatrickHenry
Expect no response if you're a troll, lunatic, retard, or incurable ignoramus
Is this why most of your posts are to no one?
357
posted on
11/13/2005 8:20:31 AM PST
by
furball4paws
(One of the last Evil Geniuses, or the first of their return.)
To: TheForceOfOne
Still waiting for someone to tell me how something can be created from nothing. Still waiting for someone to tell me how something that can create something from nothing was created.
358
posted on
11/13/2005 8:27:55 AM PST
by
donh
To: Just mythoughts
The chimps and great apes have no clue they cannot produce ascorbic acid, yet the human mind has the ability to determine this inability. Human minds didn't determine this inability until after one post Darwin biological scientist determined and published it. To come in later and suggest that all humans have the ability to determine the fact is no different than saying that the human mind (and most chimps and great apes for that matter) have the ability to flip a light switch AFTER one scientist finally invents the light bulb.
359
posted on
11/13/2005 8:36:14 AM PST
by
shuckmaster
(Bring back SeaLion and ModernMan!)
To: donh
An even better stated question, thank you.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340, 341-360, 361-380, 381-389 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson