Replies

The problem is that those on the Darwinism side of the debate refuse to see or studiously ignore the fact that the natural sciences do not contain all possible knowledge.

Science has never claimed to be the oracle of all possible knowledge. To make such a statement underscores your own ignorance of scientists. Do you actually know, in person or on line, any scientists? Any scientist who claimed science was such an oracle, would never pass his or her dissertaion exam.

30 posted on 11/10/2005 5:31:26 AM PST by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)

"Science has never claimed to be the oracle of all possible knowledge. To make such a statement underscores your own ignorance of scientists. Do you actually know, in person or on line, any scientists? Any scientist who claimed science was such an oracle, would never pass his or her dissertaion exam."

You are exactly correct "SCIENCE" does not claim such but flesh man sure does, else they would not make the claim that the Creator did not create fully grown adult beings, more than two. That rejection is an oracle of lack of knowledge.