Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prosecutors argue they should TALK to Limbaugh's doctors
AP ^ | Tue, Nov. 08, 2005 | AP

Posted on 11/08/2005 6:47:36 PM PST by rface

WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. - Prosecutors argued in court Tuesday that they should be allowed to speak with Rush Limbaugh's doctors as part the investigation into whether the conservative talk show commentator illegally purchased painkillers.

Meanwhile, Limbaugh's attorneys wanted the judge to hold prosecutors in contempt for allegedly giving information to the news media, the Palm Beach Post reported.

Limbaugh's attorney, Roy Black, argued that confidentiality between a doctor and patient is a privilege that even criminal investigators cannot penetrate.

"They cannot force Mr. Limbaugh to supply their evidence for them," Black said.

Assistant State Attorney James Martz said he needs to put basic questions to Limbaugh's doctors to investigate if there was a crime.

"I have no idea if Mr. Limbaugh has completed the elements of any offense yet . . . unless we can ask several pertinent questions," Martz told Circuit Judge David Crow.

Crow reserved ruling on Martz's request and said a written order would be issued later.

Prosecutors seized the records after learning that Limbaugh received about 2,000 painkillers, prescribed by four doctors in six months, at a pharmacy near his Palm Beach mansion. They contend that Limbaugh engaged in "doctor shopping," or illegally deceived multiple doctors to receive overlapping prescriptions.

Limbaugh has not been charged and maintains he's innocent. He has acknowledged he became addicted to pain medication, blaming it on severe back pain, and took a five-week leave from his radio show to enter a rehabilitation program in 2003.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: dhpl; doctorshopping; fishing; limbaugh; outtacontrol; patientrights; rogueprosecutor; rush
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last
records are just not good enough....they have to Talk to Limbaugh's doctors
1 posted on 11/08/2005 6:47:37 PM PST by rface
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rface

A continuing fishing expedition!


2 posted on 11/08/2005 6:49:37 PM PST by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

This is actually a good sign. This is evidence that they have NOTHING on him.

BTW, When are they going to go after Kate Moss?


3 posted on 11/08/2005 6:50:17 PM PST by RandallFlagg (Roll your own cigarettes! You'll save $$$ and smoke less!(Magnetic bumper stickers-click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late; Recovering_Democrat; Alissa; Pan_Yans Wife; LADY J; mathluv; browardchad; cardinal4; ...

4 posted on 11/08/2005 6:50:17 PM PST by Born Conservative (The word bipartisan usually means some larger-than-usual deception is being carried out - G. Carlin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface

That is so, if Limbaugh committed no crime, they will be able to take some inconsistency between what a doctor says about something the happened years ago, and turn it into a "false Statement", or perjury charge about a non-crime.


5 posted on 11/08/2005 6:51:20 PM PST by SubMareener (Become a monthly donor! Free FreeRepublic.com from Quarterly FReepathons!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface
Am I imagining things, or does it begin to appear that todays judicial system is a tool against our liberty??

What to do, what to do??
6 posted on 11/08/2005 6:51:41 PM PST by MCCRon58 (Those who can, do. Those who can't, teach. Those who do neither, complain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface

The South Florida version of Ronnie Earle. The criminalization of Conservatism continues.


7 posted on 11/08/2005 6:52:01 PM PST by Rosemont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface
Wow. The medical records weren't enough?

Now they want to break doctor-patient confidentiality too?

I think we can now officially call this case a political vendetta.

8 posted on 11/08/2005 6:52:16 PM PST by newzjunkey (CA YES: 73 (prolife) - 74 (teacher accountability) - 75 (paycheck protection). NO: 78, 79, 80)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface

Assistant State Attorney James Martz


"I have no idea if Mr. Limbaugh has completed the elements of any offense yet".


Well shouldn't they already know that someone has committed a crime before they ask to speak to someone's doctor?!!!


9 posted on 11/08/2005 6:54:27 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface

What a disgrace this whole thing is. If this goes through nobody is going to want to tell their doctors anything.


10 posted on 11/08/2005 6:54:33 PM PST by beandog (Proud bRushbot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface

Millions of dollars are being spent to see if Limbaugh committed a misdemeanor.


11 posted on 11/08/2005 6:55:07 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface

they need to back down now, gees, they have no case.......it's over.


12 posted on 11/08/2005 6:55:55 PM PST by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

And shouldn't they have some evidence of probable cause before they subpoena medical records?


13 posted on 11/08/2005 6:56:38 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Picking on someone with deep pockets is a huge mistake.


14 posted on 11/08/2005 6:57:13 PM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: Brilliant

I thought so but obviously some out of control prosecutors with a mission think they should have access to anything at anytime.


16 posted on 11/08/2005 6:59:34 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rface
""I have no idea if Mr. Limbaugh has completed the elements of any offense yet . . . unless we can ask several pertinent questions,"

Yes, a lack of evidence should not be allowed to deter our fishing expedition your honor. We can't make the case unless we are allowed to violate the doctor client privilege.

17 posted on 11/08/2005 7:01:27 PM PST by Enterprise (The modern Democrat Party - a toxic stew of mental illness, cultism, and organized crime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface

This is a mess - I wrote a thesis on the confidential relationships guaranteed by U. S. Law long ago (50's - in high school) - Priest and confessant; Attorney and client; Doctor and patient - these 3 are basic - now state laws and professional associations expand this to include CPA's, Realtors, Insurance Agents, etc. as "ethics" ... but the original 3 are - or were sacred - one on one confidentiality - ABSOLUTE - where the others are not - we are off course - the compass is broken.

Woe is us.


18 posted on 11/08/2005 7:01:30 PM PST by Bobibutu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface
"I have no idea if Mr. Limbaugh has completed the elements of any offense yet . . . unless we can ask several pertinent questions," Martz told Circuit Judge David Crow.. Appears to me that Judge David Crow would throw Mr Martz out of his court along with all the charges and even hold Mr Martz in contempt. Dang..how brazen is it to admit to bald faced fishing expedition?

I think that the State of Florida has stepped in it big time. Roy Black is probably significantly smarter than Mr Martz, and Rush probably has more money than the state.

19 posted on 11/08/2005 7:01:48 PM PST by B.O. Plenty (Islam, liberalism and abortions are terminal..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface

Imagine if it were the average person in Limbaugh's shoes- who would not have the $$ it takes to defend oneself against such crap.


20 posted on 11/08/2005 7:03:46 PM PST by RushCrush (Now for sale at your nearest gift shop, refrigerator magnets for boys on 'how to grow up and be gay')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson