To: an amused spectator
"an editor for The Post is now claiming authorization to log-in to the account of MD4BUSH."
Isn't that like saying the editor IS/WAS MD4BUSH?
17 posted on
11/05/2005 4:50:46 PM PST by
SeaBiscuit
(God Bless all who defend America and Friends, the rest can go to hell.)
To: SeaBiscuit
Isn't that like saying the editor IS/WAS MD4BUSH? No...later in the story, they claim an intermediary.
23 posted on
11/05/2005 4:53:21 PM PST by
Gondring
(I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
To: SeaBiscuit
Isn't that like saying the editor IS/WAS MD4BUSH? Yes, exactly. Wonder what sort of rhetorical hairs they're splitting with this BS? "Well, we logged on, but we didn't post anything. As far as YOU know..."
24 posted on
11/05/2005 4:54:19 PM PST by
an amused spectator
(If Social Security isn't broken, then cut me a check for the cash I have into it.)
To: SeaBiscuit
an editor for The Post is now claiming authorization to log-in to the account of MD4BUSH." Isn't that like saying the editor IS/WAS MD4BUSH?
DING DING DING, We have the winning answer here!
95 posted on
11/05/2005 5:41:11 PM PST by
cpdiii
(Roughneck, Geologist, Pilot, Pharmacist, Oil Field Trash and proud of it, full time Iconoclast.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson