...workers told investigators they were recruited from their native countries to work on cleaning crews at Wal-Mart stores, were paid twice a month for their efforts and lived with groups of other workers in small apartments or mobile homes.Although Wal-Mart employees now clean their stores, Linsey said it doesn't make up for his clients' suffering.
The American Dream
- Break the law.
- Blame your partner in crime for the consequences.
- Then sue them for the "suffering" they caused you.
To: DumpsterDiver; carolinacrazy
But . . .but . . .I was told that Wal-Mart was the greatest, most bestest store in the whole wide world!
2 posted on
11/04/2005 4:12:20 PM PST by
teenyelliott
(Soylent green should be made outta liberals...)
To: DumpsterDiver
During that meeting, Wal-Mart official Steve Bertschy told the undercover officers the company planned to quit doing business with sub-contracting cleaning crews to eliminate costs, but they were still using them because otherwise "we would have been in a terrible mess," the affidavit said. What did Wal-Mart do wrong? In some sort of covert gotcha operation, Wal-Mart officials did the right thing as soon as they were advised of the situation even though they didn't know they were being watched.
Wal-Mart got rid of the sub-contracted cleaning crews in a timely manner. If they had immediately termed the subcontractor, I'm sure they would have been in some sort of contractual and/or regulatory mess.
To: DumpsterDiver
100,000,000.00 fine would be fine: )
14 posted on
11/07/2005 11:36:27 AM PST by
calrighty
(C'mon troops, finish em off!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson