Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ben Bernanke : There is No Housing Bubble to Go Bust
Washington Post ^ | 10/27/2005 | Nell Henderson

Posted on 10/31/2005 11:27:56 AM PST by SirLinksalot

Bernanke: There's No Housing Bubble to Go Bust Fed Nominee Has Said 'Cooling' Won't Hurt

Ben S. Bernanke does not think the national housing boom is a bubble that is about to burst, he indicated to Congress last week, just a few days before President Bush nominated him to become the next chairman of the Federal Reserve.

U.S. house prices have risen by nearly 25 percent over the past two years, noted Bernanke, currently chairman of the president's Council of Economic Advisers, in testimony to Congress's Joint Economic Committee. But these increases, he said, "largely reflect strong economic fundamentals," such as strong growth in jobs, incomes and the number of new households.

Bernanke's thinking on the housing market did not attract much attention before Bush tapped him for the Fed job Monday but will likely be among the key topics explored by members of the Senate Banking Committee during upcoming hearings on his nomination.

SNIP SNIP

Bernanke's testimony suggests that he does not share such concerns, and that he believes the economy could weather a housing slowdown.

"House prices are unlikely to continue rising at current rates," said Bernanke, who served on the Fed board from 2002 until June. However, he added, "a moderate cooling in the housing market, should one occur, would not be inconsistent with the economy continuing to grow at or near its potential next year."

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bernanke; bubble; bust; fed; housing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last
Does this imply a cooling in interest rate hikes under a Bernanke chair ?
1 posted on 10/31/2005 11:27:57 AM PST by SirLinksalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

Hopefully - Greenspan was on the way to overdoing it again, just like he blew it in 2000


2 posted on 10/31/2005 11:28:37 AM PST by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

Wow! The goldbuggers aren't going to like that kind of talk.


3 posted on 10/31/2005 11:29:41 AM PST by Petronski (Cyborg is the greatest blessing I have ever known.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
Whew!

At first I was afraid that my ultrathin aluminum headgear business was going to take a hit with Greenspan leaving office, but Bernanke looks like he's going to get my clientele as hot and bothered as his predecessor.

4 posted on 10/31/2005 11:33:49 AM PST by wideawake (God bless our brave troops and their Commander-in-Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot


Don't think it's going to burst, but it's likely to deflate some.
5 posted on 10/31/2005 11:35:33 AM PST by flashbunny (Ask yourself why some posters here use the term "uber conservative" like it's some kind of slur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

He's smoking something. Prices cannot rise at 20% per year indefinitely, especially while the Fed is jacking interest rates. Of course, they have to jack them, to make up for the unnatural lowering of the rates that delivered the housing bubble to us in the first place.

Sure glad I'm getting to start a job this month that is not directly tied to the real estate market, I've been on that roller coaster for most of the last thirty years.


6 posted on 10/31/2005 11:37:04 AM PST by hunter112 (Total victory at home and in the Middle East!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

>> U.S. house prices have risen by nearly 25 percent over the past two years

and the income has.... ?


7 posted on 10/31/2005 11:39:21 AM PST by heybeavis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

If housing has gone up 25%, and isn't coming back down, does that not imply a stealth devaluation of the dollar?


8 posted on 10/31/2005 11:41:21 AM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
Depends on what part of the rise in inflation Bernanke thinks is caused by the housing market. There is a link between housing sales, both new and existing and the sales of durable goods such as washers, dryers, dishwashers, etc. AS far as that goes then the slow down in home sales could mean a lessening of inflation moving forward and a less urgent need to continue rate escalation.

Perhaps what Bernanke will do is pause and take a reading on inflation numbers for a month or 2 just to see. This is of course assuming that Greenspan raises rates in Nov and Dec. as he is widely expected to do.
9 posted on 10/31/2005 11:42:13 AM PST by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marron

How is that possible?! We don't have inflation![/sarcasm]


10 posted on 10/31/2005 11:50:12 AM PST by Atlas Sneezed (Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: marron
If housing has gone up 25%, and isn't coming back down, does that not imply a stealth devaluation of the dollar?

It's not stealth. However the devaluation of the dollar (by the Fed keeping rates too low) came first. The housing bubble and higher commodity prices are the result of that. Perhaps Bernanke was showing that he can shovel manure just as well as Greenspan. He got the job didn't he?

11 posted on 10/31/2005 11:50:37 AM PST by Moonman62 (Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
Does this imply a cooling in interest rate hikes under a Bernanke chair ?

Don't know but it's always best to let bubbles deflate themselves rather than have the central bank do someting about it (see 1929, US; see 1989, Japan; see 2000, US).

12 posted on 10/31/2005 11:52:54 AM PST by Moonman62 (Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

My husband and I are just about to buy our first home in Fresno, I hope we're making the right decision.


13 posted on 10/31/2005 11:55:24 AM PST by diamond6 (Everyone who is for abortion has already been born. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Black Tooth; ex-Texan

FYI, y'all.


14 posted on 10/31/2005 11:55:46 AM PST by RebelBanker (Captain's Log: Kinda nutty, a little corny, need to get my commode fixed now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RebelBanker

None of this matters anymore, because BB has already promised to drop all of the money we need from helicopters, come what may.


15 posted on 10/31/2005 12:02:56 PM PST by Travis McGee (--- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RebelBanker
Thanks for the head's up, RebelBanker.

My only thought is, "From Bernanke's lips to God's ears . . . " This is more of a prayer by the new Fed Chairman than anything else.

 New Fed Chairman May Sink Economy in Greenbacks

16 posted on 10/31/2005 12:04:34 PM PST by ex-Texan (Mathew 7:1 through 6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Eagles Talon IV
Perhaps what Bernanke will do is pause and take a reading on inflation numbers for a month or 2 just to see.

That would be a step in the right direction. The Fed should use market indicators such as the dollar index, commodity prices, and the yield curve to keep the value of the dollar stable. That's all it takes. All the hocus pocus about the wealth effect, economic overheating, full employment, etc has been nothing more than an excuse to micromanage the economy and to cause more problems than what get solved.

17 posted on 10/31/2005 12:12:32 PM PST by Moonman62 (Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RebelBanker
LOL.

Here in So. Cal, there are probably 4,000 for every home available. And the rich foreigners, all driving new Mercedes and Lexus just keep coming.

People don't get it. In desirable areas with nice, year round weather, people are NOT going to stop wanting to go there.

Supply and demand. And available land to build on the coastal plain in So. California is all but((GONE)).

18 posted on 10/31/2005 12:15:06 PM PST by Black Tooth (The more people I meet, the more I like my dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

I agree. Free markets work fine when left alone.


19 posted on 10/31/2005 12:15:28 PM PST by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: diamond6

If you're buying for a place to live and if you can afford it, how can you go wrong? Actually, even if you can't really afford it it might be just fine. I remember when my x and I moved into our first house we couldn't buy heating oil the first year but everything worked out over time..well, with the house that is.


20 posted on 10/31/2005 12:19:43 PM PST by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson