Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AP: Charges Don't Directly Address CIA Leak
BREITBART.COM ^ | Oct 28 3:37 PM US/Eastern | GINA HOLLAND Associated Press Writer

Posted on 10/28/2005 1:47:07 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

1 posted on 10/28/2005 1:47:09 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
what caused Clinton's impeachment "wasn't that he had an affair with Monica Lewinsky but he lied about it."

Wow! How did THIS get by the AP editors?

2 posted on 10/28/2005 1:51:17 PM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

What? A correct headline?


3 posted on 10/28/2005 1:51:22 PM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
AP: Charges Don't Directly Address CIA Leak

They are correct; Joseph Wilson was not indicted today.

4 posted on 10/28/2005 1:52:15 PM PDT by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
What I will remember about today---

David Gergen said, just a short time ago, (on CNN or MSNBC) that the White House can't blame it's troubles on an overzealous prosecutor or on being "kn*cked-up" by the press.

I think he meant "knocked-about."

5 posted on 10/28/2005 1:52:29 PM PDT by syriacus (Bush hasn't done a bad job, all things (WOT, vagaries of Nature, Lib lies + obstruction) considered)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

AGREED


6 posted on 10/28/2005 1:53:04 PM PDT by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach


WOW! Someone in the press is suggesting this is political?

Get ready, this reporter is going to be dragged to the woodshed by the rest of the "unbiased" reporters in the biz....


7 posted on 10/28/2005 1:53:19 PM PDT by Tzimisce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Levy said the indictment is "very narrow, very focused: it follows, very provable."

Until you look at the indictment itself and see it is about he said, he said situations.

8 posted on 10/28/2005 1:53:48 PM PDT by dirtboy (Drool overflowed my buffer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

there wasn't a crime until there was an investigation.


9 posted on 10/28/2005 1:55:36 PM PDT by smonk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
Wow! How did THIS get by the AP editors?

LOL! I did a double take on that too.

I imagine they relaxed their standards this time because the overall goal is to explain how they have a Republican in their cross-hairs.

10 posted on 10/28/2005 1:55:49 PM PDT by Gator101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All; NormsRevenge; Grampa Dave; SierraWasp; Marine_Uncle; Mo1; tubebender

Hat tip to Drudge on this one, by the way!


11 posted on 10/28/2005 1:56:59 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gator101

Wow! I can't believe someone got it right for a change.


12 posted on 10/28/2005 1:57:50 PM PDT by conservativepoet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Scooter was indicted on five counts of contradicting a reporter...

At least that's all I could garner from reading the indictment.


13 posted on 10/28/2005 1:58:34 PM PDT by telebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Hat tip to Drudge on this one, by the way!

I know people here don't like him much Hannity is doing a great Job on this also. Good analysis, good guests and good points.

14 posted on 10/28/2005 2:00:21 PM PDT by Archon of the East ("universal executive power of the law of nature")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Once again, and now after seeing this jacka@@ on TV, Fitzzzzzzzz is an lame excuse for a prosecutor. I've been in the Court system for 27 years, and I know a nut when I see one. Doesn't take much to pass the bar now days, just dumb every exercise with memory with no solid intelligence. Lawyers, salt of the earth, sure, sure, sure. Takes ten to screw in a light bulb, but they have a time finding the burned our bulb, and then looses the socket.
15 posted on 10/28/2005 2:02:09 PM PDT by Logical me (Oh, well!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smonk
Which is why we need to stop all these special prosecutions on both sides.

In retrospect, what did having been a senator have to do with the real reasons Ashcroft recused himself????

16 posted on 10/28/2005 2:02:24 PM PDT by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: syriacus
David Gergen said, just a short time ago, (on CNN or MSNBC) that the White House can't blame it's troubles on an overzealous prosecutor

I didn't catch him, but in a way he's correct: when the leak charges first aired a couple of years ago, Bush, in Pavlovian fashion, rushed to appoint a Special Prosecutor. There was no need for him to do this. Had he declined (especially as it now appears that no "blown cover" statute was violated) the flap would have soon died. So, it can be argued that today's indictment is a direct consequence of Bush's lack of resolve early on.

17 posted on 10/28/2005 2:02:51 PM PDT by Salvey (ancest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

18 posted on 10/28/2005 2:03:40 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (MSM pseudo reporters use "could, may, and might" when they are lying and spinning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

D.C. jury


D.C. jury


D.C. jury


D.C. jury


D.C. jury


D.C. jury


19 posted on 10/28/2005 2:04:41 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Peace Begins in the Womb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

That is correct, Fitzgerald did not charge anyone with the crime of "outing" a covert agent. Is he required to? Of course not. If the evidence doesn't meet the requirements of the statute, he's not going to charge anyone.

I note that the news media still can't get this straight. ABC Radio News led off with, "Valerie Plame was a covert agent."


20 posted on 10/28/2005 2:05:27 PM PDT by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson