Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cannoneer No. 4

Some military procurement officer can check me out on this--but the Hummer was designed to replace the venerable Jeep as an all-purpose unarmored utility vehicle, not as an armored fighting platform.

Utility--you know--run the troops and Generals around behind the lines, go for supplies. Refitting armor onto it over-strains the design capacity of its parts so they break down more often.

The armored vehicle for fighting infantry battles is the Bradley and the new Stryker.


13 posted on 10/26/2005 10:21:00 AM PDT by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: wildbill

Yep, you got it.


14 posted on 10/26/2005 10:50:33 AM PDT by Eagle Eye (There ought to be a law against excess legislation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: wildbill

Yes, but what is "behind the lines" in Iraq? I am sure that in a more conventional theatre of combat, the unarmored hummer does the job, but in a theatre such as Iraq, you need something lighter and more mobile than the Bradley (wheeled). Now, I wonder why the wonder machine (read Stryker) isn't the vehicle of choice. That is the real question.


16 posted on 10/26/2005 1:19:28 PM PDT by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson