Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jennyjenny
>>>>>I watched Kay Bailey Hutchison on MTP, and I didn't think she was saying committing perjury was a "technicality". I took her statement to mean that someone shouldn't be indicted for perjury if they innocently misspoke or contradicted themselves.<<<<<

Exactly. Conversations, out of hundreds of such conversations, two years ago. KBH's point was, perjury is an intent to deceive, not a difference in two individuals' recollections.

WJC intended to deceive the Paula Jones proceedings. Big distinction.

That said, if Rove or Libby intended to deceive the GJ in this case, they're toast.
20 posted on 10/25/2005 6:46:07 AM PDT by vrwinger (You're entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: vrwinger
That said, if Rove or Libby intended to deceive the GJ in this case, they're toast.

I agree, and they should be toast if that is proved to be the case.

36 posted on 10/25/2005 7:03:30 AM PDT by jennyjenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson