To: jennyjenny
>>>>>I watched Kay Bailey Hutchison on MTP, and I didn't think she was saying committing perjury was a "technicality". I took her statement to mean that someone shouldn't be indicted for perjury if they innocently misspoke or contradicted themselves.<<<<<
Exactly. Conversations, out of hundreds of such conversations, two years ago. KBH's point was, perjury is an intent to deceive, not a difference in two individuals' recollections.
WJC intended to deceive the Paula Jones proceedings. Big distinction.
That said, if Rove or Libby intended to deceive the GJ in this case, they're toast.
20 posted on
10/25/2005 6:46:07 AM PDT by
vrwinger
(You're entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts.)
To: vrwinger
That said, if Rove or Libby intended to deceive the GJ in this case, they're toast. I agree, and they should be toast if that is proved to be the case.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson