How come there is not more talk about how this office of the special investigator seems to be riddle with leaks? It does not appear that anyone in this office can keep the preceedings in the office as required by law.
When Clinton was under investigation and leaks were in the press the issue was not what was said but the poor and corrupt office that was allowing the leaks...
I'm surprised at you! The eager fetchdog press corpse was turning the attention AWAY from Clinton by stressing the leaky prosecutor. Now, they want to turn the attention TOWARD the President by stressing the impeccable quality of the prosecutor! Sleight of hand on the keyboard, camera, and radio.......
Can someone explain to me the differences between Joe Wilson and Linda Tripp, other than their polar opposite treatment in the press?
>>>>>How come there is not more talk about how this office of the special investigator seems to be riddled with leaks?<<<<<
That is, if you assume all of the 'leaks' we have been reading about are indeed leaks, and not speculation made up out of whole cloth by "journalists"...
It is obvious that special prosecutor Fitzgerald has not prevented leaks from his grand jury and may be guilty of leaking himself. It is a serious felony to leak grand jury proceedings.
President Bush should appoint a special prosecutor to convene a grand jury to investigate Fitzgerald and his staff in the matter of illegal leaks of secret grand jury testimony.
If indicted then Fitzgerald should be removed from the case all indictments of his grand jury over turned and Fitzgerald dis barred. Then a new grand jury and special prosecutor should be appointed to investigate the original charges.
Committing the same crime one is charged with punishing in others should carry the most severe punishment the law allows.