[AZConcervative]

I think we can safely say that there was no crime committed there. That is why the focus in recent days has changed to their testimonies. Whether or not they should have been there is no longer the point. If they lied while under oath in a Grand Jury then they have perjured themselves. I hope this is not the case, but we shall see.

[Archon of the East]

Recollection of some facts IMO doesn't warrant Perjury or Obstruction of Justice. It should be a definitive provable lie for it to be considered in a case involving no crime...IMHO

[houeto]

I think we can safely say that there was no crime committed there.

This has been my question all along. If no crime was committed by outing her role as a desk clerk, then why was a Special Prosecutor assigned in the first place? It should not take years to determine if the 'outing' was a crime or not.

[sinkspur]

If they lied while under oath in a Grand Jury then they have perjured themselves.

And with no underlying crime, it makes Fitzgerald look like a guy who has to justify two years of his salary.