"Anybody find that missing link, yet?
See post #92.
(Hint, its not missing.)"
So the scientists were lying all that time?
Please expound.
===========
See post #92.
(Hint, its not missing.)"
===========
So the scientists were lying all that time?
Please expound.
===========
I posted substantial data in #92. Others have posted substantial data as well.
But all you have done in about your last six posts is nitpick; you have posted no substance at all. Unless you can come up with something better, why should I bother to respond?
I think you are probably a YEC and that you won't believe any data which contradicts your beliefs, no matter how well-documented.
Fine. No problem. Believe what you wish.
But what you are doing is trying to bend the long-established rules of science, with no good reason, and trying to destroy the public's confidence in science's methods and findings, only to try to wedge your beliefs in through the back door.
Do you really think that this will benefit either you or your beliefs in the long run?